A Nominal Group Technique Study of Patients Who Identify as Black or African American and Access to Renal Transplantation.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Camilla W Nonterah, Shawn O Utsey, Gaurav Gupta, Sawyer Wilkins, Heather M Gardiner
{"title":"A Nominal Group Technique Study of Patients Who Identify as Black or African American and Access to Renal Transplantation.","authors":"Camilla W Nonterah,&nbsp;Shawn O Utsey,&nbsp;Gaurav Gupta,&nbsp;Sawyer Wilkins,&nbsp;Heather M Gardiner","doi":"10.1177/15269248231164164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Completion of the renal transplant evaluation has been associated with several barriers for patients who identify as Black or African American. This study sought to prioritize barriers to and motivators of completing the renal transplant evaluation. <b>Methods/Approach:</b> Semi-structured interviews and focus groups with a nominal group technique were used to generate priority scores. Transplant professionals (N = 23) were recruited from 9 transplant centers in the Mid-Atlantic, Mid-Western, and Southeastern parts of the United States. Black or African American identifying renal patients (N = 30) diagnosed with end-stage kidney disease were recruited from 1 transplant center in the Mid-Atlantic region. <b>Findings:</b> Priority scores were created to assess the quantitative data of participant rankings of top barriers and motivators. The most significant barriers identified by both patients and transplant professionals comprised financial constraints, insurance issues, difficulty navigating the healthcare system, transportation difficulties, and multiple health problems. Facilitators consisted of family/social support, transplant education, patient navigators, comprehensive insurance, and physician repertoire and investment. A qualitative description of the ranked factors resulted in themes classified as intrapersonal, health, socioeconomic, transplant-specific healthcare, and general healthcare. <b>Conclusion:</b> These findings provided vital information to transplant centers nationwide about assessing the influences of renal transplant evaluation completion. Achieving equity in access to transplantation for Black or African American renal patients requires multilayered approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":"33 2","pages":"141-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248231164164","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Completion of the renal transplant evaluation has been associated with several barriers for patients who identify as Black or African American. This study sought to prioritize barriers to and motivators of completing the renal transplant evaluation. Methods/Approach: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups with a nominal group technique were used to generate priority scores. Transplant professionals (N = 23) were recruited from 9 transplant centers in the Mid-Atlantic, Mid-Western, and Southeastern parts of the United States. Black or African American identifying renal patients (N = 30) diagnosed with end-stage kidney disease were recruited from 1 transplant center in the Mid-Atlantic region. Findings: Priority scores were created to assess the quantitative data of participant rankings of top barriers and motivators. The most significant barriers identified by both patients and transplant professionals comprised financial constraints, insurance issues, difficulty navigating the healthcare system, transportation difficulties, and multiple health problems. Facilitators consisted of family/social support, transplant education, patient navigators, comprehensive insurance, and physician repertoire and investment. A qualitative description of the ranked factors resulted in themes classified as intrapersonal, health, socioeconomic, transplant-specific healthcare, and general healthcare. Conclusion: These findings provided vital information to transplant centers nationwide about assessing the influences of renal transplant evaluation completion. Achieving equity in access to transplantation for Black or African American renal patients requires multilayered approaches.

识别为黑人或非裔美国人的患者获得肾移植的名义组技术研究。
对于黑人或非裔美国人来说,完成肾移植评估与一些障碍有关。本研究试图优先考虑完成肾移植评估的障碍和激励因素。方法/方法:采用半结构化访谈和名义小组技术的焦点小组来产生优先级评分。移植专业人员(N = 23)从美国大西洋中部、中西部和东南部的9个移植中心招募。从中大西洋地区的1个移植中心招募确诊为终末期肾病的黑人或非裔美国人肾脏患者(N = 30)。研究发现:优先级分数被创建来评估参与者对顶级障碍和激励因素排名的定量数据。患者和移植专业人员确定的最重要的障碍包括财务限制、保险问题、难以驾驭医疗保健系统、交通困难和多种健康问题。辅助因素包括家庭/社会支持、移植教育、患者指导、综合保险、医师储备和投资。对排名因素的定性描述导致主题分类为个人,健康,社会经济,移植特定医疗保健和一般医疗保健。结论:这些发现为全国移植中心评估肾移植评估完成的影响提供了重要信息。实现黑人或非裔美国人肾脏患者获得移植的公平需要多层次的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Progress in Transplantation
Progress in Transplantation SURGERY-TRANSPLANTATION
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Transplantation (PIT) is the official journal of NATCO, The Organization for Transplant Professionals. Journal Partners include: Australasian Transplant Coordinators Association and Society for Transplant Social Workers. PIT reflects the multi-disciplinary team approach to procurement and clinical aspects of organ and tissue transplantation by providing a professional forum for exchange of the continually changing body of knowledge in transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信