EPA Consensus Project Paper: The Vertical Dimension of Occlusion. How to Determine and How to Alter? A Systematic Review.

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1922/EJPRD_2487Pissiotis13

A L Pissiotis, S N Kamalakidis, Y Kirmanidou, E Zahari, R Karpouzi, K Michalakis

{"title":"EPA Consensus Project Paper: The Vertical Dimension of Occlusion. How to Determine and How to Alter? A Systematic Review.","authors":"A L Pissiotis, S N Kamalakidis, Y Kirmanidou, E Zahari, R Karpouzi, K Michalakis","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2487Pissiotis13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of this systematic review was to explore the dental literature to identify high quality clinical studies that introduced methods of determining the vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO), and additionally to find studies which assessed alterations in the VDO.Materials and methods: An electronic search of the literature was conducted through PubMed , Embase, and Cochrane Library databases referring to the determination and alteration of the VDO by 12/2021.Results: A total of 215 records were obtained from the initial search. After the first two screenings, 33 studies were selected for inclusion. Correlations in the morphometric group ranged between r=0.18-0.87, p⟨0.05-0.001, correlations in the cephalometric group ranged between r=0.28-0.92, p⟨0.05-0.001, and correlations in the mechanometric group ranged between r=0.21- 0.75, p⟨0.05-0.01. Regarding the alteration of VDO, in all studies the increase ranged between 1.8-8 mm and the patients adapted .Conclusions: No clear guidelines can be established yet, in relation to the determination and alteration of the VDO. There is no apparent benefit in using more invasive and complex methods compared to the use of the facial anatomical landmarks. Patient adaptation seems to be successful when the range of VDO increase was 1.8-6.0 mm.","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2487Pissiotis13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this systematic review was to explore the dental literature to identify high quality clinical studies that introduced methods of determining the vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO), and additionally to find studies which assessed alterations in the VDO.

Materials and methods: An electronic search of the literature was conducted through PubMed , Embase, and Cochrane Library databases referring to the determination and alteration of the VDO by 12/2021.

Results: A total of 215 records were obtained from the initial search. After the first two screenings, 33 studies were selected for inclusion. Correlations in the morphometric group ranged between r=0.18-0.87, p⟨0.05-0.001, correlations in the cephalometric group ranged between r=0.28-0.92, p⟨0.05-0.001, and correlations in the mechanometric group ranged between r=0.21- 0.75, p⟨0.05-0.01. Regarding the alteration of VDO, in all studies the increase ranged between 1.8-8 mm and the patients adapted .

Conclusions: No clear guidelines can be established yet, in relation to the determination and alteration of the VDO. There is no apparent benefit in using more invasive and complex methods compared to the use of the facial anatomical landmarks. Patient adaptation seems to be successful when the range of VDO increase was 1.8-6.0 mm.

查看原文本刊更多论文

EPA共识项目论文:遮挡的垂直维度。如何决定，如何改变?系统评价。

目的:本系统综述的目的是探索牙科文献，以确定高质量的临床研究，这些研究介绍了确定咬合垂直尺寸(VDO)的方法，以及评估VDO改变的研究。材料和方法:通过PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行文献电子检索，参考到2021年12月VDO的确定和修改。结果:首次检索共获得215条记录。在前两次筛选后，33项研究被选择纳入。形态测量组的相关性在r=0.18-0.87之间，p⟨0.05-0.001，头测量组的相关性在r=0.28-0.92之间，p⟨0.05-0.001，机械测量组的相关性在r=0.21- 0.75之间，p⟨0.05-0.01。关于VDO的改变，在所有的研究中，VDO的增加范围在1.8- 8mm之间，患者适应。结论:关于VDO的测定和改变，尚未建立明确的指南。与使用面部解剖标志相比，使用更具侵入性和更复杂的方法没有明显的好处。当VDO增加范围为1.8-6.0 mm时，患者适应似乎是成功的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

7.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.