A Randomized Control Trial Testing a Medication Safety Dashboard in Veteran Transplant Recipients.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
David J Taber, Sherry Milfred-LaForest, Kelsey Rife, Rebecca Felkner, Danielle Cooney, Nicholas Super, Samantha McClelland, Casey Buchanan
{"title":"A Randomized Control Trial Testing a Medication Safety Dashboard in Veteran Transplant Recipients.","authors":"David J Taber,&nbsp;Sherry Milfred-LaForest,&nbsp;Kelsey Rife,&nbsp;Rebecca Felkner,&nbsp;Danielle Cooney,&nbsp;Nicholas Super,&nbsp;Samantha McClelland,&nbsp;Casey Buchanan","doi":"10.1177/15269248231164177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medication errors, adverse events, and nonadherence in organ transplant recipients are common and can lead to suboptimal outcomes. A medication safety dashboard was developed to identify issues in medication therapy.</p><p><strong>Research questions: </strong>Can a multicenter bioinformatics dashboard accurately identify clinically relevant medication safety issues in US military Veteran transplant recipients?</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The dashboard was tested through a 24-month, prospective, cluster-randomized controlled multicenter study. Pharmacists used the dashboard to identify and address potential medication safety issues, which was compared with usual care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the 10 sites (5 control sites and 5 intervention sites), 2012 patients were enrolled (1197 intervention vs 831 control). The mean age was 65 (10) years, 95% male, and 27% Black. The dashboard produced 18 132 alerts at a rate of 0.61(0.32) alerts per patient-month, ranging from 0.44 to 0.72 across the 5 intervention sites. Lab-based issues were most common (83.4%), followed by nonadherence (9.4%) and transitions in care (6.4%); 56% of alerts were addressed, taking an average of 43 (29) days. Common responses to alerts included those already resolved by another provider (N = 4431, 44%), the alert not clinically relevant (N = 3131, 31%), scheduling of follow-up labs (N = 591, 6%), and providing medication reconciliation/education (N = 99, 1%). Inaccurate flags significantly decreased over the study by a mean of -0.6% per month (95% CI -0.1 to -1.0; <i>P</i> = .0265), starting at 13.4% and ending at 2.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This multicenter cluster-randomized controlled trial demonstrated that a medication safety dashboard was feasibly deployable across the VA healthcare system, creating valid alerts.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":"33 2","pages":"121-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248231164177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Medication errors, adverse events, and nonadherence in organ transplant recipients are common and can lead to suboptimal outcomes. A medication safety dashboard was developed to identify issues in medication therapy.

Research questions: Can a multicenter bioinformatics dashboard accurately identify clinically relevant medication safety issues in US military Veteran transplant recipients?

Design: The dashboard was tested through a 24-month, prospective, cluster-randomized controlled multicenter study. Pharmacists used the dashboard to identify and address potential medication safety issues, which was compared with usual care.

Results: Across the 10 sites (5 control sites and 5 intervention sites), 2012 patients were enrolled (1197 intervention vs 831 control). The mean age was 65 (10) years, 95% male, and 27% Black. The dashboard produced 18 132 alerts at a rate of 0.61(0.32) alerts per patient-month, ranging from 0.44 to 0.72 across the 5 intervention sites. Lab-based issues were most common (83.4%), followed by nonadherence (9.4%) and transitions in care (6.4%); 56% of alerts were addressed, taking an average of 43 (29) days. Common responses to alerts included those already resolved by another provider (N = 4431, 44%), the alert not clinically relevant (N = 3131, 31%), scheduling of follow-up labs (N = 591, 6%), and providing medication reconciliation/education (N = 99, 1%). Inaccurate flags significantly decreased over the study by a mean of -0.6% per month (95% CI -0.1 to -1.0; P = .0265), starting at 13.4% and ending at 2.6%.

Conclusion: This multicenter cluster-randomized controlled trial demonstrated that a medication safety dashboard was feasibly deployable across the VA healthcare system, creating valid alerts.

退伍军人移植受者用药安全仪表盘的随机对照试验。
在器官移植受者中,药物错误、不良事件和不依从是常见的,并可能导致次优结果。开发了一个药物安全仪表板来识别药物治疗中的问题。研究问题:多中心生物信息学仪表板能否准确识别美国退伍军人移植受者的临床相关药物安全问题?设计:仪表板通过一项为期24个月的前瞻性、集群随机对照多中心研究进行测试。药剂师使用仪表板来识别和解决潜在的药物安全问题,并将其与常规护理进行比较。结果:在10个试验点(5个对照试验点和5个干预试验点)中,共纳入2012例患者(干预1197例,对照组831例)。平均年龄65(10)岁,95%为男性,27%为黑人。仪表板以每个患者每月0.61(0.32)个警报的速率产生18132个警报,在5个干预点的范围从0.44到0.72。以实验室为基础的问题最常见(83.4%),其次是不依从(9.4%)和转院(6.4%);56%的警报得到了处理,平均耗时43(29)天。对警报的常见回应包括已由其他提供者解决的警报(N = 4431, 44%),与临床无关的警报(N = 3131, 31%),安排随访实验室(N = 591,6%),以及提供药物和解/教育(N = 99,1%)。在研究期间,不准确的标志显著减少,平均每月-0.6% (95% CI -0.1至-1.0;P = 0.0265),开始为13.4%,结束为2.6%。结论:这项多中心集群随机对照试验表明,在VA医疗保健系统中部署药物安全仪表板是可行的,可以创建有效的警报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Progress in Transplantation
Progress in Transplantation SURGERY-TRANSPLANTATION
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Transplantation (PIT) is the official journal of NATCO, The Organization for Transplant Professionals. Journal Partners include: Australasian Transplant Coordinators Association and Society for Transplant Social Workers. PIT reflects the multi-disciplinary team approach to procurement and clinical aspects of organ and tissue transplantation by providing a professional forum for exchange of the continually changing body of knowledge in transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信