Oral contraceptives and cognition: A systematic review

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Caroline Gurvich, Isobel Nicholls, Alex Lavale, Jayashri Kulkarni
{"title":"Oral contraceptives and cognition: A systematic review","authors":"Caroline Gurvich,&nbsp;Isobel Nicholls,&nbsp;Alex Lavale,&nbsp;Jayashri Kulkarni","doi":"10.1016/j.yfrne.2022.101052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Oral contraceptives (OCs) are widely used. While the physical impacts of OCs have been well researched, there is increasing interest on potential impacts of OCs on brain, behaviour and cognition. We systematically reviewed the literature to determine the influence of OCs on cognition, including neurocognition, social cognition and emotional processing. Inclusionary criteria were: (a) premenopausal females taking OCs; (b) a control group of naturally cycling women or OCs users in their inactive (i.e. ‘sugar pill’) phase; and (c) at least one measure of performance on a neurocognitive or social cognitive task. The systematic review found that OC use was associated with some differences in performance on all cognitive domains examined (with the exception of basic auditory attention and psychomotor performance). Several factors were identified that are likely to modulate the way OCs influence cognition, including task related factors, OC type and control group characteristics. Directions for future research are highlighted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12469,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 101052"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091302222000759","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Oral contraceptives (OCs) are widely used. While the physical impacts of OCs have been well researched, there is increasing interest on potential impacts of OCs on brain, behaviour and cognition. We systematically reviewed the literature to determine the influence of OCs on cognition, including neurocognition, social cognition and emotional processing. Inclusionary criteria were: (a) premenopausal females taking OCs; (b) a control group of naturally cycling women or OCs users in their inactive (i.e. ‘sugar pill’) phase; and (c) at least one measure of performance on a neurocognitive or social cognitive task. The systematic review found that OC use was associated with some differences in performance on all cognitive domains examined (with the exception of basic auditory attention and psychomotor performance). Several factors were identified that are likely to modulate the way OCs influence cognition, including task related factors, OC type and control group characteristics. Directions for future research are highlighted.

口服避孕药与认知:系统综述
口服避孕药被广泛使用。虽然强迫症对身体的影响已经得到了很好的研究,但人们对强迫症对大脑、行为和认知的潜在影响越来越感兴趣。我们系统地回顾了文献,以确定强迫症对认知的影响,包括神经认知、社会认知和情绪处理。包容性标准为:(a)绝经前女性服用口服避孕药;(b) 处于非活动(即“糖丸”)阶段的自然循环女性或强迫症患者的对照组;和(c)神经认知或社会认知任务的表现的至少一个度量。系统综述发现,OC的使用与所检查的所有认知领域的表现存在一些差异(基本听觉注意和心理运动表现除外)。已经确定了几个可能调节强迫症影响认知方式的因素,包括任务相关因素、强迫症类型和对照组特征。强调了未来研究的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology
Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
6.80%
发文量
62
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology (FIN) publishes a wide range of informative articles including comprehensive reviews, systematic reviews, opinion pieces, and meta-analyses. While the majority of reviews are invited, we also embrace unsolicited reviews and meta-analyses, as well as proposals for thematic special issues, provided they meet our rigorous quality standards. In addition, we encourage authors to submit commentaries that concisely present fresh ideas or offer further analysis to delve deeper into the implications of an article published in our journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信