Assessment of cognitive biases in Augmented Reality: Beyond eye tracking.

IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Eye Movement Research Pub Date : 2022-12-30 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.16910/jemr.15.3.4
Piotr Słowiński, Ben Grindley, Helen Muncie, David J Harris, Samuel J Vine, Mark R Wilson
{"title":"Assessment of cognitive biases in Augmented Reality: Beyond eye tracking.","authors":"Piotr Słowiński, Ben Grindley, Helen Muncie, David J Harris, Samuel J Vine, Mark R Wilson","doi":"10.16910/jemr.15.3.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We study an individual's propensity for rational thinking; the avoidance of cognitive biases (unconscious errors generated by our mental simplification methods) using a novel augmented reality (AR) platform. Specifically, we developed an odd-one-out (OOO) game-like task in AR designed to try to induce and assess confirmatory biases. Forty students completed the AR task in the laboratory, and the short form of the comprehensive assessment of rational thinking (CART) online via the Qualtrics platform. We demonstrate that behavioural markers (based on eye, hand and head movements) can be associated (linear regression) with the short CART score - more rational thinkers have slower head and hand movements and faster gaze movements in the second more ambiguous round of the OOO task. Furthermore, short CART scores can be associated with the change in behaviour between two rounds of the OOO task (one less and one more ambiguous) - hand-eye-head coordination patterns of the more rational thinkers are more consistent in the two rounds. Overall, we demonstrate the benefits of augmenting eye-tracking recordings with additional data modalities when trying to understand complicated behaviours.</p>","PeriodicalId":15813,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eye Movement Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10171922/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eye Movement Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.15.3.4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We study an individual's propensity for rational thinking; the avoidance of cognitive biases (unconscious errors generated by our mental simplification methods) using a novel augmented reality (AR) platform. Specifically, we developed an odd-one-out (OOO) game-like task in AR designed to try to induce and assess confirmatory biases. Forty students completed the AR task in the laboratory, and the short form of the comprehensive assessment of rational thinking (CART) online via the Qualtrics platform. We demonstrate that behavioural markers (based on eye, hand and head movements) can be associated (linear regression) with the short CART score - more rational thinkers have slower head and hand movements and faster gaze movements in the second more ambiguous round of the OOO task. Furthermore, short CART scores can be associated with the change in behaviour between two rounds of the OOO task (one less and one more ambiguous) - hand-eye-head coordination patterns of the more rational thinkers are more consistent in the two rounds. Overall, we demonstrate the benefits of augmenting eye-tracking recordings with additional data modalities when trying to understand complicated behaviours.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估增强现实技术中的认知偏差:超越眼动追踪
我们利用新颖的增强现实(AR)平台来研究个体的理性思维倾向;避免认知偏差(由我们的心理简化方法产生的无意识错误)。具体来说,我们在 AR 中开发了一个类似于奇数淘汰(OOO)游戏的任务,旨在尝试诱导和评估确认性偏差。40 名学生在实验室完成了 AR 任务,并通过 Qualtrics 平台在线完成了理性思维综合评估 (CART) 的简表。我们证明,行为标记(基于眼、手和头部运动)可以与简表 CART 分数相关联(线性回归)--在第二轮模棱两可的 OOO 任务中,理性思维更强的人头部和手部运动更慢,目光运动更快。此外,短 CART 分数还与两轮 OOO 任务(一轮模糊性较低,一轮模糊性较高)之间的行为变化有关--理性思维较强的人在两轮任务中的手眼头协调模式更加一致。总之,我们证明了在试图理解复杂行为时,使用其他数据模式来增强眼动跟踪记录的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
33.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Eye Movement Research is an open-access, peer-reviewed scientific periodical devoted to all aspects of oculomotor functioning including methodology of eye recording, neurophysiological and cognitive models, attention, reading, as well as applications in neurology, ergonomy, media research and other areas,
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信