Predicting vigilance vulnerability during 1 and 2 weeks of sleep restriction with baseline performance metrics.

June C Lo, Jit Wei A Ang, Tiffany B Koa, Ju Lynn Ong, Julian Lim
{"title":"Predicting vigilance vulnerability during 1 and 2 weeks of sleep restriction with baseline performance metrics.","authors":"June C Lo,&nbsp;Jit Wei A Ang,&nbsp;Tiffany B Koa,&nbsp;Ju Lynn Ong,&nbsp;Julian Lim","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpac040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>We attempted to predict vigilance performance in adolescents during partial sleep deprivation using task summary metrics and drift diffusion modelling measures (DDM) derived from baseline vigilance performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the Need for Sleep studies, 57 adolescents (age = 15-19 years) underwent two baseline nights of 9-h time-in-bed (TIB), followed by two cycles of weekday sleep-restricted nights (5-h or 6.5-h TIB) and weekend recovery nights (9-h TIB). Vigilance was assessed daily with the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT), with the number of lapses (response times ≥ 500 ms) as the primary outcome measure. The two DDM predictors were drift rate, which quantifies the speed of information accumulation and determines how quickly an individual derives a decision response, and non-decision time range, which indicates within-subject variation in physical, non-cognitive responding, e.g. motor actions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first week of sleep curtailment, faster accumulation of lapses was significantly associated with more lapses at baseline (<i>p</i> = .02), but not the two baseline DDM metrics: drift and non-decision time range (<i>p</i> > .07). On the other hand, faster accumulation of lapses and greater increment in reaction time variability from the first to the second week of sleep restriction were associated with lower drift (<i>p</i> < .007) at baseline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among adolescents, baseline PVT lapses can predict inter-individual differences in vigilance vulnerability during 1 week of sleep restriction on weekdays, while drift more consistently predicts vulnerability during more weeks of sleep curtailment.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial information: </strong>Effects of Napping in Sleep-Restricted Adolescents, clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02838095. The Cognitive and Metabolic Effects of Sleep Restriction in Adolescents (NFS4), clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03333512.</p>","PeriodicalId":74808,"journal":{"name":"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10104386/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpac040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Study objectives: We attempted to predict vigilance performance in adolescents during partial sleep deprivation using task summary metrics and drift diffusion modelling measures (DDM) derived from baseline vigilance performance.

Methods: In the Need for Sleep studies, 57 adolescents (age = 15-19 years) underwent two baseline nights of 9-h time-in-bed (TIB), followed by two cycles of weekday sleep-restricted nights (5-h or 6.5-h TIB) and weekend recovery nights (9-h TIB). Vigilance was assessed daily with the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT), with the number of lapses (response times ≥ 500 ms) as the primary outcome measure. The two DDM predictors were drift rate, which quantifies the speed of information accumulation and determines how quickly an individual derives a decision response, and non-decision time range, which indicates within-subject variation in physical, non-cognitive responding, e.g. motor actions.

Results: In the first week of sleep curtailment, faster accumulation of lapses was significantly associated with more lapses at baseline (p = .02), but not the two baseline DDM metrics: drift and non-decision time range (p > .07). On the other hand, faster accumulation of lapses and greater increment in reaction time variability from the first to the second week of sleep restriction were associated with lower drift (p < .007) at baseline.

Conclusions: Among adolescents, baseline PVT lapses can predict inter-individual differences in vigilance vulnerability during 1 week of sleep restriction on weekdays, while drift more consistently predicts vulnerability during more weeks of sleep curtailment.

Clinical trial information: Effects of Napping in Sleep-Restricted Adolescents, clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02838095. The Cognitive and Metabolic Effects of Sleep Restriction in Adolescents (NFS4), clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03333512.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用基线表现指标预测睡眠受限1周和2周期间的警惕性脆弱性。
研究目的:我们试图使用任务总结指标和基于基线警戒表现的漂移扩散建模指标(DDM)来预测部分睡眠剥夺期间青少年的警戒表现。方法:在睡眠需求研究中,57名青少年(年龄=15-19岁)接受了两个基线夜晚的9小时卧床时间(TIB),然后是两个周期的工作日睡眠受限夜晚(5小时或6.5小时TIB)和周末恢复夜晚(9小时TIB。每天使用心理运动警戒任务(PVT)对警戒进行评估,以失误次数(反应时间≥500ms)为主要结果指标。两个DDM预测因子是漂移率和非决策时间范围,漂移率量化了信息积累的速度,并确定了个体得出决策反应的速度,非决策时间区间表明了受试者在身体、非认知反应(如运动动作)方面的变化。结果:在睡眠减少的第一周,失误累积得更快与基线时的失误次数更多显著相关(p=.02),但与两个基线DDM指标无关:漂移和非决策时间范围(p>.07)。另一方面,从睡眠限制的第一周到第二周,失误累积得更快,反应时间变异性增加得更大,这与基线时较低的漂移有关(p<007)。结论:在青少年中,基线PVT失误可以预测工作日睡眠受限1周期间警惕脆弱性的个体间差异,而漂移更一致地预测睡眠受限更多周期间的脆弱性。临床试验信息:睡眠受限青少年小睡的影响,clinicaltrials.gov,NCT02838095。青少年睡眠限制的认知和代谢影响(NFS4),clinicaltrials.gov,NCT03333512。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信