Dietary Diversity Predicts the Adequacy of Micronutrient Intake in 6- to 23-Month-Old Children Regardless of the Season in Rural Southern Benin.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Waliou Amoussa Hounkpatin, Elie Koukou, Céline Termote, Gervais Ntandou-Bouzitou, Irène Mitchodigni, Sam Bodjrènou, Halima Alaofè
{"title":"Dietary Diversity Predicts the Adequacy of Micronutrient Intake in 6- to 23-Month-Old Children Regardless of the Season in Rural Southern Benin.","authors":"Waliou Amoussa Hounkpatin,&nbsp;Elie Koukou,&nbsp;Céline Termote,&nbsp;Gervais Ntandou-Bouzitou,&nbsp;Irène Mitchodigni,&nbsp;Sam Bodjrènou,&nbsp;Halima Alaofè","doi":"10.1177/03795721231164085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Infants and Young Children Dietary Diversity Score (IYC-DDS-7) has been validated to assess dietary quality in children. However, its applicability to predict the adequacy of micronutrient intake remains a challenge in all contexts.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>A 24-hour dietary recall assessment was conducted on a sample of 628 children aged 6 to 23 months in the plenty season (PS) as well as in the lean season (LS). The IYC-DDS-7 was calculated based on 7 food groups, whereas the mean micronutrient density adequacy (MMDA) for 11 micronutrients. The β regression models were used to assess the relationship between IYC-DDS and MMDA and differences in nutrient intake between the 2 seasons. A receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was also performed to determine IYC-DDS-7 cutoff levels that maximized sensitivity and specificity in assessing dietary quality and predicting MMDA below- or above-selected cutoff levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participating children's MMDA was 56.9% ± 12.8% versus 61.9% ± 8.6% and IYC-DDS-7 was 3.43 ± 1.5 versus 3.77 ± 1.0 in the PS and LS. The IYC-DDS-7 had a positive correlation with MMDA, irrespective of the season. For a 1-unit increase in IYC-DDS-7, MMDA increased by a mean of 10.7% (CI, 8.3%-13.1%; <i>P</i> < .001). The minimum threshold of the 4 food groups corresponded to a sensitivity of 76% and 61% and a specificity of 75% and 70% for the prediction of inadequate diet in the PS and LS, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IYC-DDS-7 predicted MMDA, regardless of seasons for infants and young children. The IYC-DDS-7 cutoff of 4 groups performed well in classifying children with low-diet quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":12394,"journal":{"name":"Food and Nutrition Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Nutrition Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03795721231164085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Infants and Young Children Dietary Diversity Score (IYC-DDS-7) has been validated to assess dietary quality in children. However, its applicability to predict the adequacy of micronutrient intake remains a challenge in all contexts.

Design and methods: A 24-hour dietary recall assessment was conducted on a sample of 628 children aged 6 to 23 months in the plenty season (PS) as well as in the lean season (LS). The IYC-DDS-7 was calculated based on 7 food groups, whereas the mean micronutrient density adequacy (MMDA) for 11 micronutrients. The β regression models were used to assess the relationship between IYC-DDS and MMDA and differences in nutrient intake between the 2 seasons. A receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was also performed to determine IYC-DDS-7 cutoff levels that maximized sensitivity and specificity in assessing dietary quality and predicting MMDA below- or above-selected cutoff levels.

Results: Participating children's MMDA was 56.9% ± 12.8% versus 61.9% ± 8.6% and IYC-DDS-7 was 3.43 ± 1.5 versus 3.77 ± 1.0 in the PS and LS. The IYC-DDS-7 had a positive correlation with MMDA, irrespective of the season. For a 1-unit increase in IYC-DDS-7, MMDA increased by a mean of 10.7% (CI, 8.3%-13.1%; P < .001). The minimum threshold of the 4 food groups corresponded to a sensitivity of 76% and 61% and a specificity of 75% and 70% for the prediction of inadequate diet in the PS and LS, respectively.

Conclusions: The IYC-DDS-7 predicted MMDA, regardless of seasons for infants and young children. The IYC-DDS-7 cutoff of 4 groups performed well in classifying children with low-diet quality.

在贝宁南部农村,无论季节如何,饮食多样性预测6至23个月大的儿童微量营养素摄入量是否充足。
背景:婴幼儿饮食多样性评分(IYC-DDS-7)已被验证用于评估儿童饮食质量。然而,它在预测微量营养素摄入是否充足方面的适用性在所有情况下仍然是一个挑战。设计与方法:对628名6 ~ 23月龄儿童在丰产季(PS)和丰产季(LS)进行24小时膳食回忆评价。IYC-DDS-7是基于7种食物组计算的,而11种微量营养素的平均微量营养素密度充足度(MMDA)。采用β回归模型评估IYC-DDS和MMDA与两季营养摄入差异的关系。还进行了患者工作特征曲线分析,以确定IYC-DDS-7截止水平,该截止水平在评估饮食质量和预测MMDA低于或高于选定的截止水平时具有最大的灵敏度和特异性。结果:PS组和LS组患儿MMDA分别为56.9%±12.8%和61.9%±8.6%,IYC-DDS-7分别为3.43±1.5和3.77±1.0。IYC-DDS-7与MMDA呈正相关,与季节无关。IYC-DDS-7每增加1个单位,MMDA平均增加10.7% (CI, 8.3%-13.1%;P < 0.001)。4种食物组的最小阈值分别对应于预测PS和LS中饮食不足的灵敏度为76%和61%,特异性为75%和70%。结论:IYC-DDS-7可预测婴幼儿MMDA,与季节无关。4组的IYC-DDS-7分界点对低饮食质量患儿的分类效果较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food and Nutrition Bulletin
Food and Nutrition Bulletin 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Food and Nutrition Bulletin (FNB,) is a peer-reviewed, academic journal published quarterly by the Nevin Scrimshaw International Nutrition Foundation. The Journal is one of the leading resources used by researchers, academics, nutrition policy makers and planners in over 125 countries to obtain the most current research and policy information related to nutrition in developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信