Efficacy of Tubal Surgery for Permanent Contraception: Considerations for the Clinician.

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Open access journal of contraception Pub Date : 2023-03-17 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAJC.S385255
Julia Tasset, Jeffrey T Jensen
{"title":"Efficacy of Tubal Surgery for Permanent Contraception: Considerations for the Clinician.","authors":"Julia Tasset,&nbsp;Jeffrey T Jensen","doi":"10.2147/OAJC.S385255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Permanent contraception meets the needs of many people certain in their decision to never become pregnant in the future. Female permanent contraception procedures became more common than male procedures during the 1970s and 1980s, when laparoscopic surgery became widely available. To better understand the efficacy of these new procedures, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducted a prospective cohort study, known as the Collaborative Review of Sterilization (CREST). For decades, results of this study have defined perioperative counseling around failure risks of such surgeries. However, laparoscopic technology and techniques have changed significantly in recent decades and evidence has emerged supporting noncontraceptive benefits of tubal excision. Therefore, we present here a review of updated information regarding permanent contraception failure in the modern context and implications for clinical practice and future research directions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74348,"journal":{"name":"Open access journal of contraception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/23/85/oajc-14-53.PMC10029365.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open access journal of contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S385255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Permanent contraception meets the needs of many people certain in their decision to never become pregnant in the future. Female permanent contraception procedures became more common than male procedures during the 1970s and 1980s, when laparoscopic surgery became widely available. To better understand the efficacy of these new procedures, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducted a prospective cohort study, known as the Collaborative Review of Sterilization (CREST). For decades, results of this study have defined perioperative counseling around failure risks of such surgeries. However, laparoscopic technology and techniques have changed significantly in recent decades and evidence has emerged supporting noncontraceptive benefits of tubal excision. Therefore, we present here a review of updated information regarding permanent contraception failure in the modern context and implications for clinical practice and future research directions.

输卵管手术治疗永久性避孕的疗效:临床医生的注意事项。
永久避孕满足了许多人的需求,他们决定在未来永远不要怀孕。在20世纪70年代和80年代,当腹腔镜手术广泛应用时,女性永久避孕手术变得比男性更常见。为了更好地了解这些新程序的疗效,美国疾病控制和预防中心进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,称为绝育协作审查(CREST)。几十年来,这项研究的结果已经确定了围绕此类手术失败风险的围手术期咨询。然而,近几十年来,腹腔镜技术和技术发生了重大变化,有证据支持输卵管切除术的非竞争性益处。因此,我们在这里回顾了现代背景下关于永久性避孕失败的最新信息,以及对临床实践和未来研究方向的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信