Optimization of collateral grading on computer tomography angiography.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Interventional Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-24 DOI:10.1177/15910199231176310
Leonardo Pisani, Diogo C Haussen, Mahmoud Mohammaden, Catarina Perry da Camara, Gabriel M Rodrigues, Mehdi Bouslama, Alhamza Al-Bayati, Ranliang Hu, Nicholas Bianchi, Nirav Ravindra Bhatt, Michael Frankel, Raul G Nogueira
{"title":"Optimization of collateral grading on computer tomography angiography.","authors":"Leonardo Pisani, Diogo C Haussen, Mahmoud Mohammaden, Catarina Perry da Camara, Gabriel M Rodrigues, Mehdi Bouslama, Alhamza Al-Bayati, Ranliang Hu, Nicholas Bianchi, Nirav Ravindra Bhatt, Michael Frankel, Raul G Nogueira","doi":"10.1177/15910199231176310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAs compared to single-phase CTA (sCTA), multi-phase CTA (mCTA) has been shown to more accurately estimate collateral flow in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We sought to determine the characterization of poor collaterals across the three different phases of the mCTA. We also attempted to establish the optimal arterio-venous contrast timing parameters on sCTA that would prevent false positive reads of poor collateral status.MethodsWe retrospectively screened consecutive patients admitted for possible thrombectomy from February 2018 to June 2019. Only cases with intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) or main trunk of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion and both baseline mCTA and CT Perfusion available were included. Mean Hounsfield units (HU) of torcula and torcula/patent ICA ratio were used for the arterio-venous timing analysis.ResultsOf the 105 patients included, 35 (34%) received IV-tPA treatment and 65 (61.9%) underwent mechanical thrombectomy. A total of 20 patients (19%) had poor collaterals on the third-phase CTA (ground-truth). The first-phase CTA often underestimated collateral score (37/105 [35%], p < 0.01), however there were no significant differences across the second- and third-phases (5/105[5%], p  =  0.06. Venous opacification Youden's J point for identifying suboptimal sCTAs was found to be 207.9HU in the torcula (65% sensitivity,65% specificity) and 66.74% for torcula/patent ICA ratio (51% sensitivity,73% specificity).ConclusionA dual-phase CTA is significantly similar to a mCTA assessment of collateral score and may be applied at community-based centers. Absolute or relative thresholds for torcula opacification may be used to identify poor bolus-scan timing thus preventing erroneous assumptions of poor collaterals on sCTA.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"502-509"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12280266/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199231176310","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundAs compared to single-phase CTA (sCTA), multi-phase CTA (mCTA) has been shown to more accurately estimate collateral flow in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We sought to determine the characterization of poor collaterals across the three different phases of the mCTA. We also attempted to establish the optimal arterio-venous contrast timing parameters on sCTA that would prevent false positive reads of poor collateral status.MethodsWe retrospectively screened consecutive patients admitted for possible thrombectomy from February 2018 to June 2019. Only cases with intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) or main trunk of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion and both baseline mCTA and CT Perfusion available were included. Mean Hounsfield units (HU) of torcula and torcula/patent ICA ratio were used for the arterio-venous timing analysis.ResultsOf the 105 patients included, 35 (34%) received IV-tPA treatment and 65 (61.9%) underwent mechanical thrombectomy. A total of 20 patients (19%) had poor collaterals on the third-phase CTA (ground-truth). The first-phase CTA often underestimated collateral score (37/105 [35%], p < 0.01), however there were no significant differences across the second- and third-phases (5/105[5%], p  =  0.06. Venous opacification Youden's J point for identifying suboptimal sCTAs was found to be 207.9HU in the torcula (65% sensitivity,65% specificity) and 66.74% for torcula/patent ICA ratio (51% sensitivity,73% specificity).ConclusionA dual-phase CTA is significantly similar to a mCTA assessment of collateral score and may be applied at community-based centers. Absolute or relative thresholds for torcula opacification may be used to identify poor bolus-scan timing thus preventing erroneous assumptions of poor collaterals on sCTA.

计算机断层血管造影侧支分级的优化。
与单相CTA (sCTA)相比,多期CTA (mCTA)已被证明能更准确地估计急性缺血性卒中(AIS)的侧支血流。我们试图确定在mCTA的三个不同阶段的不良抵押品的特征。我们还试图在sCTA上建立最佳动静脉对比时间参数,以防止不良侧枝状态的假阳性读数。方法回顾性筛选2018年2月至2019年6月收治的可能取栓的连续患者。仅包括颅内颈内动脉(ICA)或大脑中动脉主干(MCA)闭塞且基线mCTA和CT灌注均可用的病例。采用环的平均Hounsfield单位(HU)和环/专利ICA比值进行动静脉时间分析。结果105例患者中,35例(34%)接受IV-tPA治疗,65例(61.9%)接受机械取栓。共有20名患者(19%)在第三期CTA(基础事实)中有不良的侧索。第一阶段CTA往往低估了侧支评分(37/105 [35%],p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信