The utility of word list and story recall for identifying older U.S. Chinese immigrants with cognitive impairment.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-25 DOI:10.1037/neu0000906
Clara Li, Yue Hong, Kun Wang, Judith Neugroschl, Carolyn W Zhu, Xiaoyi Zeng, Xiao Yang, Amy Aloysi, Hillel Grossman, Dongming Cai, Jessica Spat-Lemus, Jane Martin, Margaret Sewell, Mary Sano
{"title":"The utility of word list and story recall for identifying older U.S. Chinese immigrants with cognitive impairment.","authors":"Clara Li, Yue Hong, Kun Wang, Judith Neugroschl, Carolyn W Zhu, Xiaoyi Zeng, Xiao Yang, Amy Aloysi, Hillel Grossman, Dongming Cai, Jessica Spat-Lemus, Jane Martin, Margaret Sewell, Mary Sano","doi":"10.1037/neu0000906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the utility of the Chinese-language translations of the word list memory test (Philadelphia Verbal Learning Test) and story memory test (Logical Memory subtest of the Wechsler Memory Scale) for differentiating cognitive diagnosis in older U.S. Chinese immigrants.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were ≥ 60 years old, with Chinese language proficiency to complete a diagnostic workup at the Mount Sinai's Alzheimer's Disease Research Center. The workup included an evaluation by a geriatric psychiatrist and cognitive testing with a psychometrician. Diagnosis of normal, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia was made independent of the cognitive tests at consensus led by a dementia expert physician. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the sensitivity of story and word list memory tests for distinguishing between groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC area/area under the curve [AUC]) was used to compare the predictive accuracy of the two tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 71 participants with normal cognition, 42 with MCI, and 24 with dementia. The MCI group was older and less educated than normal controls but younger and more educated than the dementia group. Delayed recall of both memory tests, but not immediate recall of either test, predicted diagnosis. While composite memory score of word list (AUC = 0.90) predicted diagnosis slightly better than that of stories (AUC = 0.85), the difference was not significant in this small sample (<i>p</i> = .14).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Chinese-language translations of verbal memory tests, in particular delayed recall scores, were equally sensitive for classifying cognitive diagnosis in older U.S. Chinese immigrants. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":19205,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615662/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000906","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the utility of the Chinese-language translations of the word list memory test (Philadelphia Verbal Learning Test) and story memory test (Logical Memory subtest of the Wechsler Memory Scale) for differentiating cognitive diagnosis in older U.S. Chinese immigrants.

Method: Participants were ≥ 60 years old, with Chinese language proficiency to complete a diagnostic workup at the Mount Sinai's Alzheimer's Disease Research Center. The workup included an evaluation by a geriatric psychiatrist and cognitive testing with a psychometrician. Diagnosis of normal, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia was made independent of the cognitive tests at consensus led by a dementia expert physician. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the sensitivity of story and word list memory tests for distinguishing between groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC area/area under the curve [AUC]) was used to compare the predictive accuracy of the two tests.

Results: The sample included 71 participants with normal cognition, 42 with MCI, and 24 with dementia. The MCI group was older and less educated than normal controls but younger and more educated than the dementia group. Delayed recall of both memory tests, but not immediate recall of either test, predicted diagnosis. While composite memory score of word list (AUC = 0.90) predicted diagnosis slightly better than that of stories (AUC = 0.85), the difference was not significant in this small sample (p = .14).

Conclusions: Chinese-language translations of verbal memory tests, in particular delayed recall scores, were equally sensitive for classifying cognitive diagnosis in older U.S. Chinese immigrants. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

单词列表和故事回忆在识别有认知障碍的美国华裔老年移民中的效用。
目的:本研究考察了单词列表记忆测试(Philadelphia Verbal Learning test)和故事记忆测试(Wechsler记忆量表的逻辑记忆子测验)的中文翻译在区分美国华裔老年移民认知诊断中的效用。方法:参与者年龄≥60岁,汉语熟练,在西奈山阿尔茨海默病研究中心完成诊断检查。这项检查包括一名老年精神病学家的评估和一名心理测量师的认知测试。在痴呆症专家医师的一致领导下,正常、轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆症的诊断独立于认知测试。多变量逻辑回归模型用于评估故事和单词表记忆测试在区分组间的敏感性。受试者操作特征(ROC面积/曲线下面积[AUC])用于比较两种测试的预测准确性。结果:样本包括71名认知正常的参与者、42名MCI参与者和24名痴呆症参与者。MCI组比正常对照组年龄更大,受教育程度更低,但比痴呆组更年轻,受教育水平更高。两项记忆测试的延迟回忆,但不是任何一项测试的立即回忆,可以预测诊断。虽然单词表的综合记忆得分(AUC=0.90)比故事的综合记忆分数(AUC=8.85)对诊断的预测略好,但在这个小样本中差异并不显著(p=.14)。结论:言语记忆测试的中文翻译,特别是延迟回忆得分,对美国华裔老年移民的认知诊断分类同样敏感。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychology
Neuropsychology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychology publishes original, empirical research; systematic reviews and meta-analyses; and theoretical articles on the relation between brain and human cognitive, emotional, and behavioral function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信