Utility of On-Treatment Viral Loads During Treatment With Direct-Acting Antivirals in Patients Infected With Chronic Viral Hepatitis C.

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Shila Mortazavi, Lauren M Hynicka
{"title":"Utility of On-Treatment Viral Loads During Treatment With Direct-Acting Antivirals in Patients Infected With Chronic Viral Hepatitis C.","authors":"Shila Mortazavi,&nbsp;Lauren M Hynicka","doi":"10.1177/87551225221092598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents have revolutionized the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Current data regarding the utility of on-treatment HCV viral load (VL) monitoring are conflicting and limited data are available in HIV-coinfected patients. <b>Objective:</b> The objective of the study was to determine whether on-treatment VLs are predictive of HCV cure in a real-world population. <b>Method:</b> A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted using patients who received a prescription for DAA therapy for HCV treatment at a large, tertiary ambulatory care clinic. <b>Results:</b> A total of 219 patients were included in the final analysis. The average age was 56 years. Most patients were male (64.4%), African American (73.1%), and insured by Medicaid (61.6%). Most patients were treatment-naive, noncirrhotic, and infected with HCV genotype 1a (73.1%). About 22.4% of patients were coinfected with HIV. The most common regimen was 12 weeks of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (53.9%). On-treatment VLs were most commonly obtained at treatment week 4 (42.5%), of which 45.2% of patients were detectable. Sustained virologic response (SVR) was achieved in 96.8% of the total population and 95.9% of HIV-coinfected patients. Of the 7 patients who did not achieve SVR, 3 patients had undetectable on-treatment VLs in the first 8 weeks of therapy. <b>Conclusion:</b> Sustained virologic response rates were similar between HCV-monoinfected patients and HCV-HIV-coinfected patients. This research further supports that on-treatment VLs may not be a valuable indicator of treatment failure but may be helpful to engage patients in care and ensure treatment adherence and ultimately cure.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9272490/pdf/10.1177_87551225221092598.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225221092598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents have revolutionized the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Current data regarding the utility of on-treatment HCV viral load (VL) monitoring are conflicting and limited data are available in HIV-coinfected patients. Objective: The objective of the study was to determine whether on-treatment VLs are predictive of HCV cure in a real-world population. Method: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted using patients who received a prescription for DAA therapy for HCV treatment at a large, tertiary ambulatory care clinic. Results: A total of 219 patients were included in the final analysis. The average age was 56 years. Most patients were male (64.4%), African American (73.1%), and insured by Medicaid (61.6%). Most patients were treatment-naive, noncirrhotic, and infected with HCV genotype 1a (73.1%). About 22.4% of patients were coinfected with HIV. The most common regimen was 12 weeks of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (53.9%). On-treatment VLs were most commonly obtained at treatment week 4 (42.5%), of which 45.2% of patients were detectable. Sustained virologic response (SVR) was achieved in 96.8% of the total population and 95.9% of HIV-coinfected patients. Of the 7 patients who did not achieve SVR, 3 patients had undetectable on-treatment VLs in the first 8 weeks of therapy. Conclusion: Sustained virologic response rates were similar between HCV-monoinfected patients and HCV-HIV-coinfected patients. This research further supports that on-treatment VLs may not be a valuable indicator of treatment failure but may be helpful to engage patients in care and ensure treatment adherence and ultimately cure.

使用直接作用抗病毒药物治疗慢性病毒性丙型肝炎患者时治疗中病毒载量的效用
背景:直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)已经彻底改变了慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染的治疗。目前关于治疗中监测HCV病毒载量(VL)效用的数据是相互矛盾的,并且在hiv合并感染患者中可获得的数据有限。目的:该研究的目的是确定在现实世界人群中,治疗中的vl是否可以预测HCV治愈。方法:采用一项单中心、回顾性队列研究,研究对象为在一家大型三级门诊接受DAA治疗HCV的患者。结果:219例患者纳入最终分析。平均年龄为56岁。大多数患者为男性(64.4%)、非裔美国人(73.1%)和医疗补助(61.6%)。大多数患者未接受治疗,无肝硬化,感染HCV基因型1a(73.1%)。约22.4%的患者合并感染艾滋病毒。最常见的方案是12周的雷地帕韦/索非布韦(53.9%)。治疗中vl最常见于治疗第4周(42.5%),其中45.2%的患者可检测到。96.8%的人群和95.9%的hiv合并感染患者实现了持续病毒学应答(SVR)。在未达到SVR的7例患者中,3例患者在治疗前8周未检测到治疗期vl。结论:hcv -单感染患者和hcv - hiv -合并感染患者的持续病毒学应答率相似。这项研究进一步支持,在治疗中的VLs可能不是治疗失败的一个有价值的指标,但可能有助于患者参与护理,确保治疗依从性并最终治愈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信