{"title":"How Many Fenestrations Should I Make When Placing a Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant? A Laboratory Study.","authors":"Michael C Yang, Christopher D Yang, Ken Y Lin","doi":"10.18502/jovr.v18i2.13181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigates the effect of one versus two fenestrations on both fluid egress and opening pressure from a non-valved glaucoma implant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this laboratory study, we used an <i>in vitro</i> closed system comprised of ligated silicone tubing connected to a fluid reservoir and manometer to simulate the tubing found in a Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implant. Fenestrations were created using an 8-0 Vicryl TG140-8 suture needle. Main outcome measures included volume of fluid egress and fenestration opening pressures, which were measured via micropipette and increasing pressure until fluid egress was observed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was observed in fluid egress between tubing with one versus two fenestrations at pressures <math><mo>≤</mo></math>40 mmHg. At 50 mmHg, a statistically significant difference was observed in fluid egress between tubing with one versus two fenestrations (<i>P</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.05). The first fenestration opened at 10.5 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 3.77 mmHg and the second fenestration opened at 28.83 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 5.09 mmHg (average <math><mo>±</mo></math> standard deviation).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our <i>in vitro</i> findings suggest there may exist a critical pressure <math><mo>></mo></math>40 mmHg at which the second fenestration starts to play a significant role in fluid drainage. There may be no difference in the amount of fluid egress and effect on intraocular pressure between one or two tube fenestrations when preoperative intraocular pressure is <math><mo>≤</mo></math>40 mmHg.</p>","PeriodicalId":16586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","volume":"18 2","pages":"157-163"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172796/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v18i2.13181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigates the effect of one versus two fenestrations on both fluid egress and opening pressure from a non-valved glaucoma implant.
Methods: In this laboratory study, we used an in vitro closed system comprised of ligated silicone tubing connected to a fluid reservoir and manometer to simulate the tubing found in a Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implant. Fenestrations were created using an 8-0 Vicryl TG140-8 suture needle. Main outcome measures included volume of fluid egress and fenestration opening pressures, which were measured via micropipette and increasing pressure until fluid egress was observed.
Results: No significant difference was observed in fluid egress between tubing with one versus two fenestrations at pressures 40 mmHg. At 50 mmHg, a statistically significant difference was observed in fluid egress between tubing with one versus two fenestrations (P 0.05). The first fenestration opened at 10.5 3.77 mmHg and the second fenestration opened at 28.83 5.09 mmHg (average standard deviation).
Conclusion: Our in vitro findings suggest there may exist a critical pressure 40 mmHg at which the second fenestration starts to play a significant role in fluid drainage. There may be no difference in the amount of fluid egress and effect on intraocular pressure between one or two tube fenestrations when preoperative intraocular pressure is 40 mmHg.