The Effect of Intervention for Improving Colonoscopy Quality Is Associated with the Personality Traits of Endoscopists.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Gut and Liver Pub Date : 2024-03-15 Epub Date: 2023-05-09 DOI:10.5009/gnl220280
Hyun Ho Choi, Soo-Yoon Sung, Bo-In Lee, Hyun Cho, Yunho Jung, Jae Myung Park, Young-Seok Cho, Kang-Moon Lee, Sang Woo Kim, Hwang Choi, Hiun-Suk Chae, Myung-Gyu Choi
{"title":"The Effect of Intervention for Improving Colonoscopy Quality Is Associated with the Personality Traits of Endoscopists.","authors":"Hyun Ho Choi, Soo-Yoon Sung, Bo-In Lee, Hyun Cho, Yunho Jung, Jae Myung Park, Young-Seok Cho, Kang-Moon Lee, Sang Woo Kim, Hwang Choi, Hiun-Suk Chae, Myung-Gyu Choi","doi":"10.5009/gnl220280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>This study investigated whether the personality traits of endoscopists are associated with the effect of interventions for the improvement of colonoscopy quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, multicenter, single-blind study was performed with 13 endoscopists in three health screening centers over a 12-month period. Quality indicators (QIs), including adenoma detection rate (ADR), polyp detection rate (PDR), and withdrawal time, were measured every 3 months. Consecutive interventions for the improvement of colonoscopy quality were conducted every 3 months, which included the personal notification of QIs, the in-group notification of QIs, and finally a targeted \"quality education\" session. The personality traits of each endoscopist were evaluated for perfectionism, fear of negative evaluation, and cognitive flexibility after the last QI assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4,095 colonoscopies were evaluated to measure the QIs of the individual endoscopists for 12 months. The mean ADR, PDR, and withdrawal time of the 13 endoscopists were 32.3%, 47.7%, and 394 seconds at baseline and increased to 39.0%, 55.1%, and 430 seconds by the end of the study (p=0.003, p=0.006, and p=0.004, respectively). Among the three interventions, only quality education significantly improved QIs: ADR, 36.0% to 39.0% (odds ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.63). The improvement of ADR and PDR by education was significantly associated with perfectionism (r=0.617, p=0.033 and r=0.635, p=0.027, respectively) and fear of negative evaluation (r=0.704, p=0.011 and r=0.761, p=0.004, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Education can improve colonoscopy quality, and its effect size is associated with an endoscopist's personal traits such as perfectionism and fear of negative evaluation (Clinical-Trials.gov Registry NCT03796169).</p>","PeriodicalId":12885,"journal":{"name":"Gut and Liver","volume":" ","pages":"265-274"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10938159/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gut and Liver","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl220280","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: This study investigated whether the personality traits of endoscopists are associated with the effect of interventions for the improvement of colonoscopy quality.

Methods: This prospective, multicenter, single-blind study was performed with 13 endoscopists in three health screening centers over a 12-month period. Quality indicators (QIs), including adenoma detection rate (ADR), polyp detection rate (PDR), and withdrawal time, were measured every 3 months. Consecutive interventions for the improvement of colonoscopy quality were conducted every 3 months, which included the personal notification of QIs, the in-group notification of QIs, and finally a targeted "quality education" session. The personality traits of each endoscopist were evaluated for perfectionism, fear of negative evaluation, and cognitive flexibility after the last QI assessment.

Results: A total of 4,095 colonoscopies were evaluated to measure the QIs of the individual endoscopists for 12 months. The mean ADR, PDR, and withdrawal time of the 13 endoscopists were 32.3%, 47.7%, and 394 seconds at baseline and increased to 39.0%, 55.1%, and 430 seconds by the end of the study (p=0.003, p=0.006, and p=0.004, respectively). Among the three interventions, only quality education significantly improved QIs: ADR, 36.0% to 39.0% (odds ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.63). The improvement of ADR and PDR by education was significantly associated with perfectionism (r=0.617, p=0.033 and r=0.635, p=0.027, respectively) and fear of negative evaluation (r=0.704, p=0.011 and r=0.761, p=0.004, respectively).

Conclusions: Education can improve colonoscopy quality, and its effect size is associated with an endoscopist's personal traits such as perfectionism and fear of negative evaluation (Clinical-Trials.gov Registry NCT03796169).

提高结肠镜检查质量的干预效果与内镜医师的性格特征有关。
背景/目的本研究调查了内镜医师的个性特征是否与提高结肠镜检查质量的干预效果有关:这项前瞻性、多中心、单盲研究由三个健康检查中心的 13 名内镜医师进行,为期 12 个月。每 3 个月测量一次质量指标(QIs),包括腺瘤检出率(ADR)、息肉检出率(PDR)和退出时间。为提高结肠镜检查质量,每 3 个月进行一次连续干预,包括个人通报质量指标、小组内通报质量指标,最后是有针对性的 "质量教育 "课程。在最后一次 QI 评估后,对每位内镜医师的人格特质进行了评估,包括完美主义、害怕负面评价和认知灵活性:共对 4095 例结肠镜检查进行了评估,以衡量内镜医师在 12 个月内的 QIs。13 名内镜医师的平均 ADR、PDR 和退出时间在基线时分别为 32.3%、47.7% 和 394 秒,在研究结束时分别增加到 39.0%、55.1% 和 430 秒(p=0.003、p=0.006 和 p=0.004)。在三种干预措施中,只有素质教育能明显改善质量指标:ADR:36.0% 上升至 39.0%(几率比:1.28;95% 置信区间:1.01 至 1.63)。教育对ADR和PDR的改善与完美主义(分别为r=0.617,p=0.033和r=0.635,p=0.027)和对负面评价的恐惧(分别为r=0.704,p=0.011和r=0.761,p=0.004)显著相关:结论:教育可提高结肠镜检查质量,其效果大小与内镜医师的个人特质有关,如完美主义和对负面评价的恐惧(Clinical-Trials.gov 登记号 NCT03796169)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gut and Liver
Gut and Liver 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
8.80%
发文量
119
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gut and Liver is an international journal of gastroenterology, focusing on the gastrointestinal tract, liver, biliary tree, pancreas, motility, and neurogastroenterology. Gut and Liver delivers up-to-date, authoritative papers on both clinical and research-based topics in gastroenterology. The Journal publishes original articles, case reports, brief communications, letters to the editor and invited review articles in the field of gastroenterology. The Journal is operated by internationally renowned editorial boards and designed to provide a global opportunity to promote academic developments in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. Gut and Liver is jointly owned and operated by 8 affiliated societies in the field of gastroenterology, namely: the Korean Society of Gastroenterology, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, the Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, the Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, and the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信