Brief training in ultrasound equips novice clinicians to accurately and reliably measure jugular venous pressure in obese patients

Q3 Medicine
Nicholas A. Pettit, Benjamin S. Pedroja, Hsin Fang Li, Michael Sutcliffe
{"title":"Brief training in ultrasound equips novice clinicians to accurately and reliably measure jugular venous pressure in obese patients","authors":"Nicholas A. Pettit,&nbsp;Benjamin S. Pedroja,&nbsp;Hsin Fang Li,&nbsp;Michael Sutcliffe","doi":"10.1002/ajum.12336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction/Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Measurement of jugular venous pressure (JVP) by novice clinicians can be unreliable, particularly when evaluating obese patients. Measurement of JVP using ultrasound (uJVP) is simple to perform and provides accurate measurements. This study evaluated whether students and residents inexperienced with ultrasound could rapidly be taught to measure JVP using ultrasound in obese patients with the same accuracy as cardiologists measuring JVP via physical examination. Additionally, this study also evaluated the correlation between qualitative and quantitative JVP assessment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This prospective, blinded study compared uJVP measurements performed by novice clinicians after brief training to JVP measurements performed by cardiologists (cJVP) on physical examination. Association between uJVP and cJVP was assessed using linear correlation, agreement and bias were assessed using the Bland–Altman analysis and inter-rater reliability of uJVP was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The association between qualitative and quantitative JVP assessment was assessed using linear correlation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Novice clinicians (n = 16) obtained 34 measurements from 26 patients (mean BMI 35.5) and reported moderate-to-high confidence in all measurements. uJVP correlated well with cJVP (r = 0.73) with an average error of 0.06 cm. The estimated uJVP ICC was 0.83 (95% CI = 0.44, 0.96). Qualitative uJVP had only a moderate correlation (r = 0.63) to quantitative uJVP.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Novice clinicians often have difficulty assessing JVP on physical examination, particularly in obese patients. Our findings show a high degree of correlation between JVP measurements performed by novice clinicians using ultrasound compared with JVP measurements made by experienced cardiologists on physical examination. Furthermore, novice clinicians were able to be trained quickly, their measurements were determined to be accurate and precise and they expressed moderate-to-high confidence in their results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>After brief training, novice clinicians were able to accurately assess JVP in obese patients as compared to measurements made by experienced cardiologists on physical examination. Results suggest that ultrasound may greatly improve novice clinicians’ JVP assessment accuracy, particularly in obese patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"85-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajum.12336","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajum.12336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction/Purpose

Measurement of jugular venous pressure (JVP) by novice clinicians can be unreliable, particularly when evaluating obese patients. Measurement of JVP using ultrasound (uJVP) is simple to perform and provides accurate measurements. This study evaluated whether students and residents inexperienced with ultrasound could rapidly be taught to measure JVP using ultrasound in obese patients with the same accuracy as cardiologists measuring JVP via physical examination. Additionally, this study also evaluated the correlation between qualitative and quantitative JVP assessment.

Methods

This prospective, blinded study compared uJVP measurements performed by novice clinicians after brief training to JVP measurements performed by cardiologists (cJVP) on physical examination. Association between uJVP and cJVP was assessed using linear correlation, agreement and bias were assessed using the Bland–Altman analysis and inter-rater reliability of uJVP was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The association between qualitative and quantitative JVP assessment was assessed using linear correlation.

Results

Novice clinicians (n = 16) obtained 34 measurements from 26 patients (mean BMI 35.5) and reported moderate-to-high confidence in all measurements. uJVP correlated well with cJVP (r = 0.73) with an average error of 0.06 cm. The estimated uJVP ICC was 0.83 (95% CI = 0.44, 0.96). Qualitative uJVP had only a moderate correlation (r = 0.63) to quantitative uJVP.

Discussion

Novice clinicians often have difficulty assessing JVP on physical examination, particularly in obese patients. Our findings show a high degree of correlation between JVP measurements performed by novice clinicians using ultrasound compared with JVP measurements made by experienced cardiologists on physical examination. Furthermore, novice clinicians were able to be trained quickly, their measurements were determined to be accurate and precise and they expressed moderate-to-high confidence in their results.

Conclusions

After brief training, novice clinicians were able to accurately assess JVP in obese patients as compared to measurements made by experienced cardiologists on physical examination. Results suggest that ultrasound may greatly improve novice clinicians’ JVP assessment accuracy, particularly in obese patients.

简短的超声培训使临床医生新手能够准确可靠地测量肥胖患者的颈静脉压
临床新手测量颈静脉压(JVP)可能不可靠,尤其是在评估肥胖患者时。使用超声波(uJVP)测量JVP操作简单,测量结果准确。本研究评估了没有超声经验的学生和住院医生是否可以被快速教导使用超声测量肥胖患者的JVP,其准确性与心脏病专家通过身体检查测量JVP相同。此外,本研究还评估了定性和定量JVP评估之间的相关性。方法:这项前瞻性、盲法研究比较了临床新手在接受简短培训后测量的uJVP与心内科医生(cJVP)在体检时测量的uJVP。采用线性相关评估uJVP与cJVP之间的相关性,采用Bland-Altman分析评估一致性和偏倚,采用类内相关系数(ICC)评估uJVP的等级间信度。定性和定量JVP评估之间的关系采用线性相关评估。结果16名临床新手从26名患者(平均BMI为35.5)中获得34项测量结果,并对所有测量结果报告了中等至高的置信度。uJVP与cJVP相关性良好(r = 0.73),平均误差为0.06 cm。估计uJVP ICC为0.83 (95% CI = 0.44, 0.96)。定性uJVP与定量uJVP只有中度相关(r = 0.63)。临床新手在体格检查中常常难以评估JVP,尤其是肥胖患者。我们的研究结果表明,新手临床医生使用超声波进行的JVP测量与经验丰富的心脏病专家在身体检查中进行的JVP测量之间存在高度相关性。此外,临床医生新手能够快速接受培训,他们的测量被确定为准确和精确,他们对自己的结果表示中等到高度的信心。结论:经过简短的培训,与经验丰富的心脏病专家在体检时的测量结果相比,临床医生新手能够准确地评估肥胖患者的JVP。结果表明,超声可以大大提高临床新手对JVP的评估准确性,特别是对肥胖患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信