Challenges to the Implementation of the World Health Organization's International Classification for Patient Safety in Slovenia.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Quality Management in Health Care Pub Date : 2023-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-06 DOI:10.1097/QMH.0000000000000356
Vesna Zupančič, Torsten Breuerbach Larsen
{"title":"Challenges to the Implementation of the World Health Organization's International Classification for Patient Safety in Slovenia.","authors":"Vesna Zupančič,&nbsp;Torsten Breuerbach Larsen","doi":"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Slovenia lags behind international recommendations for reporting and learning from patient safety incidents and risk management in health care. To counter this, the country established the SenSys project, which receives technical support from the European Commission's Structural Reform Support Service, in cooperation with the Danish Patient Safety Authority, and pertains to an initiative to improve health care. A subproject of the SenSys project works to adapt and implement the International Classification for Patient Safety of the World Health Organization (ICPS-WHO). This article presents a case study of the national research process to identify the necessary Slovenian national adaptation and upgrade of the ICPS-WHO, the ICPS-SL, particularly regarding types of patient safety incidents. Our aim was to reflect on how we used the insights from different research elements and learned from different aspects of our project/system development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards of Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) to present our case study. The methods used to collect information on the necessary adaptations to establish an optimal ICPS-SL included a literature review, qualitative analysis of national consultation meetings, and a 2-cycle Delphi study. This process took place between January 2018 and August 2019, and we found 18 useful articles. Participants such as providers, users, and national bodies from national consultation meetings were all key stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The relevant stakeholders agreed upon changes to the ICPS-WHO to implement in the ICPS-SL as an integrated part of a Slovenia's incident reporting and learning system. Notably, they implemented changes in terminology in the translation of some English terms. They also added or hierarchically reordered some patient safety incident types: for example, they added the nation-specific point \"treatment of pain\" as a type of patient safety incident. The stakeholders will also partially integrate the following indicators: monitoring systems, vigilance systems, and complaint systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Different research elements contributed to the ICPS-SL's new knowledge and more reliable development. We emphasized a cooperative process with a consensus-building approach while linking the knowledge, experience, and needs of various stakeholders. All interested parties adopted this process, aiming to establish conditions for national learning from patient safety incidents and better preventive action for health care quality and safety. Vertical and horizontal multidisciplinary teamwork was a focal point as well. Technical assistance proved especially useful. It is now necessary to clinically test the ICPS-SL classification framework as Slovenia's internationally harmonized standard, and have the Health Council adopt it for use both online and in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":20986,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Management in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000356","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Slovenia lags behind international recommendations for reporting and learning from patient safety incidents and risk management in health care. To counter this, the country established the SenSys project, which receives technical support from the European Commission's Structural Reform Support Service, in cooperation with the Danish Patient Safety Authority, and pertains to an initiative to improve health care. A subproject of the SenSys project works to adapt and implement the International Classification for Patient Safety of the World Health Organization (ICPS-WHO). This article presents a case study of the national research process to identify the necessary Slovenian national adaptation and upgrade of the ICPS-WHO, the ICPS-SL, particularly regarding types of patient safety incidents. Our aim was to reflect on how we used the insights from different research elements and learned from different aspects of our project/system development.

Methods: We used the SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards of Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) to present our case study. The methods used to collect information on the necessary adaptations to establish an optimal ICPS-SL included a literature review, qualitative analysis of national consultation meetings, and a 2-cycle Delphi study. This process took place between January 2018 and August 2019, and we found 18 useful articles. Participants such as providers, users, and national bodies from national consultation meetings were all key stakeholders.

Results: The relevant stakeholders agreed upon changes to the ICPS-WHO to implement in the ICPS-SL as an integrated part of a Slovenia's incident reporting and learning system. Notably, they implemented changes in terminology in the translation of some English terms. They also added or hierarchically reordered some patient safety incident types: for example, they added the nation-specific point "treatment of pain" as a type of patient safety incident. The stakeholders will also partially integrate the following indicators: monitoring systems, vigilance systems, and complaint systems.

Conclusion: Different research elements contributed to the ICPS-SL's new knowledge and more reliable development. We emphasized a cooperative process with a consensus-building approach while linking the knowledge, experience, and needs of various stakeholders. All interested parties adopted this process, aiming to establish conditions for national learning from patient safety incidents and better preventive action for health care quality and safety. Vertical and horizontal multidisciplinary teamwork was a focal point as well. Technical assistance proved especially useful. It is now necessary to clinically test the ICPS-SL classification framework as Slovenia's internationally harmonized standard, and have the Health Council adopt it for use both online and in practice.

斯洛文尼亚实施世界卫生组织国际患者安全分类面临的挑战。
背景和目标:斯洛文尼亚在报告和学习医疗保健中的患者安全事件和风险管理方面落后于国际建议。为了应对这种情况,该国建立了SenSys项目,该项目得到了欧盟委员会结构改革支持服务局的技术支持,并与丹麦患者安全局合作,属于改善医疗保健的举措。SenSys项目的一个子项目致力于调整和实施世界卫生组织的国际患者安全分类(ICPS-WHO)。本文介绍了国家研究过程的案例研究,以确定斯洛文尼亚对ICPS-WHO、ICPS-SL的必要国家适应和升级,特别是在患者安全事件类型方面。我们的目的是反思我们如何利用不同研究元素的见解,并从项目/系统开发的不同方面学习。方法:我们使用SQUIRE 2.0(卓越质量改进报告标准)来介绍我们的案例研究。用于收集建立最佳ICPS-SL所需调整信息的方法包括文献综述、国家咨询会议的定性分析和两个周期的德尔菲研究。这个过程发生在2018年1月至2019年8月之间,我们发现了18篇有用的文章。国家协商会议的提供者、用户和国家机构等参与者都是关键的利益攸关方。结果:相关利益攸关方同意对ICPS-WHO进行修改,将其作为斯洛文尼亚事件报告和学习系统的一个组成部分在ICPS-SL中实施。值得注意的是,他们在一些英语术语的翻译中对术语进行了更改。他们还添加或分层重新排序了一些患者安全事件类型:例如,他们添加了国家特定点“疼痛治疗”作为患者安全事件的一种类型。利益攸关方还将部分整合以下指标:监测系统、警戒系统和投诉系统。结论:不同的研究元素有助于ICPS-SL获得新的知识和更可靠的发展。我们强调了一个具有建立共识方法的合作进程,同时将各种利益攸关方的知识、经验和需求联系起来。所有相关方都采用了这一程序,旨在为全国从患者安全事件中学习创造条件,并为医疗质量和安全采取更好的预防行动。纵向和横向的多学科团队合作也是一个焦点。技术援助证明特别有用。现在有必要对ICPS-SL分类框架进行临床测试,将其作为斯洛文尼亚的国际统一标准,并让卫生委员会在网上和实践中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quality Management in Health Care
Quality Management in Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Quality Management in Health Care (QMHC) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for our readers to explore the theoretical, technical, and strategic elements of health care quality management. The journal''s primary focus is on organizational structure and processes as these affect the quality of care and patient outcomes. In particular, it: -Builds knowledge about the application of statistical tools, control charts, benchmarking, and other devices used in the ongoing monitoring and evaluation of care and of patient outcomes; -Encourages research in and evaluation of the results of various organizational strategies designed to bring about quantifiable improvements in patient outcomes; -Fosters the application of quality management science to patient care processes and clinical decision-making; -Fosters cooperation and communication among health care providers, payers and regulators in their efforts to improve the quality of patient outcomes; -Explores links among the various clinical, technical, administrative, and managerial disciplines involved in patient care, as well as the role and responsibilities of organizational governance in ongoing quality management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信