Diagnostic yield and safety of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy for diffuse parenchymal lung diseases diagnosis: Comparison between 1.7-mm and 1.9-mm probes.
C Ravaglia, F Sultani, S Piciucchi, A Dubini, A J De Grauw, S Martinello, S Oldani, S Maitan, F Stella, V Poletti
{"title":"Diagnostic yield and safety of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy for diffuse parenchymal lung diseases diagnosis: Comparison between 1.7-mm and 1.9-mm probes.","authors":"C Ravaglia, F Sultani, S Piciucchi, A Dubini, A J De Grauw, S Martinello, S Oldani, S Maitan, F Stella, V Poletti","doi":"10.1016/j.pulmoe.2023.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Purpose of the research</i>: transbronchial lung cryobiopsy has been recently accepted as a valid and less invasive alternative to surgical lung biopsy. The purpose of this randomized controlled study was to evaluate, for the first time, the quality and safety of biopsy specimens obtained by using the new disposable 1.7-mm cryoprobe compared with the standard re-usable 1.9 mm cryoprobe in the diagnosis of diffuse parenchymal lung diseases. <i>Methods</i>: 60 consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned to two different groups: 1.9 mm (group A) and 1.7 mm (group B); primary endpoints were pathological and multidisciplinary diagnostic yield, sample size and complication rate. <i>Principal results</i>: the pathological diagnostic yield of cryobiopsy was 100% in group A and 93.3% in group B (<i>p</i> = 0.718); cryobiopsy median diameter was 6.8 mm in group A and 6.7 mm in group B (<i>p</i> = 0,5241). Pneumothorax occurred in 9 patients in group A and 10 in group B (<i>p</i> = 0.951); mild-to-moderate bleeding in 7 cases and 9 cases in group A and B respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.559). No death or severe adverse events were observed. <i>Conclusions</i>: there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups, regarding diagnostic yield, adverse events and sampling adequacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":54237,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonology","volume":" ","pages":"2416785"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pulmoe.2023.04.003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of the research: transbronchial lung cryobiopsy has been recently accepted as a valid and less invasive alternative to surgical lung biopsy. The purpose of this randomized controlled study was to evaluate, for the first time, the quality and safety of biopsy specimens obtained by using the new disposable 1.7-mm cryoprobe compared with the standard re-usable 1.9 mm cryoprobe in the diagnosis of diffuse parenchymal lung diseases. Methods: 60 consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned to two different groups: 1.9 mm (group A) and 1.7 mm (group B); primary endpoints were pathological and multidisciplinary diagnostic yield, sample size and complication rate. Principal results: the pathological diagnostic yield of cryobiopsy was 100% in group A and 93.3% in group B (p = 0.718); cryobiopsy median diameter was 6.8 mm in group A and 6.7 mm in group B (p = 0,5241). Pneumothorax occurred in 9 patients in group A and 10 in group B (p = 0.951); mild-to-moderate bleeding in 7 cases and 9 cases in group A and B respectively (p = 0.559). No death or severe adverse events were observed. Conclusions: there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups, regarding diagnostic yield, adverse events and sampling adequacy.
PulmonologyMedicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
159
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍:
Pulmonology (previously Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia) is the official journal of the Portuguese Society of Pulmonology (Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia/SPP). The journal publishes 6 issues per year and focuses on respiratory system diseases in adults and clinical research. It accepts various types of articles including peer-reviewed original articles, review articles, editorials, and opinion articles. The journal is published in English and is freely accessible through its website, as well as Medline and other databases. It is indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded, Journal of Citation Reports, Index Medicus/MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE/Excerpta Medica.