Ai-Leng Foong-Reichert, Kelly A Grindrod, David J Edwards, Zubin Austin, Sherilyn K D Houle
{"title":"Pharmacist Disciplinary Action: What Do Pharmacists Get in Trouble for?","authors":"Ai-Leng Foong-Reichert, Kelly A Grindrod, David J Edwards, Zubin Austin, Sherilyn K D Houle","doi":"10.12927/hcpol.2023.27034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to determine the reasons for disciplinary action and resultant consequences for Canadian pharmacists and any associations with demographic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Regulatory body disciplinary action cases from 10 Canadian provinces were coded. Demographic information was coded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 665 pharmacist cases from nine provinces between January 2010 and December 2020. The rate of disciplinary action was low (1.37 cases/1,000 practitioners/year). Professional misconduct was the most common category of violation. Male pharmacists were overrepresented in disciplinary action cases. Most cases involved community pharmacists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study is the first, to our knowledge, in Canada to analyze the demographic factors of pharmacists subjected to disciplinary action. It updates a previous review of pharmacist disciplinary action (Foong et al. 2018).</p>","PeriodicalId":39389,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 3","pages":"60-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10019516/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2023.27034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to determine the reasons for disciplinary action and resultant consequences for Canadian pharmacists and any associations with demographic factors.
Methods: Regulatory body disciplinary action cases from 10 Canadian provinces were coded. Demographic information was coded.
Results: There were 665 pharmacist cases from nine provinces between January 2010 and December 2020. The rate of disciplinary action was low (1.37 cases/1,000 practitioners/year). Professional misconduct was the most common category of violation. Male pharmacists were overrepresented in disciplinary action cases. Most cases involved community pharmacists.
Conclusion: This study is the first, to our knowledge, in Canada to analyze the demographic factors of pharmacists subjected to disciplinary action. It updates a previous review of pharmacist disciplinary action (Foong et al. 2018).
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
