Apple puree as a natural fructose source provides an effective alternative carbohydrate source for fuelling half-marathon running performance.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-23 DOI:10.1080/17461391.2023.2207074
Kirsty M Reynolds, Loris A Juett, Mark P Funnell, Joshua B Schofield, Claire Grundig, George Melidis, Alexander Brown, Will Hubbard, Yuxuan Luo, Ibrahim Almahaireh, J Lewis James, Stephen A Mears
{"title":"Apple puree as a natural fructose source provides an effective alternative carbohydrate source for fuelling half-marathon running performance.","authors":"Kirsty M Reynolds,&nbsp;Loris A Juett,&nbsp;Mark P Funnell,&nbsp;Joshua B Schofield,&nbsp;Claire Grundig,&nbsp;George Melidis,&nbsp;Alexander Brown,&nbsp;Will Hubbard,&nbsp;Yuxuan Luo,&nbsp;Ibrahim Almahaireh,&nbsp;J Lewis James,&nbsp;Stephen A Mears","doi":"10.1080/17461391.2023.2207074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Carbohydrate supplementation during endurance exercise is known to improve performance, but the effects of food-based approaches in running exercise are understudied. Therefore, this study investigated the performance and gastrointestinal (GI) effects of a carbohydrate supplement containing a natural fructose source compared with a highly processed fructose source in a combined glucose-fructose supplement, during a half-marathon. Eleven trained runners (9 males, 2 females; age 32 ± 8 y, 89:53 ± 13:28 min half-marathon personal record) completed a familiarisation (8 miles) and two experimental trials (13.1 miles) on an outdoor running course, with blood and urine samples collected before and after the run. Subjective GI measures were made throughout the run. Carbohydrate was provided as a natural fructose source in the form of apple puree (AP) or highly processed crystalline fructose (GF) in a 2:1 glucose-to-fructose ratio (additional required glucose was provided through maltodextrin). Half-marathon performance was not different between carbohydrate sources (AP 89:52 ± 09:33 min, GF 88:44 ± 10:09 min; <i>P = </i>0.684). There were no interaction effects for GI comfort (<i>P </i>= 0.305) or other GI symptoms (<i>P </i>≥ 0.211). There were no differences between carbohydrate sources in <i>ad libitum</i> fluid intake (AP 409 ± 206 mL; GF 294 ± 149 mL; <i>P </i>= 0.094) or any other urinary (<i>P </i>≥ 0.724), blood-based (<i>P </i>≥ 0.215) or subjective (<i>P </i>≥ 0.421) measures. Apple puree as a natural fructose source was equivalent to crystalline fructose in supporting half-marathon running performance without increasing GI symptoms.<b>Highlights</b>Research examining food-first and food-based approaches to carbohydrate supplementation and endurance running performance are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to compare carbohydrate supplements either containing a natural or highly processed fructose source as part of a glucose-fructose supplement on half-marathon running performance and gastrointestinal comfort in trained runners.Running performance (apple puree 89:52 ± 09:33 min vs. crystalline fructose 88:44 ± 10:09 min), gastrointestinal comfort and symptoms were not different between the two fructose sources.Apple puree can be effectively used as a carbohydrate source to fuel half-marathon running performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2023.2207074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carbohydrate supplementation during endurance exercise is known to improve performance, but the effects of food-based approaches in running exercise are understudied. Therefore, this study investigated the performance and gastrointestinal (GI) effects of a carbohydrate supplement containing a natural fructose source compared with a highly processed fructose source in a combined glucose-fructose supplement, during a half-marathon. Eleven trained runners (9 males, 2 females; age 32 ± 8 y, 89:53 ± 13:28 min half-marathon personal record) completed a familiarisation (8 miles) and two experimental trials (13.1 miles) on an outdoor running course, with blood and urine samples collected before and after the run. Subjective GI measures were made throughout the run. Carbohydrate was provided as a natural fructose source in the form of apple puree (AP) or highly processed crystalline fructose (GF) in a 2:1 glucose-to-fructose ratio (additional required glucose was provided through maltodextrin). Half-marathon performance was not different between carbohydrate sources (AP 89:52 ± 09:33 min, GF 88:44 ± 10:09 min; P = 0.684). There were no interaction effects for GI comfort (P = 0.305) or other GI symptoms (P ≥ 0.211). There were no differences between carbohydrate sources in ad libitum fluid intake (AP 409 ± 206 mL; GF 294 ± 149 mL; P = 0.094) or any other urinary (P ≥ 0.724), blood-based (P ≥ 0.215) or subjective (P ≥ 0.421) measures. Apple puree as a natural fructose source was equivalent to crystalline fructose in supporting half-marathon running performance without increasing GI symptoms.HighlightsResearch examining food-first and food-based approaches to carbohydrate supplementation and endurance running performance are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to compare carbohydrate supplements either containing a natural or highly processed fructose source as part of a glucose-fructose supplement on half-marathon running performance and gastrointestinal comfort in trained runners.Running performance (apple puree 89:52 ± 09:33 min vs. crystalline fructose 88:44 ± 10:09 min), gastrointestinal comfort and symptoms were not different between the two fructose sources.Apple puree can be effectively used as a carbohydrate source to fuel half-marathon running performance.

苹果泥作为一种天然果糖来源,为半程马拉松比赛提供了一种有效的替代碳水化合物来源。
众所周知,在耐力运动中补充碳水化合物可以提高成绩,但跑步运动中基于食物的方法的效果研究不足。因此,本研究调查了在半程马拉松比赛中,与葡萄糖-果糖联合补充剂中的高度加工果糖来源相比,含有天然果糖来源的碳水化合物补充剂的性能和胃肠道(GI)影响。11名受过训练的跑步者(9名男性,2名女性;年龄32岁 ± 8年,89:53 ± 13:28分钟半程马拉松个人记录)在户外跑步课程上完成了一次熟悉(8英里)和两次实验性试验(13.1英里),在跑步前后采集了血液和尿液样本。在整个跑步过程中进行了主观GI测量。碳水化合物是以苹果泥(AP)或高度加工的结晶果糖(GF)的形式提供的天然果糖源,葡萄糖与果糖的比例为2:1(通过麦芽糊精提供额外的所需葡萄糖)。碳水化合物来源之间的半程马拉松成绩没有差异(美联社89:52 ± 09:33 最小,GF 88:44 ± 10:09 min;P = 0.684)。胃肠道舒适度无交互作用(P = 0.305)或其他胃肠道症状(P ≥ 0.211)。随意摄入液体的碳水化合物来源之间没有差异(AP 409 ± 206 mL;GF 294 ± 149 mL;P = 0.094)或任何其他尿液(P ≥ 0.724),以血液为基础(P ≥ 0.215)或主观(P ≥ 0.421)措施。苹果泥作为一种天然果糖来源,在不增加胃肠道症状的情况下支持半程马拉松跑步表现,相当于结晶果糖。重点研究以食物为主和以食物为基础的碳水化合物补充和耐力跑表现的方法是有限的。因此,本研究旨在比较含有天然或高度加工果糖来源的碳水化合物补充剂作为葡萄糖果糖补充剂的一部分,对半程马拉松跑步成绩和受过训练的跑步者的胃肠道舒适度的影响。跑步表现(苹果泥89:52 ± 09:33 最小值与结晶果糖88:44 ± 10:09 min)、胃肠道舒适度和症状在两种果糖来源之间没有差异。苹果泥可以有效地用作碳水化合物来源,为半程马拉松比赛提供能量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信