Anatomical differences of intracranial arteries according to sex: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
M.E.H. Ophelders , M.J.A. van Eldik , I.N. Vos , Y.S. Beentjes , B.K. Velthuis , Y.M. Ruigrok
{"title":"Anatomical differences of intracranial arteries according to sex: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"M.E.H. Ophelders ,&nbsp;M.J.A. van Eldik ,&nbsp;I.N. Vos ,&nbsp;Y.S. Beentjes ,&nbsp;B.K. Velthuis ,&nbsp;Y.M. Ruigrok","doi":"10.1016/j.neurad.2023.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Purpose</h3><p>Intracranial aneurysms are more common in women than in men. Some anatomical variants of the circle of Willis (CoW) are associated with a higher risk of developing intracranial aneurysms. We hypothesized that variations of the CoW are sex dependent which may partly explain why intracranial aneurysms are more common in women. We systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed the literature to compare the presence of anatomical variations of the CoW between women and men in the general population.</p></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><p>A systematic search in Pubmed and EMBASE using predefined criteria, following the PRISMA guidelines was performed. The presence of different CoW anatomical variants and a complete CoW was compared between women and men using an inverse variance weighted random effects meta-analysis to calculate relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fourteen studies were included reporting on 5478 healthy participants (2511 women, 2967 men). Bilateral fetal type posterior cerebral arteries (RR 2.79; 95%CI 1.65–4.72, I<sup>2</sup>=0%), and a complete CoW (RR 1.24, 95%CI 1.13–1.36; I<sup>2</sup>=0%) were more prevalent in women than in men. The variants absence or hypoplasia of one of the anterior cerebral arteries (RR 0.58, 95%CI 0.38–0.88, I<sup>2</sup>=57%) and hypoplasia or absence of both posterior communicating arteries (RR 0.79, 95%CI 0.71–0.87, I<sup>2</sup>=0%) were more prevalent in men.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Several anatomical variations of the CoW are sex dependent, with some variants being more common in women while others in men. Future research should assess how these sex-specific CoW variants relate to the sex-specific occurrence of intracranial aneurysms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0150986123002043/pdfft?md5=b3a3536322ab253d150012fb257ea1bb&pid=1-s2.0-S0150986123002043-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0150986123002043","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose

Intracranial aneurysms are more common in women than in men. Some anatomical variants of the circle of Willis (CoW) are associated with a higher risk of developing intracranial aneurysms. We hypothesized that variations of the CoW are sex dependent which may partly explain why intracranial aneurysms are more common in women. We systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed the literature to compare the presence of anatomical variations of the CoW between women and men in the general population.

Material and Methods

A systematic search in Pubmed and EMBASE using predefined criteria, following the PRISMA guidelines was performed. The presence of different CoW anatomical variants and a complete CoW was compared between women and men using an inverse variance weighted random effects meta-analysis to calculate relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

Results

Fourteen studies were included reporting on 5478 healthy participants (2511 women, 2967 men). Bilateral fetal type posterior cerebral arteries (RR 2.79; 95%CI 1.65–4.72, I2=0%), and a complete CoW (RR 1.24, 95%CI 1.13–1.36; I2=0%) were more prevalent in women than in men. The variants absence or hypoplasia of one of the anterior cerebral arteries (RR 0.58, 95%CI 0.38–0.88, I2=57%) and hypoplasia or absence of both posterior communicating arteries (RR 0.79, 95%CI 0.71–0.87, I2=0%) were more prevalent in men.

Conclusions

Several anatomical variations of the CoW are sex dependent, with some variants being more common in women while others in men. Future research should assess how these sex-specific CoW variants relate to the sex-specific occurrence of intracranial aneurysms.

颅内动脉在解剖学上的性别差异:系统回顾与荟萃分析
背景和目的颅内动脉瘤在女性中的发病率高于男性。威利斯圈(CoW)的某些解剖变异与颅内动脉瘤的高发病风险有关。我们假设威利斯圈的变异与性别有关,这可能是颅内动脉瘤更常见于女性的部分原因。我们对文献进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以比较普通人群中女性和男性的 CoW 解剖变异情况。采用反方差加权随机效应荟萃分析法比较了男女之间是否存在不同的CoW解剖变异和完整的CoW,计算出相对风险(RR)和95%置信区间(95% CI)。结果共纳入14项研究,报告了5478名健康参与者(2511名女性,2967名男性)。双侧胎儿型大脑后动脉(RR 2.79;95%CI 1.65-4.72,I2=0%)和完全CoW(RR 1.24,95%CI 1.13-1.36;I2=0%)在女性中的发病率高于男性。结论CoW的一些解剖变异与性别有关,一些变异在女性中更为常见,而另一些变异则在男性中更为常见。未来的研究应评估这些性别特异性CoW变异与颅内动脉瘤的性别特异性发生率之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroradiology
Journal of Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.70%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroradiology is a peer-reviewed journal, publishing worldwide clinical and basic research in the field of diagnostic and Interventional neuroradiology, translational and molecular neuroimaging, and artificial intelligence in neuroradiology. The Journal of Neuroradiology considers for publication articles, reviews, technical notes and letters to the editors (correspondence section), provided that the methodology and scientific content are of high quality, and that the results will have substantial clinical impact and/or physiological importance.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信