Contextual Lateralization Based on Interaural Level Differences Is Preshaped by the Auditory Periphery and Predominantly Immune Against Sequential Segregation.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Bernhard Laback
{"title":"Contextual Lateralization Based on Interaural Level Differences Is Preshaped by the Auditory Periphery and Predominantly Immune Against Sequential Segregation.","authors":"Bernhard Laback","doi":"10.1177/23312165231171988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The perceived azimuth of a target sound is determined by the interaural time difference and the interaural level difference (ILD) and is subject to contextual effects from precursor sounds. This study characterized ILD-based precursor effects (PEs) for high-frequency stimuli in a total of seven normal-hearing listeners. In Experiment 1, precursor and target were band-pass-filtered noises approximately centered at 4 kHz (1.2- and 1-octave bandwidth, respectively) separated by a 10-ms gap. The effects of precursor location (ipsilateral, contralateral, and central) on the perceived target azimuth were measured using a head-pointing task. Relative to control trials without a precursor, ipsilateral precursors biased the perceived target azimuth toward midline (medial bias) and contralateral precursors biased it contralaterally (lateral bias). Central precursors caused a symmetric lateral bias. An auditory periphery model that determines the \"internal\" ILD at the auditory nerve level, including either realistic efferent compression control or auditory nerve adaptation, explained about 50% of the variance in the PEs. These within-trial PEs were accompanied by an across-trial PE, inducing medial bias. Experiment 2 studied the role of sequential segregation in the within-trial PE by introducing a pitch difference between precursor and target. Segregation conditions caused increased PE for ipsilateral, no effect for contralateral, and either no effect or reduced PE for central precursors. Overall, the ILD-based within-trial PE appears to be preshaped already in the auditory periphery and the mechanism underlying at least the ipsilateral PE appears to be immune against sequential segregation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48678,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7e/db/10.1177_23312165231171988.PMC10185981.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23312165231171988","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The perceived azimuth of a target sound is determined by the interaural time difference and the interaural level difference (ILD) and is subject to contextual effects from precursor sounds. This study characterized ILD-based precursor effects (PEs) for high-frequency stimuli in a total of seven normal-hearing listeners. In Experiment 1, precursor and target were band-pass-filtered noises approximately centered at 4 kHz (1.2- and 1-octave bandwidth, respectively) separated by a 10-ms gap. The effects of precursor location (ipsilateral, contralateral, and central) on the perceived target azimuth were measured using a head-pointing task. Relative to control trials without a precursor, ipsilateral precursors biased the perceived target azimuth toward midline (medial bias) and contralateral precursors biased it contralaterally (lateral bias). Central precursors caused a symmetric lateral bias. An auditory periphery model that determines the "internal" ILD at the auditory nerve level, including either realistic efferent compression control or auditory nerve adaptation, explained about 50% of the variance in the PEs. These within-trial PEs were accompanied by an across-trial PE, inducing medial bias. Experiment 2 studied the role of sequential segregation in the within-trial PE by introducing a pitch difference between precursor and target. Segregation conditions caused increased PE for ipsilateral, no effect for contralateral, and either no effect or reduced PE for central precursors. Overall, the ILD-based within-trial PE appears to be preshaped already in the auditory periphery and the mechanism underlying at least the ipsilateral PE appears to be immune against sequential segregation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于耳内水平差异的语境侧向化是由听觉外围预塑的,并且对序列分离具有主要免疫力。
目标声音的感知方位角由耳间时差和耳间电平差(ILD)决定,并受前导声音的上下文影响。本研究对七名听力正常的听者进行了基于 ILD 的高频刺激前兆效应(PEs)研究。在实验 1 中,前导声和目标声都是经过带通滤波的噪音,大约以 4 kHz 为中心(带宽分别为 1.2 倍频程和 1 倍频程),中间间隔 10 毫秒。前体位置(同侧、对侧和中央)对感知目标方位角的影响是通过头部指向任务来测量的。相对于没有前兆的对照试验,同侧前兆使感知到的目标方位角偏向中线(内侧偏向),而对侧前兆使感知到的目标方位角偏向对侧(外侧偏向)。中央前驱体会造成对称的外侧偏向。听觉外围模型决定了听觉神经水平的 "内部 "ILD,包括现实的传出压缩控制或听觉神经适应,该模型解释了约 50% 的 PE 变异。这些试验内PE伴随着跨试验PE,诱发了内侧偏差。实验 2 通过在前导音和目标音之间引入音高差,研究了序列分离在试内 PE 中的作用。在分离条件下,同侧前体的 PE 增加,对侧前体的 PE 没有影响,而对中央前体的 PE 没有影响或减少。总之,基于 ILD 的审限内 PE 似乎已经在听觉外围预先成形,至少同侧 PE 的基本机制似乎对顺序分离具有免疫力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trends in Hearing
Trends in Hearing AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGYOTORH-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Trends in Hearing is an open access journal completely dedicated to publishing original research and reviews focusing on human hearing, hearing loss, hearing aids, auditory implants, and aural rehabilitation. Under its former name, Trends in Amplification, the journal established itself as a forum for concise explorations of all areas of translational hearing research by leaders in the field. Trends in Hearing has now expanded its focus to include original research articles, with the goal of becoming the premier venue for research related to human hearing and hearing loss.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信