Short-Term Comparison of Clinical Performance of Universal Adhesives with Self-Etch Mode in NCCL Restorations.

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2023-05-31 DOI:10.1922/EJPRD_2429Karabay14

F Karabay, M Demirci, S Tuncer, N Tekçe, M Berkman, C Baydemir

{"title":"Short-Term Comparison of Clinical Performance of Universal Adhesives with Self-Etch Mode in NCCL Restorations.","authors":"F Karabay, M Demirci, S Tuncer, N Tekçe, M Berkman, C Baydemir","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2429Karabay14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To evaluate the clinical performance of universal adhesives with self-etch mode regarding their functional monomer and HEMA contents.Methods: The study involved 27 patients (108 restorations) aged between 34 and 69 (mean age: 53.8). Each restoration contained one of four different universal adhesives applied in self-etch mode: G-Premio Bond (HEMA-free, MDP and 4-MET containing), Xeno Select (HEMA and MDP-free), Tetric-n-Bond Universal (HEMA and MDP-containing) and Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (HEMA, MDP and amide monomers containing). The restorations were evaluated according to the FDI criteria at baseline, 6, and 12 months. The data were statistically analyzed using Friedman's and Kruskal-Wallis tests for significance in each pair (p⟨0.05).Results: After 12 months, one restoration was lost in each of the G-Premio Bond and Clearfil Bond Quick groups. The success rate was 96.3% for both adhesives and 100% for Xeno Select and Tetric-n-Bond adhesives. There was no statistically significant difference between the four dentin adhesive groups among all the evaluation periods regarding any evaluation criteria. However, four universal adhesives showed clinically acceptable marginal discoloration and marginal deterioration in a few restorations.Conclusion: Monomer contents of universal adhesives with self-etch mode had no significant effect on the success of restorations.","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2429Karabay14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the clinical performance of universal adhesives with self-etch mode regarding their functional monomer and HEMA contents.

Methods: The study involved 27 patients (108 restorations) aged between 34 and 69 (mean age: 53.8). Each restoration contained one of four different universal adhesives applied in self-etch mode: G-Premio Bond (HEMA-free, MDP and 4-MET containing), Xeno Select (HEMA and MDP-free), Tetric-n-Bond Universal (HEMA and MDP-containing) and Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (HEMA, MDP and amide monomers containing). The restorations were evaluated according to the FDI criteria at baseline, 6, and 12 months. The data were statistically analyzed using Friedman's and Kruskal-Wallis tests for significance in each pair (p⟨0.05).

Results: After 12 months, one restoration was lost in each of the G-Premio Bond and Clearfil Bond Quick groups. The success rate was 96.3% for both adhesives and 100% for Xeno Select and Tetric-n-Bond adhesives. There was no statistically significant difference between the four dentin adhesive groups among all the evaluation periods regarding any evaluation criteria. However, four universal adhesives showed clinically acceptable marginal discoloration and marginal deterioration in a few restorations.

Conclusion: Monomer contents of universal adhesives with self-etch mode had no significant effect on the success of restorations.

查看原文本刊更多论文

通用粘结剂与自蚀粘结剂在NCCL修复中的短期临床性能比较。

目的:评价自蚀型万能粘接剂的功能单体及HEMA含量的临床性能。方法:27例患者(108个修复体)，年龄34 ~ 69岁，平均年龄53.8岁。每个修复包含四种不同的通用粘合剂中的一种，用于自蚀刻模式:G-Premio Bond(不含HEMA, MDP和4-MET)， Xeno Select(不含HEMA和MDP)， tetrici -n-Bond universal(含HEMA和MDP)和Clearfil universal Bond Quick(含HEMA, MDP和酰胺单体)。根据基线、6个月和12个月的FDI标准对修复进行评估。采用Friedman's检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验对每对数据进行统计学分析(p⟨0.05)。结果:12个月后，G-Premio Bond组和Clearfil Bond Quick组各丢失1个修复体。两种胶粘剂的成功率为96.3%，Xeno Select和Tetric-n-Bond胶粘剂的成功率为100%。四组牙本质粘接剂在各评价期间的各项评价指标均无统计学差异。然而，四种通用粘接剂在一些修复中显示临床可接受的边缘变色和边缘退化。结论:自蚀型万能粘接剂单体含量对修复成功率无显著影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

7.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.