Implant-assisted removable partial dentures: Part II. a systematic review of the effects of implant position on the biomechanical behavior.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-01-16 Epub Date: 2023-05-20 DOI:10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00032
Shinichiro Kuroshima, Muneteru Sasaki, Farah A Al-Omari, Yusuke Uto, Yoshikazu Ohta, Yusuke Uchida, Takashi Sawase
{"title":"Implant-assisted removable partial dentures: Part II. a systematic review of the effects of implant position on the biomechanical behavior.","authors":"Shinichiro Kuroshima, Muneteru Sasaki, Farah A Al-Omari, Yusuke Uto, Yoshikazu Ohta, Yusuke Uchida, Takashi Sawase","doi":"10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of implant placement sites on the biomechanical behavior of implant-assisted removable partial dentures (IARPDs) using finite element analysis (FEA).</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Two reviewers independently conducted manual searches of the PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest databases for articles investigating implant location in IARPDs using FEA, according to the 2020 Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. Studies published in English up to August 1, 2022, were included in the analysis based on the critical question.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven articles meeting the inclusion criteria were systematically reviewed. Six studies investigated mandibular Kennedy Class I and one study investigated mandibular Kennedy Class II. Implant placement reduced the displacement and stress distribution of the IARPD components, including dental implants and abutment teeth, regardless of the Kennedy Class type and dental implant placement site. Most of the included studies showed that, based on the biomechanical behavior, the molar region, rather than the premolar region, is the preferred implant placement site. None of the selected studies investigated the maxillary Kennedy Class I and II.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the FEA regarding mandibular IARPDs, we concluded that implant placement in both the premolar and molar regions improves the biomechanical behaviors of IARPD components, regardless of the Kennedy Class. Implant placement in the molar region results in more suitable biomechanical behaviors compared with implant placement in the premolar region in Kennedy Class I. No conclusion was reached for Kennedy Class II due to the lack of relevant studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of implant placement sites on the biomechanical behavior of implant-assisted removable partial dentures (IARPDs) using finite element analysis (FEA).

Study selection: Two reviewers independently conducted manual searches of the PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest databases for articles investigating implant location in IARPDs using FEA, according to the 2020 Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. Studies published in English up to August 1, 2022, were included in the analysis based on the critical question.

Results: Seven articles meeting the inclusion criteria were systematically reviewed. Six studies investigated mandibular Kennedy Class I and one study investigated mandibular Kennedy Class II. Implant placement reduced the displacement and stress distribution of the IARPD components, including dental implants and abutment teeth, regardless of the Kennedy Class type and dental implant placement site. Most of the included studies showed that, based on the biomechanical behavior, the molar region, rather than the premolar region, is the preferred implant placement site. None of the selected studies investigated the maxillary Kennedy Class I and II.

Conclusions: Based on the FEA regarding mandibular IARPDs, we concluded that implant placement in both the premolar and molar regions improves the biomechanical behaviors of IARPD components, regardless of the Kennedy Class. Implant placement in the molar region results in more suitable biomechanical behaviors compared with implant placement in the premolar region in Kennedy Class I. No conclusion was reached for Kennedy Class II due to the lack of relevant studies.

种植体辅助可摘局部义齿:种植体位置对生物力学行为影响的系统回顾。
目的:本系统综述旨在利用有限元分析(FEA)评估种植体植入位置对种植体辅助可摘局部义齿(IARPD)生物力学行为的影响:根据《2020 年系统综述与元分析声明》,两名审稿人分别在 PubMed、Scopus 和 ProQuest 数据库中手动检索使用有限元分析研究 IARPD 种植体位置的文章。根据关键问题,分析纳入了截至 2022 年 8 月 1 日发表的英文研究:对符合纳入标准的七篇文章进行了系统回顾。六项研究调查了下颌肯尼迪I类,一项研究调查了下颌肯尼迪II类。无论肯尼迪分级类型和种植体植入部位如何,种植体植入都能减少包括种植体和基牙在内的 IARPD 部件的位移和应力分布。所纳入的大多数研究表明,根据生物力学行为,臼齿区而不是前臼齿区是首选的种植体植入部位。结论:根据下颌 IARPD 的有限元分析,我们得出结论:无论肯尼迪等级如何,将种植体植入前磨牙区和磨牙区都能改善 IARPD 成分的生物力学行为。在肯尼迪分级 I 中,将种植体植入磨牙区比植入前磨牙区能获得更合适的生物力学表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信