Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage for benign biliary obstruction - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Faisal Kamal, Muhammad Ali Khan, Wade Lee-Smith, Sachit Sharma, Ashu Acharya, Umer Farooq, Zahid Ijaz Tarar, Alec E Faggen, Muhammad Aziz, Saurabh Chandan, Zohaib Ahmed, Abdul Kouanda, Sun-Chuan Dai, Craig A Munroe, Douglas G Adler
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage for benign biliary obstruction - A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Faisal Kamal,&nbsp;Muhammad Ali Khan,&nbsp;Wade Lee-Smith,&nbsp;Sachit Sharma,&nbsp;Ashu Acharya,&nbsp;Umer Farooq,&nbsp;Zahid Ijaz Tarar,&nbsp;Alec E Faggen,&nbsp;Muhammad Aziz,&nbsp;Saurabh Chandan,&nbsp;Zohaib Ahmed,&nbsp;Abdul Kouanda,&nbsp;Sun-Chuan Dai,&nbsp;Craig A Munroe,&nbsp;Douglas G Adler","doi":"10.4103/EUS-D-22-00077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>ERCP is the first line of treatment for benign and malignant biliary obstruction and EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is usually used for patients who have failed ERCP. Recently, several studies have evaluated the role of EUS-BD in the management of benign biliary obstruction. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of EUS-BD in the management of benign biliary obstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed several databases from inception to July 8, 2022, to identify studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of EUS-BD in the management of benign biliary obstruction. Our outcomes of interest were technical success, clinical success, and adverse events. Pooled rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all outcomes were calculated using a random effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed including patients with normal anatomy versus surgically altered anatomy (SAA). Heterogeneity was assessed by I<sup>2</sup> statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 14 studies with 329 patients. The pooled rate (95% CI) of technical success was 88% (83%, 92%). The pooled rate (95% CI) of technical success for patients with SAA and normal anatomy was 92% (85%, 96%) and 83% (75%, 89%), respectively. The pooled rates (95% CI) of clinical success and adverse events were 89% (83%, 93%) and 19% (13%, 26%), respectively. We found low heterogeneity in most of the analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EUS-BD is an effective and safe option in patients with benign biliary obstruction and should be considered after a failed attempt at ERCP or when ERCP is not technically possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":11577,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopic Ultrasound","volume":"12 2","pages":"228-236"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6a/21/EUS-12-228.PMC10237615.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopic Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-22-00077","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: ERCP is the first line of treatment for benign and malignant biliary obstruction and EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is usually used for patients who have failed ERCP. Recently, several studies have evaluated the role of EUS-BD in the management of benign biliary obstruction. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of EUS-BD in the management of benign biliary obstruction.

Methods: We reviewed several databases from inception to July 8, 2022, to identify studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of EUS-BD in the management of benign biliary obstruction. Our outcomes of interest were technical success, clinical success, and adverse events. Pooled rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all outcomes were calculated using a random effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed including patients with normal anatomy versus surgically altered anatomy (SAA). Heterogeneity was assessed by I2 statistic.

Results: We included 14 studies with 329 patients. The pooled rate (95% CI) of technical success was 88% (83%, 92%). The pooled rate (95% CI) of technical success for patients with SAA and normal anatomy was 92% (85%, 96%) and 83% (75%, 89%), respectively. The pooled rates (95% CI) of clinical success and adverse events were 89% (83%, 93%) and 19% (13%, 26%), respectively. We found low heterogeneity in most of the analyses.

Conclusions: EUS-BD is an effective and safe option in patients with benign biliary obstruction and should be considered after a failed attempt at ERCP or when ERCP is not technically possible.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

EUS引导下胆道引流治疗良性胆道梗阻的疗效和安全性——一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景和目的:ERCP是治疗良恶性胆道梗阻的第一线,EUS引导下胆道引流(EUS-BD)通常用于ERCP失败的患者。最近,一些研究评估了EUS-BD在良性胆道梗阻治疗中的作用。本荟萃分析评估了EUS-BD治疗良性胆道梗阻的疗效和安全性。方法:我们回顾了从成立到2022年7月8日的几个数据库,以确定评估EUS-BD治疗良性胆道梗阻的疗效和安全性的研究。我们感兴趣的结果是技术成功、临床成功和不良事件。使用随机效应模型计算所有结果的95%置信区间(CI)的合并率。进行亚组分析,包括解剖结构正常与手术改变(SAA)的患者。通过I2统计评估异质性。结果:我们纳入了14项研究,涉及329名患者。技术成功的合并率(95%CI)为88%(83%,92%)。SAA和正常解剖患者的技术成功率(95%CI)分别为92%(85%,96%)和83%(75%,89%)。临床成功率和不良事件的合并率(95%CI)分别为89%(83%,93%)和19%(13%,26%)。我们在大多数分析中发现异质性较低。结论:EUS-BD在良性胆道梗阻患者中是一种有效且安全的选择,在ERCP尝试失败或ERCP在技术上不可行时应考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endoscopic Ultrasound
Endoscopic Ultrasound GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
144
期刊介绍: Endoscopic Ultrasound, a publication of Euro-EUS Scientific Committee, Asia-Pacific EUS Task Force and Latin American Chapter of EUS, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Quarterly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.eusjournal.com. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal does not charge for submission, processing or publication of manuscripts and even for color reproduction of photographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信