Patterns of Physical Activity Parenting Practices and Their Association With Children's Physical Activity Behaviors.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Childhood Obesity Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-31 DOI:10.1089/chi.2022.0226
Olivia De-Jongh González, Sarah M Hutchison, Claire N Tugault-Lafleur, Teresia M O'Connor, Sheryl O Hughes, Louise C Mâsse
{"title":"Patterns of Physical Activity Parenting Practices and Their Association With Children's Physical Activity Behaviors.","authors":"Olivia De-Jongh González, Sarah M Hutchison, Claire N Tugault-Lafleur, Teresia M O'Connor, Sheryl O Hughes, Louise C Mâsse","doi":"10.1089/chi.2022.0226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Little is known about how parents combine multiple physical activity (PA) parenting practices (PAPP) and their relationship with their child's activity level. This study examined patterns of PAPP and their associations with sociodemographic characteristics and children's PA. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Parents of 5- to 12-year-olds (<i>n</i> = 618) completed the 65-items PAPP item-bank assessing their use of structured, autonomy promoting, and controlling PAPP, and reported their child's PA. Latent class analysis was used to uncover similar groups of parents based on their use of nine PAPP. Regression analyses evaluated associations between the latent classes, sociodemographic factors, and children's PA. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Four latent classes emerged: (1) <i>Indifferent</i> (30%)-parents who were unlikely to use any of the PAPP examined; (2) <i>Coercive</i> (23%)-parents using primarily controlling PAPP; (3) <i>Involved</i> (19%)-parents using most PAPP examined; and (4) <i>Supportive</i> (28%)-parents using primarily structured and autonomy promoting PAPP. <i>Involved</i> parents were younger than <i>Indifferent</i> and <i>Supportive</i> parents. <i>Supportive</i> parents reported the highest level of children's PA compared with all other groups, whereas <i>Coercive</i> parents reported the lowest level of children's PA. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Our findings showed that different latent classes exist among Canadian parents and that the combination of structured and autonomy promoting PAPP, when used without control, was associated with the highest PA level among children. The emergent latent classes are novel, theoretically meaningful, and key to inform family-based PA interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48842,"journal":{"name":"Childhood Obesity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Childhood Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2022.0226","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Little is known about how parents combine multiple physical activity (PA) parenting practices (PAPP) and their relationship with their child's activity level. This study examined patterns of PAPP and their associations with sociodemographic characteristics and children's PA. Methods: Parents of 5- to 12-year-olds (n = 618) completed the 65-items PAPP item-bank assessing their use of structured, autonomy promoting, and controlling PAPP, and reported their child's PA. Latent class analysis was used to uncover similar groups of parents based on their use of nine PAPP. Regression analyses evaluated associations between the latent classes, sociodemographic factors, and children's PA. Results: Four latent classes emerged: (1) Indifferent (30%)-parents who were unlikely to use any of the PAPP examined; (2) Coercive (23%)-parents using primarily controlling PAPP; (3) Involved (19%)-parents using most PAPP examined; and (4) Supportive (28%)-parents using primarily structured and autonomy promoting PAPP. Involved parents were younger than Indifferent and Supportive parents. Supportive parents reported the highest level of children's PA compared with all other groups, whereas Coercive parents reported the lowest level of children's PA. Conclusions: Our findings showed that different latent classes exist among Canadian parents and that the combination of structured and autonomy promoting PAPP, when used without control, was associated with the highest PA level among children. The emergent latent classes are novel, theoretically meaningful, and key to inform family-based PA interventions.

亲子体育锻炼实践模式及其与儿童体育锻炼行为的关系。
背景:人们对父母如何将多种体育活动(PA)养育方法(PAPP)结合起来及其与子女活动水平的关系知之甚少。本研究探讨了父母多种体育锻炼做法的模式及其与社会人口特征和儿童体育锻炼的关系。研究方法:5 至 12 岁儿童的父母(n = 618)填写了 65 个 PAPP 项目库,评估他们使用结构性、促进自主性和控制性 PAPP 的情况,并报告了他们孩子的 PA。通过潜类分析,我们根据家长使用九项 PAPP 的情况发现了相似的家长群体。回归分析评估了潜类、社会人口因素和儿童 PA 之间的关联。结果显示出现了四个潜在类别:(1) 冷漠型(30%)--父母不太可能使用任何一种所研究的家长参与方式;(2) 强迫型(23%)--父母主要使用控制型家长参与方式;(3) 参与型(19%)--父母使用大多数所研究的家长参与方式;(4) 支持型(28%)--父母主要使用结构化和促进自主的家长参与方式。参与型家长比冷漠型和支持型家长更年轻。与所有其他组别相比,支持型家长报告的儿童 PA 水平最高,而胁迫型家长报告的儿童 PA 水平最低。结论:我们的研究结果表明,加拿大家长中存在着不同的潜在类别,在不加控制的情况下,结构化和促进自主性的 PAPP 组合与最高的儿童 PA 水平相关。新出现的潜在类别是新颖的、有理论意义的,是为基于家庭的 PA 干预提供信息的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Childhood Obesity
Childhood Obesity PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Childhood Obesity is the only peer-reviewed journal that delivers actionable, real-world obesity prevention and weight management strategies for children and adolescents. Health disparities and cultural sensitivities are addressed, and plans and protocols are recommended to effect change at the family, school, and community level. The Journal also reports on the problem of access to effective healthcare and delivers evidence-based solutions to overcome these barriers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信