Morphometry around Cochleostomy Site to Aid Safe Cochlear Implantation.

Q3 Medicine
Yellur Kavitha, Upendra Kumar Joish
{"title":"Morphometry around Cochleostomy Site to Aid Safe Cochlear Implantation.","authors":"Yellur Kavitha,&nbsp;Upendra Kumar Joish","doi":"10.22038/IJORL.2023.65579.3249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In morphologically normal-appearing inner ears, measurements of the distance between the round window and carotid canal (RCD), the maximum diameter of the basal turn of the cochlea next to the round window (BD), and the thickness of the promontory (PT) just lateral to the basal turn may be used as guide for safe cochleostomy and implant placement.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From January to March 2022, a cross-sectional observational study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital. The round window to carotid canal distance (RCD), the largest diameter of the cochlea's basal turn next to the round window (BD), and the thickness of the promontory immediately lateral to the basal turn (PT) were measured using CT temporal bone images of 150 persons without cochlear abnormalities. The values obtained were compared using Paired T-test for significance of difference between both genders and sides.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 150 participants-75 men and 75 women-with a mean age of 37.5 years were enrolled in the study. With a range of 7.18 mm to 10.52 mm, the mean RCD was 8.84 mm (SD 0.8 mm). The mean BD was 2.27 mm (SD 0.4 mm), while the mean PT was 1.15 mm (SD 0. mm). The values obtained did not differ significantly in both the genders and the right and left sides (p = 0.37 and 0.24, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study has defined and calculated pertinent measures at cochleostomy site that will aid safe electrode insertion and prevent misplacement.</p>","PeriodicalId":14607,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"35 128","pages":"119-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10209812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJORL.2023.65579.3249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In morphologically normal-appearing inner ears, measurements of the distance between the round window and carotid canal (RCD), the maximum diameter of the basal turn of the cochlea next to the round window (BD), and the thickness of the promontory (PT) just lateral to the basal turn may be used as guide for safe cochleostomy and implant placement.

Materials and methods: From January to March 2022, a cross-sectional observational study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital. The round window to carotid canal distance (RCD), the largest diameter of the cochlea's basal turn next to the round window (BD), and the thickness of the promontory immediately lateral to the basal turn (PT) were measured using CT temporal bone images of 150 persons without cochlear abnormalities. The values obtained were compared using Paired T-test for significance of difference between both genders and sides.

Results: A total of 150 participants-75 men and 75 women-with a mean age of 37.5 years were enrolled in the study. With a range of 7.18 mm to 10.52 mm, the mean RCD was 8.84 mm (SD 0.8 mm). The mean BD was 2.27 mm (SD 0.4 mm), while the mean PT was 1.15 mm (SD 0. mm). The values obtained did not differ significantly in both the genders and the right and left sides (p = 0.37 and 0.24, respectively).

Conclusion: The present study has defined and calculated pertinent measures at cochleostomy site that will aid safe electrode insertion and prevent misplacement.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

人工耳蜗造口术周围形态测量有助于安全人工耳蜗植入。
在形态正常的内耳中,测量圆窗与颈动脉管之间的距离(RCD)、靠近圆窗的耳蜗基底匝的最大直径(BD)以及基底匝侧侧耳蜗角(PT)的厚度可以作为安全的耳蜗造口术和植入物的指导。材料与方法:于2022年1 - 3月在某三级医院进行横断面观察性研究。利用150例无耳蜗异常患者的颞骨CT图像,测量了圆窗到颈动脉管的距离(RCD)、靠近圆窗的耳蜗基底转角的最大直径(BD)和基底转角直接外侧的海岬厚度(PT)。所得值采用配对t检验比较男女、双方差异的显著性。结果:共有150名参与者——75名男性和75名女性——平均年龄为37.5岁。在7.18 ~ 10.52 mm范围内,平均RCD为8.84 mm (SD为0.8 mm)。平均BD为2.27 mm (SD 0.4 mm),平均PT为1.15 mm (SD 0。毫米)。所得值在两性和左右两侧无显著差异(p分别= 0.37和0.24)。结论:本研究定义并计算了耳蜗造口部位的相关措施,有助于安全电极插入,防止电极错位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信