Is there a relationship between morphokinetic parameters and neonatal sex in fresh embryo transfers?

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Human Fertility Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-21 DOI:10.1080/14647273.2023.2190043
Avital Wertheimer, Onit Sapir, Assaf Ben Meir, Iris Har-Vardi, Alyssa Hochberg, Avi Ben-Haroush, Roni Garor, Tamar Margalit, Tzippy Schohat, Yoel Shufaro
{"title":"Is there a relationship between morphokinetic parameters and neonatal sex in fresh embryo transfers?","authors":"Avital Wertheimer, Onit Sapir, Assaf Ben Meir, Iris Har-Vardi, Alyssa Hochberg, Avi Ben-Haroush, Roni Garor, Tamar Margalit, Tzippy Schohat, Yoel Shufaro","doi":"10.1080/14647273.2023.2190043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To investigate whether morphokinetic parameters differ between male and female embryos in IVF embryos resulting in live births, a retrospective cohort study was undertaken. Files of all live births resulting from a single embryo transfer (SET) cultured in time-lapse incubators between 2013 and 2019 in two tertiary care centres were reviewed. The study group consisted of 187 SETs resulted in 187 live births, of which 100 were females (53.5%) and 87 were males (46.5%). Embryo selection for transfer was based on the known implantation data (KID) score provided by the Embryoscope and morphological assessment by experienced embryologists. Neonatal sex was confirmed through live birth documentation. Morphokinetic parameters and day 3 and day 5 KID scores of male and female embryos were compared. Maternal baseline and treatment characteristics were similar between groups. Morphokinetic time-lapse parameters of male and female embryos including: pronuclei fading; cleavage timings (t2-t9); second and third cell cycle durations; synchrony of the second and third cleavages; late morphokinetic parameters and KID scores did not differ between groups. In conclusion, time-lapse morphokinetic parameters and embryo selection methods do not seem to differ between male and female embryos, and their utilization does not bias towards any neonatal sex.</p>","PeriodicalId":13006,"journal":{"name":"Human Fertility","volume":" ","pages":"1340-1346"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Fertility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2023.2190043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate whether morphokinetic parameters differ between male and female embryos in IVF embryos resulting in live births, a retrospective cohort study was undertaken. Files of all live births resulting from a single embryo transfer (SET) cultured in time-lapse incubators between 2013 and 2019 in two tertiary care centres were reviewed. The study group consisted of 187 SETs resulted in 187 live births, of which 100 were females (53.5%) and 87 were males (46.5%). Embryo selection for transfer was based on the known implantation data (KID) score provided by the Embryoscope and morphological assessment by experienced embryologists. Neonatal sex was confirmed through live birth documentation. Morphokinetic parameters and day 3 and day 5 KID scores of male and female embryos were compared. Maternal baseline and treatment characteristics were similar between groups. Morphokinetic time-lapse parameters of male and female embryos including: pronuclei fading; cleavage timings (t2-t9); second and third cell cycle durations; synchrony of the second and third cleavages; late morphokinetic parameters and KID scores did not differ between groups. In conclusion, time-lapse morphokinetic parameters and embryo selection methods do not seem to differ between male and female embryos, and their utilization does not bias towards any neonatal sex.

新鲜胚胎移植的形态动力学参数与新生儿性别之间有关系吗?
为了研究在导致活产的试管婴儿胚胎中,男性胚胎和女性胚胎的形态动力学参数是否存在差异,我们开展了一项回顾性队列研究。研究人员查阅了 2013 年至 2019 年期间两个三级医疗中心在延时培养箱中培养的单胚胎移植(SET)所导致的所有活产婴儿的档案。研究小组共进行了187次单次胚胎移植,共培养出187名活产婴儿,其中女性100名(53.5%),男性87名(46.5%)。胚胎移植的选择基于胚胎镜提供的已知植入数据(KID)评分和经验丰富的胚胎学家的形态学评估。新生儿性别通过活产文件确认。对雌雄胚胎的形态动力学参数以及第 3 天和第 5 天的 KID 评分进行了比较。各组母体的基线和治疗特征相似。雌雄胚胎的形态动力延时参数包括:前核消退;分裂时间(t2-t9);第二和第三个细胞周期持续时间;第二和第三个分裂的同步性;晚期形态动力参数和 KID 评分在组间没有差异。总之,延时形态动力学参数和胚胎选择方法在雄性和雌性胚胎之间似乎没有差异,而且它们的使用不会偏向任何新生儿性别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Fertility
Human Fertility OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Human Fertility is a leading international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice in the areas of human fertility and infertility. Topics included span the range from molecular medicine to healthcare delivery, and contributions are welcomed from professionals and academics from the spectrum of disciplines concerned with human fertility. It is published on behalf of the British Fertility Society. The journal also provides a forum for the publication of peer-reviewed articles arising out of the activities of the Association of Biomedical Andrologists, the Association of Clinical Embryologists, the Association of Irish Clinical Embryologists, the British Andrology Society, the British Infertility Counselling Association, the Irish Fertility Society and the Royal College of Nursing Fertility Nurses Group. All submissions are welcome. Articles considered include original papers, reviews, policy statements, commentaries, debates, correspondence, and reports of sessions at meetings. The journal also publishes refereed abstracts from the meetings of the constituent organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信