Personalized 3D-printed amniotic fornical ring for ocular surface reconstruction.

IF 6.8 3区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Nan Zhang, Ruixing Liu, Xiaowu Liu, Songlin Hou, Runan Dou, Xingchen Geng, Yan Li, Jingguo Li, Lei Zhu, Zhanrong Li
{"title":"Personalized 3D-printed amniotic fornical ring for ocular surface reconstruction.","authors":"Nan Zhang,&nbsp;Ruixing Liu,&nbsp;Xiaowu Liu,&nbsp;Songlin Hou,&nbsp;Runan Dou,&nbsp;Xingchen Geng,&nbsp;Yan Li,&nbsp;Jingguo Li,&nbsp;Lei Zhu,&nbsp;Zhanrong Li","doi":"10.18063/ijb.713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the present work, we used three-dimensional (3D) printing technology to make a polylactic acid (PLA) amniotic fornical ring (AFR) for ocular surface reconstruction. This work is a retrospective and interventional case series of patients with ocular surface diseases who underwent either personalized 3D-printed AFR-assisted amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) or sutured AMT (SAMT). Patient epidemiology, treatment, operative duration, epithelial healing time, retention time, vision changes, morbidity, and costs were analyzed. Thirty-one patients (40 eyes) and 19 patients (22 eyes) were enrolled in the 3D-printed AFR group and the SAMT group, respectively. The clinical indications of AFR and SAMT were similar, such as corneal and/or conjunctival epithelial defects due to chemical burns, thermal burns, Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), or toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). The mean dissolution time was 15 ± 11 days in the AFR group, compared with 14 ± 7 days in the SAMT group. The percentage of healed corneal area was 90.91% (66.10%-100.00%) for AFR and 93.67% (60.23%-100.00%) for SAMT. The median time for corneal epithelial healing was 14 (7-75) days in the AFR group and 30 (14-55) days in the suture AMT group. There were no significant differences in the initial visual acuity, final visual acuity, or improvement in visual acuity between the two groups. The operation duration in the AFR group was significantly shorter than that in the SAMT group. Regarding the cost analysis, the average cost per eye in the AFR group was significantly lower than that in the SAMT group. Furthermore, 3D-printed and sterile AFR showed no obvious side effects on the eyes. Our results suggested that 3D-printed PLA scaffolds could be used as an AFR device for ocular surface disease. In addition, personalized 3D-printed AFR is superior to conventional AMT in operation duration and cost effectiveness, thereby reducing the financial burden on our health care system.</p>","PeriodicalId":48522,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Bioprinting","volume":"9 3","pages":"713"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3b/2c/IJB-9-3-713.PMC10236349.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Bioprinting","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.713","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the present work, we used three-dimensional (3D) printing technology to make a polylactic acid (PLA) amniotic fornical ring (AFR) for ocular surface reconstruction. This work is a retrospective and interventional case series of patients with ocular surface diseases who underwent either personalized 3D-printed AFR-assisted amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) or sutured AMT (SAMT). Patient epidemiology, treatment, operative duration, epithelial healing time, retention time, vision changes, morbidity, and costs were analyzed. Thirty-one patients (40 eyes) and 19 patients (22 eyes) were enrolled in the 3D-printed AFR group and the SAMT group, respectively. The clinical indications of AFR and SAMT were similar, such as corneal and/or conjunctival epithelial defects due to chemical burns, thermal burns, Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), or toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). The mean dissolution time was 15 ± 11 days in the AFR group, compared with 14 ± 7 days in the SAMT group. The percentage of healed corneal area was 90.91% (66.10%-100.00%) for AFR and 93.67% (60.23%-100.00%) for SAMT. The median time for corneal epithelial healing was 14 (7-75) days in the AFR group and 30 (14-55) days in the suture AMT group. There were no significant differences in the initial visual acuity, final visual acuity, or improvement in visual acuity between the two groups. The operation duration in the AFR group was significantly shorter than that in the SAMT group. Regarding the cost analysis, the average cost per eye in the AFR group was significantly lower than that in the SAMT group. Furthermore, 3D-printed and sterile AFR showed no obvious side effects on the eyes. Our results suggested that 3D-printed PLA scaffolds could be used as an AFR device for ocular surface disease. In addition, personalized 3D-printed AFR is superior to conventional AMT in operation duration and cost effectiveness, thereby reducing the financial burden on our health care system.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用于眼表重建的个性化3d打印羊膜正式环。
在本工作中,我们采用三维(3D)打印技术制作了用于眼表重建的聚乳酸(PLA)羊膜形环(AFR)。本研究是对接受个性化3d打印afr辅助羊膜移植(AMT)或缝合羊膜移植(SAMT)的眼表疾病患者的回顾性和干预性病例系列。分析患者流行病学、治疗、手术时间、上皮愈合时间、保留时间、视力变化、发病率和费用。3d打印AFR组31例(40只眼),SAMT组19例(22只眼)。AFR和SAMT的临床适应症相似,如化学烧伤、热烧伤、Stevens-Johnson综合征(SJS)或中毒性表皮坏死松解(TEN)所致的角膜和/或结膜上皮缺损。AFR组平均溶出时间为15±11天,SAMT组平均溶出时间为14±7天。AFR组角膜愈合面积占90.91% (66.10% ~ 100.00%),SAMT组角膜愈合面积占93.67%(60.23% ~ 100.00%)。AFR组角膜上皮愈合的中位时间为14(7-75)天,缝合AMT组为30(14-55)天。两组患者的初始视力、最终视力及视力改善均无显著差异。AFR组的手术时间明显短于SAMT组。在成本分析方面,AFR组每只眼的平均成本显著低于SAMT组。此外,3d打印无菌AFR对眼睛没有明显的副作用。我们的研究结果表明,3d打印PLA支架可以作为眼表疾病的AFR装置。此外,个性化3d打印AFR在操作时间和成本效益方面优于传统AMT,从而减轻了医疗保健系统的经济负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Bioprinting is a globally recognized publication that focuses on the advancements, scientific discoveries, and practical implementations of Bioprinting. Bioprinting, in simple terms, involves the utilization of 3D printing technology and materials that contain living cells or biological components to fabricate tissues or other biotechnological products. Our journal encompasses interdisciplinary research that spans across technology, science, and clinical applications within the expansive realm of Bioprinting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信