Three-dimensional comparison of tooth-borne and tooth-bone-borne RME appliances: a randomized controlled trial with 5-year follow-up.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Farhan Bazargani, Vanessa Knode, Alexander Plaksin, Anders Magnuson, Björn Ludwig
{"title":"Three-dimensional comparison of tooth-borne and tooth-bone-borne RME appliances: a randomized controlled trial with 5-year follow-up.","authors":"Farhan Bazargani, Vanessa Knode, Alexander Plaksin, Anders Magnuson, Björn Ludwig","doi":"10.1093/ejo/cjad024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the long-term skeletal effects of tooth-borne (TB) and tooth-bone-borne (TBB) rapid maxillary expansion in growing children, using 3D imaging.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In total, 52 consecutive patients who met the eligibility criteria were recruited and allocated to either the TB group, mean age 9.3 years (SD 1.3), or the TBB group, mean age 9.5 years (SD 1.2). Cone-beam computed tomography records and plaster models were taken before (T0), directly after (T1), 1 year after (T2), and 5 years after expansion (T3).</p><p><strong>Randomization: </strong>Participants were randomly allocated in blocks of different sizes, using the concealed allocation principle in a 1:1 ratio. The randomization list was also stratified by sex to ensure homogeneity between groups.</p><p><strong>Blinding: </strong>Due to clinical limitations, only the outcome assessors were blinded to the groups to which the patients were allocated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At T1, the midpalatal suture at its anterior part showed a statistically significant difference between the groups with a mean of 0.6 mm (CI 0.2-1.1) more expansion in the TBB group (P < 0.01). This difference was also more evident in boys at T1 with a mean of 0.8 mm (CI 0.2-1.4) (P < 0.01). These differences, however, blotted out at T2 and T3. The nasal width also showed similar differences between the groups, with a significantly larger expansion in the TBB group by a mean of 0.7 mm (CI 0.1-1.4) (P = 0.03). This group difference in favour of the TBB group was maintained at T2 (1.6 mm) and T3 (2.1 mm) (P < 0.01 T2 and T3, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Skeletal expansion in the midpalatal suture was significantly higher in the TBB group; however, the magnitude of this expansion was around 0.6 mm more and may not be clinically significant. Skeletal expansion at the level of the nasal cavity was significantly higher in the TBB group. There were no differences between boys and girls with regard to skeletal expansion.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial was not registered on any external sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":11989,"journal":{"name":"European journal of orthodontics","volume":" ","pages":"690-702"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjad024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the long-term skeletal effects of tooth-borne (TB) and tooth-bone-borne (TBB) rapid maxillary expansion in growing children, using 3D imaging.

Materials and methods: In total, 52 consecutive patients who met the eligibility criteria were recruited and allocated to either the TB group, mean age 9.3 years (SD 1.3), or the TBB group, mean age 9.5 years (SD 1.2). Cone-beam computed tomography records and plaster models were taken before (T0), directly after (T1), 1 year after (T2), and 5 years after expansion (T3).

Randomization: Participants were randomly allocated in blocks of different sizes, using the concealed allocation principle in a 1:1 ratio. The randomization list was also stratified by sex to ensure homogeneity between groups.

Blinding: Due to clinical limitations, only the outcome assessors were blinded to the groups to which the patients were allocated.

Results: At T1, the midpalatal suture at its anterior part showed a statistically significant difference between the groups with a mean of 0.6 mm (CI 0.2-1.1) more expansion in the TBB group (P < 0.01). This difference was also more evident in boys at T1 with a mean of 0.8 mm (CI 0.2-1.4) (P < 0.01). These differences, however, blotted out at T2 and T3. The nasal width also showed similar differences between the groups, with a significantly larger expansion in the TBB group by a mean of 0.7 mm (CI 0.1-1.4) (P = 0.03). This group difference in favour of the TBB group was maintained at T2 (1.6 mm) and T3 (2.1 mm) (P < 0.01 T2 and T3, respectively).

Conclusions: Skeletal expansion in the midpalatal suture was significantly higher in the TBB group; however, the magnitude of this expansion was around 0.6 mm more and may not be clinically significant. Skeletal expansion at the level of the nasal cavity was significantly higher in the TBB group. There were no differences between boys and girls with regard to skeletal expansion.

Trial registration: This trial was not registered on any external sites.

牙载和牙骨载RME矫治器的三维比较:一项5年随访的随机对照试验。
目的:利用三维成像技术比较牙源性(TB)和牙源性(TBB)上颌快速扩张对生长中的儿童的长期骨骼影响。材料和方法:总共招募了52例符合资格标准的连续患者,并将其分配到TB组(平均年龄9.3岁(SD 1.3))或TBB组(平均年龄9.5岁(SD 1.2))。分别在(T0)前、(T1)后、(T2)后1年和(T3)后5年拍摄锥束计算机断层扫描记录和石膏模型。随机化:采用1:1的隐性分配原则,将参与者随机分配到不同大小的区块中。随机列表也按性别分层,以确保组间的均匀性。盲法:由于临床限制,只有结果评估者对患者被分配到的组不知情。结果:T1时,TBB组中腭前段缝线平均扩大0.6 mm (CI 0.2 ~ 1.1),两组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。这一差异在T1时的男孩中更为明显,平均为0.8 mm (CI 0.2 ~ 1.4) (P < 0.01)。然而,这些差异在T2和T3时消失了。两组鼻宽也有相似的差异,TBB组鼻宽明显增大,平均增大0.7 mm (CI 0.1 ~ 1.4) (P = 0.03)。TBB组在T2 (1.6 mm)和T3 (2.1 mm)时保持了组间差异(分别P < 0.01)。结论:TBB组中腭缝合线骨扩张明显增高;然而,这种扩张的幅度约为0.6 mm,可能没有临床意义。TBB组鼻腔水平骨扩张明显增高。男孩和女孩在骨骼扩张方面没有差异。试验注册:本试验未在任何外部网站注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European journal of orthodontics
European journal of orthodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthodontics publishes papers of excellence on all aspects of orthodontics including craniofacial development and growth. The emphasis of the journal is on full research papers. Succinct and carefully prepared papers are favoured in terms of impact as well as readability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信