COVID-19 and the great resignation: The role of death anxiety, need for meaningful work, and task significance.

IF 9.4 1区 心理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Journal of Applied Psychology Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1037/apl0001102
Minya Xu, Scott B Dust, Shengming Liu
{"title":"COVID-19 and the great resignation: The role of death anxiety, need for meaningful work, and task significance.","authors":"Minya Xu, Scott B Dust, Shengming Liu","doi":"10.1037/apl0001102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One of the most perplexing aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic is that although it created employment uncertainty, employees were reporting a higher-than-expected intent to turnover. To understand this COVID-19-induced \"Great Resignation,\" we applied terror management theory (TMT). Specifically, we hypothesized that death anxiety from COVID-19 indirectly relates to turnover intentions via the increase in the need for meaningful work, and that task significance would conditionally moderate this indirect effect. We tested these hypotheses across four studies, including a multiwave field study, an online experiment study, a quasi-experiment study, and a field study based on five-wave longitudinal data collected weekly. Our findings illustrate that death anxiety caused by COVID-19 indirectly relates to turnover intentions via an increase in the need for meaningful work. Further, this effect holds at lower levels of task significance, but not at higher levels of task significance. This suggests that a job characteristic-task significance-can satisfy employees' death anxiety-induced increase in the need for meaningful work, such that it does not eventuate in increased turnover intentions. Theoretical and practical implications related to COVID-19 and TMT as it relates to work contexts are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1790-1811"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001102","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

One of the most perplexing aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic is that although it created employment uncertainty, employees were reporting a higher-than-expected intent to turnover. To understand this COVID-19-induced "Great Resignation," we applied terror management theory (TMT). Specifically, we hypothesized that death anxiety from COVID-19 indirectly relates to turnover intentions via the increase in the need for meaningful work, and that task significance would conditionally moderate this indirect effect. We tested these hypotheses across four studies, including a multiwave field study, an online experiment study, a quasi-experiment study, and a field study based on five-wave longitudinal data collected weekly. Our findings illustrate that death anxiety caused by COVID-19 indirectly relates to turnover intentions via an increase in the need for meaningful work. Further, this effect holds at lower levels of task significance, but not at higher levels of task significance. This suggests that a job characteristic-task significance-can satisfy employees' death anxiety-induced increase in the need for meaningful work, such that it does not eventuate in increased turnover intentions. Theoretical and practical implications related to COVID-19 and TMT as it relates to work contexts are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

COVID-19与大辞职:死亡焦虑的作用,对有意义的工作的需求,以及任务的重要性。
COVID-19大流行最令人困惑的一个方面是,尽管它造成了就业的不确定性,但员工报告的离职意愿高于预期。为了理解这种由covid -19引发的“大辞职”,我们应用了恐怖管理理论(TMT)。具体来说,我们假设COVID-19的死亡焦虑通过增加对有意义工作的需求而间接与离职意图相关,并且任务显著性会有条件地调节这种间接影响。我们通过四项研究验证了这些假设,包括多波场研究、在线实验研究、准实验研究和基于每周收集的五波纵向数据的现场研究。我们的研究结果表明,COVID-19引起的死亡焦虑通过增加对有意义的工作的需求间接与离职意图相关。此外,这种效应在较低水平的任务显著性中成立,但在较高水平的任务显著性中不成立。这表明工作特征-任务显著性-可以满足员工死亡焦虑引起的对有意义工作需求的增加,从而不会导致离职意愿的增加。讨论了与COVID-19和TMT相关的理论和实践意义,因为它与工作环境有关。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Psychology® focuses on publishing original investigations that contribute new knowledge and understanding to fields of applied psychology (excluding clinical and applied experimental or human factors, which are better suited for other APA journals). The journal primarily considers empirical and theoretical investigations that enhance understanding of cognitive, motivational, affective, and behavioral psychological phenomena in work and organizational settings. These phenomena can occur at individual, group, organizational, or cultural levels, and in various work settings such as business, education, training, health, service, government, or military institutions. The journal welcomes submissions from both public and private sector organizations, for-profit or nonprofit. It publishes several types of articles, including: 1.Rigorously conducted empirical investigations that expand conceptual understanding (original investigations or meta-analyses). 2.Theory development articles and integrative conceptual reviews that synthesize literature and generate new theories on psychological phenomena to stimulate novel research. 3.Rigorously conducted qualitative research on phenomena that are challenging to capture with quantitative methods or require inductive theory building.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信