A Comparative Evaluation of Topical Application Versus Perilesional Injection of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Diabetic Foot Ulcer.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Digumarthi Asha Rani, Seema Khanna, S P Mishra, Sandip Kumar
{"title":"A Comparative Evaluation of Topical Application Versus Perilesional Injection of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Diabetic Foot Ulcer.","authors":"Digumarthi Asha Rani, Seema Khanna, S P Mishra, Sandip Kumar","doi":"10.1177/15347346231176727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is globally a major health burden predisposing to limb amputation. Among the various treatment modalities, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is emerging as a promising agent. It stimulates wound healing by providing a higher concentration of essential growth factors locally. Though the role of PRP in DFU healing is established, still the route of administration with maximal efficacy is yet to be defined. Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy of autologous PRP in the treatment of diabetic ulcers and compare the effect of topical and perilesional injections of PRP in DFU healing. We conducted a single-centre, prospective, interventional study on 60 patients with DFU, in 2 groups of 30 patients each. They were treated with freshly prepared autologous PRP injection perilesionally and topically respectively, once a week for 4 weeks. Ulcer size was assessed, using \"imito-measure\" software at presentation and 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-therapy. Serum MMP-9 levels were assessed in both groups, pretreatment and post-treatment. For statistical analysis, SPSS software V-23 was used. On assessment, both groups had comparable baseline characteristics, Wagner's grading, and glycemic indices. The percentage reduction in the size of the wound at 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months was greater in the perilesional group as compared to the topical PRP group.</p>","PeriodicalId":49181,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds","volume":" ","pages":"1188-1197"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346231176727","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is globally a major health burden predisposing to limb amputation. Among the various treatment modalities, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is emerging as a promising agent. It stimulates wound healing by providing a higher concentration of essential growth factors locally. Though the role of PRP in DFU healing is established, still the route of administration with maximal efficacy is yet to be defined. Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy of autologous PRP in the treatment of diabetic ulcers and compare the effect of topical and perilesional injections of PRP in DFU healing. We conducted a single-centre, prospective, interventional study on 60 patients with DFU, in 2 groups of 30 patients each. They were treated with freshly prepared autologous PRP injection perilesionally and topically respectively, once a week for 4 weeks. Ulcer size was assessed, using "imito-measure" software at presentation and 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-therapy. Serum MMP-9 levels were assessed in both groups, pretreatment and post-treatment. For statistical analysis, SPSS software V-23 was used. On assessment, both groups had comparable baseline characteristics, Wagner's grading, and glycemic indices. The percentage reduction in the size of the wound at 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months was greater in the perilesional group as compared to the topical PRP group.

局部应用与病灶周围注射富血小板血浆治疗糖尿病足溃疡的比较评价。
糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)是全球范围内导致截肢的主要健康负担。在各种治疗方式中,富血小板血浆(PRP)正在成为一种有前景的药物。它通过在局部提供更高浓度的必需生长因子来刺激伤口愈合。虽然PRP在DFU愈合中的作用已经确立,但最大疗效的给药途径尚未明确。我们的研究旨在评估自体PRP治疗糖尿病溃疡的疗效,并比较局部和病灶周围注射PRP对DFU愈合的影响。我们对60例DFU患者进行了一项单中心、前瞻性、介入性研究,分为两组,每组30例。分别给予新鲜制备的自体PRP注射周外和局部治疗,每周1次,连用4周。采用“极限测量”软件评估溃疡大小,分别在首发时和治疗后2、4、8和12周。检测两组患者治疗前后血清MMP-9水平。采用SPSS V-23软件进行统计分析。在评估时,两组具有可比的基线特征、Wagner分级和血糖指数。与局部PRP组相比,病灶周围组在2周、1个月、2个月和3个月时伤口大小减少的百分比更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
95
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds (IJLEW) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, reviews of evidence-based diagnostic techniques and methods, disease and patient management, and surgical and medical therapeutics for lower extremity wounds such as burns, stomas, ulcers, fistulas, and traumatic wounds. IJLEW also offers evaluations of assessment and monitoring tools, dressings, gels, cleansers, pressure management, footwear/orthotics, casting, and bioengineered skin. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书