Implicit and Explicit Dehumanization of Older Family Members: Novel Determinants of Elder Abuse Proclivity.

IF 2.7 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Stigma and Health Pub Date : 2023-02-01 Epub Date: 2022-03-17 DOI:10.1037/sah0000370
E-Shien Chang, Joan K Monin, Naomi Isenberg, Daniel Zelterman, Becca R Levy
{"title":"Implicit and Explicit Dehumanization of Older Family Members: Novel Determinants of Elder Abuse Proclivity.","authors":"E-Shien Chang, Joan K Monin, Naomi Isenberg, Daniel Zelterman, Becca R Levy","doi":"10.1037/sah0000370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Elder abuse affects one in six older persons globally. Three limitations impede progress in prevention: most research is victim- rather than perpetrator-based; the reliance on explicit, self-reported factors; and failure to account for psychological factors, such as dehumanization, that motivate abuse. The current study addressed these gaps by examining whether implicit and explicit dehumanization of t could explain elder abuse proclivity. In a web-based survey of 585 family caregivers of older persons, dehumanization was found to be prevalent with 51% of the caregivers implicitly and 31% explicitly dehumanizing older persons. As predicted, implicit and explicit dehumanization contributed to elder abuse proclivity (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.02-1.50, <i>p</i> = .03) and (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.05-1.51, <i>p</i> = .01), respectively, after adjusting for relevant covariates including caregiver burden, and caregivers' and care-recipients' health. Developing caregiver-based interventions to humanize older persons may complement ongoing efforts in reducing elder abuse.</p>","PeriodicalId":53222,"journal":{"name":"Stigma and Health","volume":"8 1","pages":"40-48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10120856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stigma and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Elder abuse affects one in six older persons globally. Three limitations impede progress in prevention: most research is victim- rather than perpetrator-based; the reliance on explicit, self-reported factors; and failure to account for psychological factors, such as dehumanization, that motivate abuse. The current study addressed these gaps by examining whether implicit and explicit dehumanization of t could explain elder abuse proclivity. In a web-based survey of 585 family caregivers of older persons, dehumanization was found to be prevalent with 51% of the caregivers implicitly and 31% explicitly dehumanizing older persons. As predicted, implicit and explicit dehumanization contributed to elder abuse proclivity (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.02-1.50, p = .03) and (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.05-1.51, p = .01), respectively, after adjusting for relevant covariates including caregiver burden, and caregivers' and care-recipients' health. Developing caregiver-based interventions to humanize older persons may complement ongoing efforts in reducing elder abuse.

对老年家庭成员的隐性和显性非人化:虐待老人倾向的新决定因素。
全球每六名老年人中就有一名受到虐待。有三个局限性阻碍了预防工作的进展:大多数研究以受害者而非施虐者为基础;依赖于明确的自我报告因素;没有考虑到非人化等促使虐待的心理因素。本研究针对这些不足之处,研究了老年人的隐性和显性非人化是否可以解释虐待倾向。在对 585 名老年人家庭照顾者进行的网络调查中发现,非人化现象十分普遍,51% 的照顾者对老年人存在隐性非人化,31% 的照顾者对老年人存在显性非人化。正如预测的那样,在调整了包括照顾者负担、照顾者和接受照顾者的健康状况在内的相关协变量后,隐性和显性非人化分别导致了虐待老人倾向(OR = 1.23,95% CI = 1.02-1.50,p = .03)和(OR = 1.26,95% CI = 1.05-1.51,p = .01)。开发基于照顾者的干预措施,使老年人人性化,可以补充目前在减少虐待老人方面所做的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stigma and Health
Stigma and Health Multiple-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
94
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信