Culturally Responsive Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Ethnically Diverse Populations.

IF 17.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY
Stanley J Huey, Alayna L Park, Chardée A Galán, Crystal X Wang
{"title":"Culturally Responsive Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Ethnically Diverse Populations.","authors":"Stanley J Huey,&nbsp;Alayna L Park,&nbsp;Chardée A Galán,&nbsp;Crystal X Wang","doi":"10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-080921-072750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is often referred to as the \"gold standard\" treatment for mental health problems, given the large body of evidence supporting its efficacy. However, there are persistent questions about the generalizability of CBTs to culturally diverse populations and whether culturally sensitive approaches are warranted. In this review, we synthesize the literature on CBT for ethnic minorities, with an emphasis on randomized trials that address cultural sensitivity within the context of CBT. In general, we find that CBT is effective for ethnic minorities with diverse mental health problems, although nonsignificant trends suggest that CBT effects may be somewhat weaker for ethnic minorities compared to Whites. We find mixed support for the cultural adaptation of CBTs, but evidence for cultural sensitivity training of CBT clinicians is lacking, given a dearth of relevant trials. Based on the limited evidence thus far, we summarize three broad models for addressing cultural issues when providing CBT to diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50755,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Clinical Psychology","volume":"19 ","pages":"51-78"},"PeriodicalIF":17.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-080921-072750","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is often referred to as the "gold standard" treatment for mental health problems, given the large body of evidence supporting its efficacy. However, there are persistent questions about the generalizability of CBTs to culturally diverse populations and whether culturally sensitive approaches are warranted. In this review, we synthesize the literature on CBT for ethnic minorities, with an emphasis on randomized trials that address cultural sensitivity within the context of CBT. In general, we find that CBT is effective for ethnic minorities with diverse mental health problems, although nonsignificant trends suggest that CBT effects may be somewhat weaker for ethnic minorities compared to Whites. We find mixed support for the cultural adaptation of CBTs, but evidence for cultural sensitivity training of CBT clinicians is lacking, given a dearth of relevant trials. Based on the limited evidence thus far, we summarize three broad models for addressing cultural issues when providing CBT to diverse populations.

多元种族人群的文化反应性认知行为疗法。
认知行为疗法(CBT)通常被认为是治疗心理健康问题的“黄金标准”,因为有大量证据支持其疗效。然而,关于cbt在不同文化人群中的普遍性,以及文化敏感性方法是否有必要,一直存在一些问题。在这篇综述中,我们综合了关于少数民族CBT的文献,重点是在CBT背景下研究文化敏感性的随机试验。总的来说,我们发现CBT对不同心理健康问题的少数民族是有效的,尽管没有显著的趋势表明CBT对少数民族的效果可能比白人弱一些。我们发现CBT的文化适应性得到了不同程度的支持,但由于缺乏相关试验,缺乏CBT临床医生文化敏感性培训的证据。基于迄今为止有限的证据,我们总结了在向不同人群提供CBT时解决文化问题的三种广泛模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
31.50
自引率
0.50%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Clinical Psychology is a publication that has been available since 2005. It offers comprehensive reviews on significant developments in the field of clinical psychology and psychiatry. The journal covers various aspects including research, theory, and the application of psychological principles to address recognized disorders such as schizophrenia, mood, anxiety, childhood, substance use, cognitive, and personality disorders. Additionally, the articles also touch upon broader issues that cut across the field, such as diagnosis, treatment, social policy, and cross-cultural and legal issues. Recently, the current volume of this journal has transitioned from a gated access model to an open access format through the Annual Reviews' Subscribe to Open program. All articles published in this volume are now available under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), allowing for widespread distribution and use. The journal is also abstracted and indexed in various databases including Scopus, Science Citation Index Expanded, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Academic Search, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信