Effective assay technologies fit for large-scale population screening of type 1 diabetes.

Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare Pub Date : 2023-01-23 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcdhc.2022.1034698
Xiaofan Jia, Liping Yu
{"title":"Effective assay technologies fit for large-scale population screening of type 1 diabetes.","authors":"Xiaofan Jia, Liping Yu","doi":"10.3389/fcdhc.2022.1034698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While worldwide prevention efforts for type 1 diabetes (T1D) are underway to abrogate or slow progression to diabetes, mass screening of islet autoantibodies (IAbs) in the general population is urgently needed. IAbs, the most reliable biomarkers, play an essential role in prediction and clinical diagnosis of T1D. Through laboratory proficiency programs and harmonization efforts, a radio-binding assay (RBA) has been well established as the current 'gold' standard assay for all four IAbs. However, in view of the need for large-scale screening in the non-diabetic population, RBA consistently faces two fundamental challenges, cost-efficiency and disease specificity. While all four IAbs are important for disease prediction, the RBA platform, with a separate IAb test format is laborious, inefficient and expensive. Furthermore, the majority of IAb positivity in screening, especially from individuals with single IAb were found to be low risk with low affinity. It is well documented from multiple clinical studies that IAbs with low affinity are low risk with less or no disease relevance. At present, two non-radioactive multiplex assays, a 3-assay ELISA combining three IAbs and a multiplex ECL assay combining all four IAbs, have been successfully used as the primary methods for general population screenings in Germany and the US, respectively. Recently, the TrialNet Pathway to Prevention study has been organizing an IAb workshop which aims to analyze the 5-year T1D predictive values of IAbs. A T1D-specific assay with high efficiency, low cost and requiring low volume of sample will definitely be necessary to benefit general population screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":73075,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10012058/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcdhc.2022.1034698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

While worldwide prevention efforts for type 1 diabetes (T1D) are underway to abrogate or slow progression to diabetes, mass screening of islet autoantibodies (IAbs) in the general population is urgently needed. IAbs, the most reliable biomarkers, play an essential role in prediction and clinical diagnosis of T1D. Through laboratory proficiency programs and harmonization efforts, a radio-binding assay (RBA) has been well established as the current 'gold' standard assay for all four IAbs. However, in view of the need for large-scale screening in the non-diabetic population, RBA consistently faces two fundamental challenges, cost-efficiency and disease specificity. While all four IAbs are important for disease prediction, the RBA platform, with a separate IAb test format is laborious, inefficient and expensive. Furthermore, the majority of IAb positivity in screening, especially from individuals with single IAb were found to be low risk with low affinity. It is well documented from multiple clinical studies that IAbs with low affinity are low risk with less or no disease relevance. At present, two non-radioactive multiplex assays, a 3-assay ELISA combining three IAbs and a multiplex ECL assay combining all four IAbs, have been successfully used as the primary methods for general population screenings in Germany and the US, respectively. Recently, the TrialNet Pathway to Prevention study has been organizing an IAb workshop which aims to analyze the 5-year T1D predictive values of IAbs. A T1D-specific assay with high efficiency, low cost and requiring low volume of sample will definitely be necessary to benefit general population screening.

适合大规模人群 1 型糖尿病筛查的有效检测技术。
虽然全世界都在努力预防 1 型糖尿病(T1D),以消除或延缓糖尿病的发展,但在普通人群中大规模筛查胰岛自身抗体(IAbs)仍是当务之急。IAbs是最可靠的生物标志物,在T1D的预测和临床诊断中起着至关重要的作用。通过实验室能力计划和协调努力,放射结合测定(RBA)已被确立为目前所有四种 IAbs 的 "黄金 "标准测定方法。然而,鉴于需要在非糖尿病人群中进行大规模筛查,放射结合测定始终面临着两个基本挑战:成本效益和疾病特异性。虽然所有四种 IAb 对疾病预测都很重要,但采用独立 IAb 检测形式的 RBA 平台费力、低效且昂贵。此外,筛查中发现的大多数 IAb 阳性,尤其是来自单个 IAb 阳性的个体,都是低亲和力的低风险个体。多项临床研究充分表明,低亲和力的 IAb 是低风险的,与疾病的相关性较低或没有。目前,德国和美国已分别成功地将两种非放射性的多重检测方法--结合三种 IAb 的三重 ELISA 检测法和结合所有四种 IAb 的多重 ECL 检测法--作为普通人群筛查的主要方法。最近,TrialNet Pathway to Prevention 研究组织了一次 IAb 研讨会,旨在分析 IAbs 的 5 年 T1D 预测值。高效、低成本、低样本量的 T1D 特异性检测对普通人群筛查的益处是绝对必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信