The Clinical Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Vancomycin for the Treatment of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection - A Systematic Review.

IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Maja Johanne Søndergaard Knudsen, Ingrid Maria Cecilia Rubin, Andreas Munk Petersen
{"title":"The Clinical Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Vancomycin for the Treatment of Recurrent <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> Infection - A Systematic Review.","authors":"Maja Johanne Søndergaard Knudsen,&nbsp;Ingrid Maria Cecilia Rubin,&nbsp;Andreas Munk Petersen","doi":"10.2147/DHPS.S348501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The aim of this systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was to examine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of vancomycin for treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI). Methods The PubMed database was searched from inception to August 23, 2022. An initial screening was performed followed by a full-text evaluation of the papers. Inclusion criteria were RCTs investigating vancomycin for treatment of rCDI. Results A total of six studies and 269 patients were included in the review. Three studies used a fixed dose regimen of vancomycin, one study used pulse regimen, one study used a taper-and-pulse regimen, and one study used a taper-and-pulse regimen for the participants with two or more recurrences. The resolution of infection varied from 19% to 58.3% in five of six studies reporting this as an outcome. Four out of six studies reported new episodes of rCDI as an intervention outcome, in those studies 50–63% of participants experienced rCDI. Regarding the safety and tolerability of vancomycin treatment for rCDI, one study described several adverse events regarding gastrointestinal discomfort along with fatigue and skin rash. There were no records of serious adverse events in the included studies. Conclusion While oral vancomycin is mostly safe and well tolerated in the RCTs reviewed here, the efficacy for treating rCDI varies greatly from 19–58.3%, and 50–63% of participants experienced new episodes of rCDI.","PeriodicalId":11377,"journal":{"name":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","volume":"15 ","pages":"63-71"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6b/8e/dhps-15-63.PMC10039659.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S348501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction The aim of this systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was to examine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of vancomycin for treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI). Methods The PubMed database was searched from inception to August 23, 2022. An initial screening was performed followed by a full-text evaluation of the papers. Inclusion criteria were RCTs investigating vancomycin for treatment of rCDI. Results A total of six studies and 269 patients were included in the review. Three studies used a fixed dose regimen of vancomycin, one study used pulse regimen, one study used a taper-and-pulse regimen, and one study used a taper-and-pulse regimen for the participants with two or more recurrences. The resolution of infection varied from 19% to 58.3% in five of six studies reporting this as an outcome. Four out of six studies reported new episodes of rCDI as an intervention outcome, in those studies 50–63% of participants experienced rCDI. Regarding the safety and tolerability of vancomycin treatment for rCDI, one study described several adverse events regarding gastrointestinal discomfort along with fatigue and skin rash. There were no records of serious adverse events in the included studies. Conclusion While oral vancomycin is mostly safe and well tolerated in the RCTs reviewed here, the efficacy for treating rCDI varies greatly from 19–58.3%, and 50–63% of participants experienced new episodes of rCDI.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

万古霉素治疗复发性艰难梭菌感染的临床疗效、安全性和耐受性——系统综述。
简介:本系统综述随机临床试验(RCTs)的目的是研究万古霉素治疗复发性艰难梭菌感染(rCDI)的有效性、安全性和耐受性。方法:检索PubMed数据库自成立至2022年8月23日。首先进行初步筛选,然后对论文进行全文评估。纳入标准为研究万古霉素治疗rCDI的随机对照试验。结果:共纳入6项研究和269例患者。三项研究使用固定剂量万古霉素治疗方案,一项研究使用脉冲治疗方案,一项研究使用锥形脉冲治疗方案,一项研究使用锥形脉冲治疗方案,一项研究对两次或两次以上复发的参与者使用锥形脉冲治疗方案。在报道这一结果的6项研究中,有5项研究的感染率从19%到58.3%不等。6项研究中有4项报告了rCDI的新发作作为干预结果,在这些研究中,50-63%的参与者经历了rCDI。关于万古霉素治疗rCDI的安全性和耐受性,一项研究描述了胃肠道不适、疲劳和皮疹等不良事件。在纳入的研究中没有严重不良事件的记录。结论:虽然在本文回顾的随机对照试验中,口服万古霉素大多是安全且耐受性良好的,但治疗rCDI的疗效差异很大,在19-58.3%之间,50-63%的参与者出现了新的rCDI发作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信