Differential Tracking of Linguistic vs. Mental State Content in Naturalistic Stimuli by Language and Theory of Mind (ToM) Brain Networks.

IF 3.6 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Neurobiology of Language Pub Date : 2022-07-14 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1162/nol_a_00071
Alexander M Paunov, Idan A Blank, Olessia Jouravlev, Zachary Mineroff, Jeanne Gallée, Evelina Fedorenko
{"title":"Differential Tracking of Linguistic vs. Mental State Content in Naturalistic Stimuli by Language and Theory of Mind (ToM) Brain Networks.","authors":"Alexander M Paunov, Idan A Blank, Olessia Jouravlev, Zachary Mineroff, Jeanne Gallée, Evelina Fedorenko","doi":"10.1162/nol_a_00071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Language and social cognition, especially the ability to reason about mental states, known as <i>theory of mind</i> (ToM), are deeply related in development and everyday use. However, whether these cognitive faculties rely on distinct, overlapping, or the same mechanisms remains debated. Some evidence suggests that, by adulthood, language and ToM draw on largely distinct-though plausibly interacting-cortical networks. However, the broad topography of these networks is similar, and some have emphasized the importance of social content / communicative intent in the linguistic signal for eliciting responses in the language areas. Here, we combine the power of individual-subject functional localization with the naturalistic-cognition inter-subject correlation approach to illuminate the language-ToM relationship. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we recorded neural activity as participants (<i>n</i> = 43) listened to stories and dialogues with mental state content (+linguistic, +ToM), viewed silent animations and live action films with mental state content but no language (-linguistic, +ToM), or listened to an expository text (+linguistic, -ToM). The ToM network robustly tracked stimuli rich in mental state information regardless of whether mental states were conveyed linguistically or non-linguistically, while tracking a +linguistic / -ToM stimulus only weakly. In contrast, the language network tracked linguistic stimuli more strongly than (a) non-linguistic stimuli, and than (b) the ToM network, and showed reliable tracking even for the linguistic condition devoid of mental state content. These findings suggest that in spite of their indisputably close links, language and ToM dissociate robustly in their neural substrates-and thus plausibly cognitive mechanisms-including during the processing of rich naturalistic materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":34845,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Language","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Language and social cognition, especially the ability to reason about mental states, known as theory of mind (ToM), are deeply related in development and everyday use. However, whether these cognitive faculties rely on distinct, overlapping, or the same mechanisms remains debated. Some evidence suggests that, by adulthood, language and ToM draw on largely distinct-though plausibly interacting-cortical networks. However, the broad topography of these networks is similar, and some have emphasized the importance of social content / communicative intent in the linguistic signal for eliciting responses in the language areas. Here, we combine the power of individual-subject functional localization with the naturalistic-cognition inter-subject correlation approach to illuminate the language-ToM relationship. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we recorded neural activity as participants (n = 43) listened to stories and dialogues with mental state content (+linguistic, +ToM), viewed silent animations and live action films with mental state content but no language (-linguistic, +ToM), or listened to an expository text (+linguistic, -ToM). The ToM network robustly tracked stimuli rich in mental state information regardless of whether mental states were conveyed linguistically or non-linguistically, while tracking a +linguistic / -ToM stimulus only weakly. In contrast, the language network tracked linguistic stimuli more strongly than (a) non-linguistic stimuli, and than (b) the ToM network, and showed reliable tracking even for the linguistic condition devoid of mental state content. These findings suggest that in spite of their indisputably close links, language and ToM dissociate robustly in their neural substrates-and thus plausibly cognitive mechanisms-including during the processing of rich naturalistic materials.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

语言和心智理论(ToM)脑网络对自然刺激中语言内容和心理状态内容的不同追踪。
语言和社会认知,尤其是对心理状态进行推理的能力,即所谓的心智理论(ToM),在发展和日常使用中有着深刻的联系。然而,这些认知能力是依赖于不同的、重叠的还是相同的机制,目前仍存在争议。一些证据表明,到了成年期,语言和心智理论在很大程度上依赖于不同的皮层网络,尽管它们之间可能存在相互作用。然而,这些网络的广泛拓扑结构是相似的,有些人强调了语言信号中的社会内容/交际意图对引起语言区反应的重要性。在这里,我们将个体-受试者功能定位的力量与自然认知的受试者间相关性方法结合起来,以阐明语言与ToM的关系。利用功能磁共振成像(fMRI),我们记录了参与者(n = 43)在聆听有心理状态内容的故事和对话(+语言,+ToM)、观看有心理状态内容但无语言的无声动画和真人电影(-语言,+ToM)或聆听说明性文本(+语言,-ToM)时的神经活动。无论心理状态是以语言或非语言的方式传达,ToM 网络都能强有力地追踪富含心理状态信息的刺激,而对 + 语言/-ToM 刺激的追踪则很弱。相比之下,语言网络对语言刺激的追踪比(a)非语言刺激和(b)ToM 网络更强,甚至对没有心理状态内容的语言条件也表现出可靠的追踪。这些研究结果表明,尽管语言和ToM之间有着无可争议的密切联系,但它们在神经基质上--从而在认知机制上--包括在处理丰富的自然材料时--存在着强有力的分离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurobiology of Language
Neurobiology of Language Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
32
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信