Efficacy of skin-to-skin vs. cloth-to-cloth contact for thermoregulation in low birth weight newborns: a randomized crossover trial.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Reshma K Pujara, Vaibhava Upadhyay, Jigar P Thacker, Bhavna B Rana, Sangita S Patel, Jigna M Joshi, Mayur K Shinde, Somashekhar M Nimbalkar, Dipen V Patel
{"title":"Efficacy of skin-to-skin vs. cloth-to-cloth contact for thermoregulation in low birth weight newborns: a randomized crossover trial.","authors":"Reshma K Pujara,&nbsp;Vaibhava Upadhyay,&nbsp;Jigar P Thacker,&nbsp;Bhavna B Rana,&nbsp;Sangita S Patel,&nbsp;Jigna M Joshi,&nbsp;Mayur K Shinde,&nbsp;Somashekhar M Nimbalkar,&nbsp;Dipen V Patel","doi":"10.1093/tropej/fmad013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Skin-to-skin contact (SSC) is effective to maintain normal temperature in low birth weight (LBW) newborns. However, there are several barriers related to privacy and space availability for its optimum utilization. We used cloth-to-cloth contact (CCC), i.e. placing the newborn in Kangaroo position without removing cloths as an innovative alternative to SSC to test its efficacy for thermoregulation and feasibility as compared to SSC in LBW newborns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The newborns eligible for Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) in step-down nursery were included in this randomized crossover trial. Newborns received SSC or CCC as per randomization on the first day and then crossed over to other group on the next day and so on. A feasibility questionnaire was asked to the mothers and the nurses. Axillary temperature was measured at various time intervals. Group comparisons were made by either using independent sample t-test or Chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 23 newborns received KMC for total 152 occasions in the SSC group and 149 times in the CCC group. There was no significant temperature difference between the groups at any time-point. Mean (standard deviation) gain of temperature at 120 min in the CCC group [0.43 (0.34)°C] was comparable to the SSC group [0.49 (0.36)°C] (p = 0.13). We did not observe any adverse effect of CCC. Most mothers and nurses perceived CCC feasible in hospital settings and felt that it could be feasible in-home settings too.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CCC was safe, more feasible and not inferior to SSC for maintaining thermoregulation in LBW newborns.</p>","PeriodicalId":17521,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tropical Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tropical Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmad013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Skin-to-skin contact (SSC) is effective to maintain normal temperature in low birth weight (LBW) newborns. However, there are several barriers related to privacy and space availability for its optimum utilization. We used cloth-to-cloth contact (CCC), i.e. placing the newborn in Kangaroo position without removing cloths as an innovative alternative to SSC to test its efficacy for thermoregulation and feasibility as compared to SSC in LBW newborns.

Methods: The newborns eligible for Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) in step-down nursery were included in this randomized crossover trial. Newborns received SSC or CCC as per randomization on the first day and then crossed over to other group on the next day and so on. A feasibility questionnaire was asked to the mothers and the nurses. Axillary temperature was measured at various time intervals. Group comparisons were made by either using independent sample t-test or Chi-square test.

Results: A total of 23 newborns received KMC for total 152 occasions in the SSC group and 149 times in the CCC group. There was no significant temperature difference between the groups at any time-point. Mean (standard deviation) gain of temperature at 120 min in the CCC group [0.43 (0.34)°C] was comparable to the SSC group [0.49 (0.36)°C] (p = 0.13). We did not observe any adverse effect of CCC. Most mothers and nurses perceived CCC feasible in hospital settings and felt that it could be feasible in-home settings too.

Conclusion: CCC was safe, more feasible and not inferior to SSC for maintaining thermoregulation in LBW newborns.

皮肤对皮肤与布对布接触对低出生体重新生儿体温调节的效果:一项随机交叉试验。
目的:皮肤接触(SSC)是低出生体重儿(LBW)体温维持的有效方法。然而,在隐私和空间可用性方面存在一些障碍,无法实现其最佳利用。我们使用布对布接触(CCC),即将新生儿置于袋鼠体位而不脱下衣服,作为SSC的创新替代方案,以测试其与LBW新生儿SSC相比的体温调节效果和可行性。方法:采用随机交叉试验方法,选取符合“袋鼠妈妈护理”(KMC)条件的新生儿作为研究对象。新生儿第一天按随机分组接受SSC或CCC,第二天转入另一组,依此类推。对母亲和护士进行可行性问卷调查。在不同的时间间隔测量腋窝温度。组间比较采用独立样本t检验或卡方检验。结果:SSC组共23例新生儿接受KMC治疗,共152次,CCC组共149次。各组在任何时间点的体温均无显著差异。120 min时,CCC组的平均(标准偏差)温度增益[0.43(0.34)°C]与SSC组[0.49(0.36)°C]相当(p = 0.13)。我们没有观察到CCC的任何不良反应。大多数母亲和护士认为CCC在医院环境中是可行的,并且认为它在家庭环境中也是可行的。结论:CCC对低体重新生儿体温调节的维持安全、可行,且不逊于SSC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 医学-热带医学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Tropical Pediatrics provides a link between theory and practice in the field. Papers report key results of clinical and community research, and considerations of programme development. More general descriptive pieces are included when they have application to work preceeding elsewhere. The journal also presents review articles, book reviews and, occasionally, short monographs and selections of important papers delivered at relevant conferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信