The Emotional Impact of Negative Language in People With Diabetes: A Descriptive Study Using a Semantic Differential Scale.

Jane K Dickinson, Susan J Guzman, Jennalee S Wooldridge
{"title":"The Emotional Impact of Negative Language in People With Diabetes: A Descriptive Study Using a Semantic Differential Scale.","authors":"Jane K Dickinson, Susan J Guzman, Jennalee S Wooldridge","doi":"10.1177/26350106231168326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Explore the emotional experience of people with diabetes as they encounter words and phrases that have been previously identified as problematic and evaluate potential differences in their emotional impact based on type of diabetes and demographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional descriptive study employing an online survey of 107 adults with type 1 diabetes and 110 adults with type 2 diabetes. A semantic differential scale was used to examine feeling states associated with negative diabetes language. Descriptive statistics including means, standard deviations, and frequencies were calculated for all study variables. For each target word, frequencies of participants who endorsed a positive, neutral, or negative affective response on the sematic differential scale are reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>People with diabetes reported feeling blamed, misunderstood, hopeless, judged, not motivated, and not trusting in response to \"noncompliant,\" \"unmotivated,\" \"in denial,\" \"preventable,\" \"failed,\" \"should,\" \"uncontrolled,\" \"what did you do wrong,\" and \"you could end up blind or on dialysis.\" Participants who have type 1 diabetes and are female, White, more educated, and younger reported more negative feelings about the target words.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>People with diabetes experience highly negative affective responses when they read and hear previously identified words and phrases considered to be judgmental and unhelpful.</p>","PeriodicalId":75187,"journal":{"name":"The science of diabetes self-management and care","volume":"49 3","pages":"193-205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The science of diabetes self-management and care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26350106231168326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Explore the emotional experience of people with diabetes as they encounter words and phrases that have been previously identified as problematic and evaluate potential differences in their emotional impact based on type of diabetes and demographic characteristics.

Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study employing an online survey of 107 adults with type 1 diabetes and 110 adults with type 2 diabetes. A semantic differential scale was used to examine feeling states associated with negative diabetes language. Descriptive statistics including means, standard deviations, and frequencies were calculated for all study variables. For each target word, frequencies of participants who endorsed a positive, neutral, or negative affective response on the sematic differential scale are reported.

Results: People with diabetes reported feeling blamed, misunderstood, hopeless, judged, not motivated, and not trusting in response to "noncompliant," "unmotivated," "in denial," "preventable," "failed," "should," "uncontrolled," "what did you do wrong," and "you could end up blind or on dialysis." Participants who have type 1 diabetes and are female, White, more educated, and younger reported more negative feelings about the target words.

Conclusion: People with diabetes experience highly negative affective responses when they read and hear previously identified words and phrases considered to be judgmental and unhelpful.

负面语言对糖尿病患者情绪的影响:使用语义差异量表的描述性研究
目的:探讨糖尿病患者在遇到以前被认定为有问题的单词和短语时的情绪体验,并评估这些单词和短语对糖尿病类型和人口特征的情绪影响的潜在差异:这是一项横断面描述性研究,对 107 名 1 型糖尿病成人患者和 110 名 2 型糖尿病成人患者进行了在线调查。采用语义差异量表来研究与糖尿病负面语言相关的感觉状态。对所有研究变量进行了描述性统计,包括平均值、标准差和频率。对于每个目标词,报告了参与者在语义差异量表中赞同积极、中性或消极情感反应的频率:结果:糖尿病患者在回答 "不遵守"、"不积极"、"否认"、"可预防"、"失败"、"应该"、"失控"、"你做错了什么 "和 "你可能最终失明或接受透析 "时,表示感到自责、被误解、绝望、被评判、没有动力和不信任。1型糖尿病患者中,女性、白人、受教育程度较高和年轻的人对目标词的负面情绪更多:结论:糖尿病患者在阅读和听到之前识别出的被认为具有评判性和无益性的词语和短语时,会产生非常负面的情绪反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信