Validation of cross-sectional and longitudinal ComBat harmonization methods for magnetic resonance imaging data on a travelling subject cohort

Q4 Neuroscience
Sophie Richter , Stefan Winzeck , Marta M. Correia , Evgenios N. Kornaropoulos , Anne Manktelow , Joanne Outtrim , Doris Chatfield , Jussi P. Posti , Olli Tenovuo , Guy B. Williams , David K. Menon , Virginia F.J. Newcombe
{"title":"Validation of cross-sectional and longitudinal ComBat harmonization methods for magnetic resonance imaging data on a travelling subject cohort","authors":"Sophie Richter ,&nbsp;Stefan Winzeck ,&nbsp;Marta M. Correia ,&nbsp;Evgenios N. Kornaropoulos ,&nbsp;Anne Manktelow ,&nbsp;Joanne Outtrim ,&nbsp;Doris Chatfield ,&nbsp;Jussi P. Posti ,&nbsp;Olli Tenovuo ,&nbsp;Guy B. Williams ,&nbsp;David K. Menon ,&nbsp;Virginia F.J. Newcombe","doi":"10.1016/j.ynirp.2022.100136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The growth in multi-center neuroimaging studies generated a need for methods that mitigate the differences in hardware and acquisition protocols across sites i.e., scanner effects. ComBat harmonization methods have shown promise but have not yet been tested on all the data types commonly studied with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This study aimed to validate neuroCombat, longCombat and gamCombat on both structural and diffusion metrics in both cross-sectional and longitudinal data.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used a travelling subject design whereby 73 healthy volunteers contributed 161 scans across two sites and four machines using one T1 and five diffusion MRI protocols. Scanner was defined as a composite of site, machine and protocol. A common pipeline extracted two structural metrics (volumes and cortical thickness) and two diffusion tensor imaging metrics (mean diffusivity and fractional anisotropy) for seven regions of interest including gray and (except for cortical thickness) white matter regions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Structural data exhibited no significant scanner effect and therefore did not benefit from harmonization in our particular cohort. Indeed, attempting harmonization obscured the true biological effect for some regions of interest. Diffusion data contained marked scanner effects and was successfully harmonized by all methods, resulting in smaller scanner effects and better detection of true biological effects. LongCombat less effectively reduced the scanner effect for cross-sectional white matter data but had a slightly lower probability of incorrectly finding group differences in simulations, compared to neuroCombat and gamCombat. False positive rates for all methods and all metrics did not significantly exceed 5%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Statistical harmonization of structural data is not always necessary and harmonization in the absence of a scanner effect may be harmful. Harmonization of diffusion MRI data is highly recommended with neuroCombat, longCombat and gamCombat performing well in cross-sectional and longitudinal settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74277,"journal":{"name":"Neuroimage. Reports","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726680/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroimage. Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666956022000605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background

The growth in multi-center neuroimaging studies generated a need for methods that mitigate the differences in hardware and acquisition protocols across sites i.e., scanner effects. ComBat harmonization methods have shown promise but have not yet been tested on all the data types commonly studied with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This study aimed to validate neuroCombat, longCombat and gamCombat on both structural and diffusion metrics in both cross-sectional and longitudinal data.

Methods

We used a travelling subject design whereby 73 healthy volunteers contributed 161 scans across two sites and four machines using one T1 and five diffusion MRI protocols. Scanner was defined as a composite of site, machine and protocol. A common pipeline extracted two structural metrics (volumes and cortical thickness) and two diffusion tensor imaging metrics (mean diffusivity and fractional anisotropy) for seven regions of interest including gray and (except for cortical thickness) white matter regions.

Results

Structural data exhibited no significant scanner effect and therefore did not benefit from harmonization in our particular cohort. Indeed, attempting harmonization obscured the true biological effect for some regions of interest. Diffusion data contained marked scanner effects and was successfully harmonized by all methods, resulting in smaller scanner effects and better detection of true biological effects. LongCombat less effectively reduced the scanner effect for cross-sectional white matter data but had a slightly lower probability of incorrectly finding group differences in simulations, compared to neuroCombat and gamCombat. False positive rates for all methods and all metrics did not significantly exceed 5%.

Conclusions

Statistical harmonization of structural data is not always necessary and harmonization in the absence of a scanner effect may be harmful. Harmonization of diffusion MRI data is highly recommended with neuroCombat, longCombat and gamCombat performing well in cross-sectional and longitudinal settings.

Abstract Image

在旅行受试者队列上磁共振成像数据的横截面和纵向战斗协调方法的验证
背景多中心神经成像研究的增长产生了对减轻硬件和采集协议差异的方法的需求,即扫描仪效应。战斗协调方法已显示出希望,但尚未在核磁共振成像(MRI)通常研究的所有数据类型上进行测试。本研究旨在通过横断面和纵向数据验证neuroCombat、longCombat和gamCombat的结构和扩散指标。方法采用旅行受试者设计,其中73名健康志愿者在2个地点和4台机器上使用1种T1和5种弥散MRI协议进行161次扫描。扫描器被定义为站点、机器和协议的综合体。一个通用的管道提取了七个感兴趣的区域的两个结构指标(体积和皮质厚度)和两个扩散张量成像指标(平均扩散率和分数各向异性),包括灰质和白质区域(皮质厚度除外)。结果结构数据没有显示出明显的扫描效应,因此在我们的特定队列中没有从协调中受益。事实上,对某些感兴趣的地区来说,试图统一的做法掩盖了真正的生物效应。扩散数据包含明显的扫描效应,并通过各种方法成功地进行了协调,从而减小了扫描效应,更好地检测了真实的生物效应。与《neuroCombat》和《gamCombat》相比,《LongCombat》降低了对横断面白质数据的扫描效果,但在模拟中错误发现群体差异的可能性略低。所有方法和指标的假阳性率均未显著超过5%。结论结构数据的统计协调并不总是必要的,没有扫描效应的协调可能是有害的。强烈建议将扩散MRI数据与neuroCombat、longCombat和gamCombat在横断面和纵向设置中表现良好的数据进行协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroimage. Reports
Neuroimage. Reports Neuroscience (General)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
87 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信