Higher self-perceived stress reactivity is associated with increased chronic pain risk.

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Brandon L Boring, Alison Richter, Vani A Mathur
{"title":"Higher self-perceived stress reactivity is associated with increased chronic pain risk.","authors":"Brandon L Boring,&nbsp;Alison Richter,&nbsp;Vani A Mathur","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Experiencing stress can contribute to unfavorable pain experiences, but outcomes vary across individuals. Evidence suggests that a person's specific reactivity to stressful events may influence pain responses. Previous studies measuring physiological stress reactivity have found associations with pain both clinically and in the laboratory. However, the time and cost required for testing physiological stress reactivity may limit clinical application.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Self-reported perception of one's own stress reactivity has been shown to correlate with physiological stress reactivity in relation to health outcomes and may represent a valuable tool in clinical pain assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the Midlife in the US survey, we selected participants who did not have chronic pain at baseline (n = 1512) and who had data at follow-up 9 years later. Stress reactivity was assessed using a subscale of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. We conducted a binary logistic regression to determine the odds of developing chronic pain, controlling for demographics and other health-related variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicate that higher reported stress reactivity at baseline increased the odds of developing chronic pain at follow-up (odds ratio (OR) = 1.085, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.021, 1.153), <i>P</i> = 0.008), with the only other significant predictor being the number of chronic conditions (OR = 1.118, 95% CI (1.045, 1.197), <i>P</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings provide evidence for the predictive criterion validity of self-reported stress reactivity in the context of chronic pain risk. More generally, with increased need for virtual assessment and care, self-reported stress reactivity may be a useful, time-efficient, and cost-efficient tool for predicting pain outcomes in research and clinical contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f0/ef/painreports-8-e1068.PMC10036055.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Experiencing stress can contribute to unfavorable pain experiences, but outcomes vary across individuals. Evidence suggests that a person's specific reactivity to stressful events may influence pain responses. Previous studies measuring physiological stress reactivity have found associations with pain both clinically and in the laboratory. However, the time and cost required for testing physiological stress reactivity may limit clinical application.

Objective: Self-reported perception of one's own stress reactivity has been shown to correlate with physiological stress reactivity in relation to health outcomes and may represent a valuable tool in clinical pain assessment.

Methods: Using data from the Midlife in the US survey, we selected participants who did not have chronic pain at baseline (n = 1512) and who had data at follow-up 9 years later. Stress reactivity was assessed using a subscale of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. We conducted a binary logistic regression to determine the odds of developing chronic pain, controlling for demographics and other health-related variables.

Results: Results indicate that higher reported stress reactivity at baseline increased the odds of developing chronic pain at follow-up (odds ratio (OR) = 1.085, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.021, 1.153), P = 0.008), with the only other significant predictor being the number of chronic conditions (OR = 1.118, 95% CI (1.045, 1.197), P = 0.001).

Conclusion: Findings provide evidence for the predictive criterion validity of self-reported stress reactivity in the context of chronic pain risk. More generally, with increased need for virtual assessment and care, self-reported stress reactivity may be a useful, time-efficient, and cost-efficient tool for predicting pain outcomes in research and clinical contexts.

较高的自我感知压力反应与慢性疼痛风险增加有关。
导读:经历压力会导致不利的疼痛体验,但结果因人而异。有证据表明,一个人对压力事件的特定反应可能会影响疼痛反应。以往测量生理应激反应的研究已经在临床和实验室中发现了与疼痛的关联。然而,测试生理应激反应性所需的时间和成本可能会限制临床应用。目的:一个人对自身应激反应的自我报告感知已被证明与与健康结果相关的生理应激反应相关,可能是临床疼痛评估的一个有价值的工具。方法:使用来自美国中年调查的数据,我们选择了基线时没有慢性疼痛的参与者(n = 1512),并在9年后的随访中有数据。使用多维人格问卷的子量表评估压力反应。我们进行了二元逻辑回归,以确定发生慢性疼痛的几率,控制人口统计学和其他与健康相关的变量。结果:结果表明,基线时较高的应激反应性增加了随访时发生慢性疼痛的几率(优势比(OR) = 1.085, 95%可信区间(CI) (1.021, 1.153), P = 0.008),唯一其他显著的预测因素是慢性疾病的数量(OR = 1.118, 95% CI (1.045, 1.197), P = 0.001)。结论:研究结果为慢性疼痛风险背景下自我报告应激反应的预测标准有效性提供了证据。更普遍的是,随着对虚拟评估和护理需求的增加,自我报告的应激反应可能是一种有用的、时间效率高的、成本效益高的工具,用于预测研究和临床环境中的疼痛结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Reports
Pain Reports Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
8 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信