Do Proximal Risk Factors Mediate the Impact of Affect on Symptoms of Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder? An Extension of the Hierarchical Model of Cognitive Vulnerability.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Brandon Koscinski, Nicholas P Allan
{"title":"Do Proximal Risk Factors Mediate the Impact of Affect on Symptoms of Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder? An Extension of the Hierarchical Model of Cognitive Vulnerability.","authors":"Brandon Koscinski,&nbsp;Nicholas P Allan","doi":"10.1159/000527300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major depressive disorder (MDD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) are among the most prevalent forms of psychopathology. The hierarchical model of cognitive vulnerability proposes that higher order risk factors explain co-occurrence among internalizing disorders, whereas lower order risk factors explain discordance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (N = 646; mean age = 38.50, SD = 10.00; 49.2% female) were recruited from Amazon MTurk to complete self-report questionnaires related to psychopathology in the summer of 2020. Structural equation modeling was used to examine the relations that negative affect (NA) and positive affect (PA) share with MDD and GAD, through rumination and intolerance of uncertainty (IU), cross-sectionally.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When modeling both IU and depressive rumination together as explaining the indirect effects from affect to psychopathology, the association between NA and symptoms of MDD was explained by depressive rumination. There were no indirect effects from PA to MDD or GAD symptoms. When modeled separately, both risk factors explained the associations NA shared with MDD and GAD symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study extends the hierarchical model of cognitive vulnerability by finding that depressive rumination explains the association between NA and symptoms of MDD, even when controlling for IU.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000527300","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) are among the most prevalent forms of psychopathology. The hierarchical model of cognitive vulnerability proposes that higher order risk factors explain co-occurrence among internalizing disorders, whereas lower order risk factors explain discordance.

Methods: Participants (N = 646; mean age = 38.50, SD = 10.00; 49.2% female) were recruited from Amazon MTurk to complete self-report questionnaires related to psychopathology in the summer of 2020. Structural equation modeling was used to examine the relations that negative affect (NA) and positive affect (PA) share with MDD and GAD, through rumination and intolerance of uncertainty (IU), cross-sectionally.

Results: When modeling both IU and depressive rumination together as explaining the indirect effects from affect to psychopathology, the association between NA and symptoms of MDD was explained by depressive rumination. There were no indirect effects from PA to MDD or GAD symptoms. When modeled separately, both risk factors explained the associations NA shared with MDD and GAD symptoms.

Conclusions: The present study extends the hierarchical model of cognitive vulnerability by finding that depressive rumination explains the association between NA and symptoms of MDD, even when controlling for IU.

近端危险因素是否介导情绪对广泛性焦虑障碍和重度抑郁障碍症状的影响?认知脆弱性层次模型的扩展。
背景:重度抑郁障碍(MDD)和广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)是精神病理学中最普遍的形式。认知脆弱性的层次模型认为,高阶风险因素解释了内化障碍之间的共发生,而低阶风险因素解释了不一致。方法:参与者(N = 646;平均年龄38.50,SD = 10.00;(49.2%为女性)于2020年夏季从亚马逊MTurk招募,完成与精神病理学相关的自我报告问卷。采用结构方程模型,通过反刍和不确定性不耐受(IU),横断面研究消极情绪(NA)和积极情绪(PA)与MDD和GAD的关系。结果:当模拟IU和抑郁反刍共同解释从情感到精神病理的间接影响时,NA和重度抑郁症症状之间的关联可以通过抑郁反刍来解释。PA对MDD或GAD症状没有间接影响。当单独建模时,这两个风险因素都解释了NA与MDD和GAD症状的关联。结论:本研究扩展了认知脆弱性的层次模型,发现抑郁反刍解释了NA和重度抑郁症症状之间的关联,即使在控制IU的情况下也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信