{"title":"The Aspects of Running Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Care; a Scoping Review.","authors":"Mohsen Masoumian Hosseini, Seyedeh Toktam Masoumian Hosseini, Karim Qayumi, Soleiman Ahmady, Hamid Reza Koohestani","doi":"10.22037/aaem.v11i1.1974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Artificial Inteligence (AI) application in emergency medicine is subject to ethical and legal inconsistencies. The purposes of this study were to map the extent of AI applications in emergency medicine, to identify ethical issues related to the use of AI, and to propose an ethical framework for its use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature collection was compiled through electronic databases/internet search engines (PubMed, Web of Science Platform, MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar/Academia, and ERIC) and reference lists. We considered studies published between 1 January 2014 and 6 October 2022. Articles that did not self-classify as studies of an AI intervention, those that were not relevant to Emergency Departments (EDs), and articles that did not report outcomes or evaluations were excluded. Descriptive and thematic analyses of data extracted from the included articles were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 137 out of the 2175 citations in the original database were eligible for full-text evaluation. Of these articles, 47 were included in the scoping review and considered for theme extraction. This review covers seven main areas of AI techniques in emergency medicine: Machine Learning (ML) Algorithms (10.64%), prehospital emergency management (12.76%), triage, patient acuity and disposition of patients (19.15%), disease and condition prediction (23.40%), emergency department management (17.03%), the future impact of AI on Emergency Medical Services (EMS) (8.51%), and ethical issues (8.51%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There has been a rapid increase in AI research in emergency medicine in recent years. Several studies have demonstrated the potential of AI in diverse contexts, particularly when improving patient outcomes through predictive modelling. According to the synthesis of studies in our review, AI-based decision-making lacks transparency. This feature makes AI decision-making opaque.</p>","PeriodicalId":8146,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"e38"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ce/05/aaem-11-e38.PMC10197918.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v11i1.1974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Artificial Inteligence (AI) application in emergency medicine is subject to ethical and legal inconsistencies. The purposes of this study were to map the extent of AI applications in emergency medicine, to identify ethical issues related to the use of AI, and to propose an ethical framework for its use.
Methods: A comprehensive literature collection was compiled through electronic databases/internet search engines (PubMed, Web of Science Platform, MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar/Academia, and ERIC) and reference lists. We considered studies published between 1 January 2014 and 6 October 2022. Articles that did not self-classify as studies of an AI intervention, those that were not relevant to Emergency Departments (EDs), and articles that did not report outcomes or evaluations were excluded. Descriptive and thematic analyses of data extracted from the included articles were conducted.
Results: A total of 137 out of the 2175 citations in the original database were eligible for full-text evaluation. Of these articles, 47 were included in the scoping review and considered for theme extraction. This review covers seven main areas of AI techniques in emergency medicine: Machine Learning (ML) Algorithms (10.64%), prehospital emergency management (12.76%), triage, patient acuity and disposition of patients (19.15%), disease and condition prediction (23.40%), emergency department management (17.03%), the future impact of AI on Emergency Medical Services (EMS) (8.51%), and ethical issues (8.51%).
Conclusion: There has been a rapid increase in AI research in emergency medicine in recent years. Several studies have demonstrated the potential of AI in diverse contexts, particularly when improving patient outcomes through predictive modelling. According to the synthesis of studies in our review, AI-based decision-making lacks transparency. This feature makes AI decision-making opaque.
简介:人工智能(AI)在急诊医学中的应用受到伦理和法律的不一致。本研究的目的是绘制人工智能在急诊医学中的应用范围,确定与人工智能使用相关的伦理问题,并提出人工智能使用的伦理框架。方法:通过电子数据库/互联网搜索引擎(PubMed、Web of Science Platform、MEDLINE、Scopus、Google Scholar/Academia和ERIC)和参考文献列表进行综合文献收集。我们考虑了2014年1月1日至2022年10月6日之间发表的研究。没有自我归类为人工智能干预研究的文章,与急诊科(EDs)无关的文章,以及没有报告结果或评估的文章被排除在外。对从纳入的文章中提取的数据进行了描述性和专题分析。结果:原数据库2175篇引文中有137篇符合全文评价条件。在这些文章中,有47篇被纳入范围审查,并考虑进行主题提取。本综述涵盖了人工智能技术在急诊医学中的七个主要领域:机器学习(ML)算法(10.64%)、院前急救管理(12.76%)、分诊、患者敏度和患者处置(19.15%)、疾病和状态预测(23.40%)、急诊科管理(17.03%)、人工智能对急诊医疗服务(EMS)的未来影响(8.51%)和伦理问题(8.51%)。结论:近年来急诊医学中人工智能的研究迅速增加。几项研究已经证明了人工智能在不同情况下的潜力,特别是在通过预测建模改善患者预后方面。根据我们综述中的研究综合,基于人工智能的决策缺乏透明度。这一特性使得AI的决策变得不透明。