A Pilot Validation Study Comparing Fluorescence-Imitating Brightfield Imaging, A Slide-Free Imaging Method, With Standard Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Hematoxylin-Eosin-Stained Tissue Section Histology for Primary Surgical Pathology Diagnosis.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Alexander D Borowsky, Richard M Levenson, Allen M Gown, Taryn Morningstar, Thomas A Fleury, Gregory Henderson, Kurt Schaberg, Amelia B Sybenga, Eric F Glassy, Sandra L Taylor, Farzad Fereidouni
{"title":"A Pilot Validation Study Comparing Fluorescence-Imitating Brightfield Imaging, A Slide-Free Imaging Method, With Standard Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Hematoxylin-Eosin-Stained Tissue Section Histology for Primary Surgical Pathology Diagnosis.","authors":"Alexander D Borowsky, Richard M Levenson, Allen M Gown, Taryn Morningstar, Thomas A Fleury, Gregory Henderson, Kurt Schaberg, Amelia B Sybenga, Eric F Glassy, Sandra L Taylor, Farzad Fereidouni","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2022-0432-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Digital pathology using whole slide images has been recently approved to support primary diagnosis in clinical surgical pathology practices. Here we describe a novel imaging method, fluorescence-imitating brightfield imaging, that can capture the surface of fresh tissue without requiring prior fixation, paraffin embedding, tissue sectioning, or staining.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To compare the ability of pathologists to evaluate direct-to-digital images with standard pathology preparations.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>One hundred surgical pathology samples were obtained. Samples were first digitally imaged, then processed for standard histologic examination on 4-μm hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections and digitally scanned. The resulting digital images from both digital and standard scan sets were viewed by each of 4 reading pathologists. The data set consisted of 100 reference diagnoses and 800 study pathologist reads. Each study read was compared to the reference diagnosis, and also compared to that reader's diagnosis across both modalities.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>The overall agreement rate, across 800 reads, was 97.9%. This consisted of 400 digital reads at 97.0% versus reference and 400 standard reads versus reference at 98.8%. Minor discordances (defined as alternative diagnoses without clinical treatment or outcome implications) were 6.1% overall, 7.2% for digital, and 5.0% for standard.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Pathologists can provide accurate diagnoses from fluorescence-imitating brightfield imaging slide-free images. Concordance and discordance rates are similar to published rates for comparisons of whole slide imaging to standard light microscopy of glass slides for primary diagnosis. It may be possible, therefore, to develop a slide-free, nondestructive approach for primary pathology diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8305,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"345-352"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12054848/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2022-0432-OA","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: Digital pathology using whole slide images has been recently approved to support primary diagnosis in clinical surgical pathology practices. Here we describe a novel imaging method, fluorescence-imitating brightfield imaging, that can capture the surface of fresh tissue without requiring prior fixation, paraffin embedding, tissue sectioning, or staining.

Objective.—: To compare the ability of pathologists to evaluate direct-to-digital images with standard pathology preparations.

Design.—: One hundred surgical pathology samples were obtained. Samples were first digitally imaged, then processed for standard histologic examination on 4-μm hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections and digitally scanned. The resulting digital images from both digital and standard scan sets were viewed by each of 4 reading pathologists. The data set consisted of 100 reference diagnoses and 800 study pathologist reads. Each study read was compared to the reference diagnosis, and also compared to that reader's diagnosis across both modalities.

Results.—: The overall agreement rate, across 800 reads, was 97.9%. This consisted of 400 digital reads at 97.0% versus reference and 400 standard reads versus reference at 98.8%. Minor discordances (defined as alternative diagnoses without clinical treatment or outcome implications) were 6.1% overall, 7.2% for digital, and 5.0% for standard.

Conclusions.—: Pathologists can provide accurate diagnoses from fluorescence-imitating brightfield imaging slide-free images. Concordance and discordance rates are similar to published rates for comparisons of whole slide imaging to standard light microscopy of glass slides for primary diagnosis. It may be possible, therefore, to develop a slide-free, nondestructive approach for primary pathology diagnosis.

一项试点验证研究,比较无滑动成像方法--荧光-光场成像与标准的福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋、血红素-伊红染色的组织切片组织学,用于初级手术病理诊断。
背景使用整张切片图像的数字病理学最近已被批准用于支持临床外科病理学实践中的初步诊断。我们在此介绍一种新型成像方法--荧光模拟明视野成像,它可以捕捉新鲜组织的表面,而无需事先固定、石蜡包埋、组织切片或染色:比较病理学家评估直接数字图像与标准病理制备的能力:设计:获取 100 份外科病理样本。首先对样本进行数字成像,然后在 4 微米苏木精-伊红染色的切片上进行标准组织学检查,并进行数字扫描。4 位病理阅片医师分别查看了数字和标准扫描所产生的数字图像。数据集包括 100 个参考诊断和 800 个研究病理学家读片。每个研究读数都与参考诊断进行了比较,同时还与该读数在两种模式下的诊断进行了比较:800个读数的总体一致率为97.9%。其中,400 个数字读数与参考诊断的一致率为 97.0%,400 个标准读数与参考诊断的一致率为 98.8%。轻微不一致(定义为对临床治疗或结果无影响的替代诊断)总体为6.1%,数字为7.2%,标准为5.0%:结论:病理学家可以通过荧光模拟明视野成像无幻灯片图像做出准确诊断。诊断结果的一致率和不一致率与已发表的玻璃载玻片全切片成像与标准光学显微镜初诊比较结果的一致率和不一致率相似。因此,有可能开发出一种无玻片、无损伤的初级病理诊断方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Welcome to the website of the Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (APLM). This monthly, peer-reviewed journal of the College of American Pathologists offers global reach and highest measured readership among pathology journals. Published since 1926, ARCHIVES was voted in 2009 the only pathology journal among the top 100 most influential journals of the past 100 years by the BioMedical and Life Sciences Division of the Special Libraries Association. Online access to the full-text and PDF files of APLM articles is free.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信