Effects of more natural housing conditions on the muscular and skeletal characteristics of female C57BL/6J mice.

IF 2.7 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Paul Mieske, Julia Scheinpflug, Timur Alexander Yorgan, Laura Brylka, Rupert Palme, Ute Hobbiesiefken, Juliane Preikschat, Lars Lewejohann, Kai Diederich
{"title":"Effects of more natural housing conditions on the muscular and skeletal characteristics of female C57BL/6J mice.","authors":"Paul Mieske,&nbsp;Julia Scheinpflug,&nbsp;Timur Alexander Yorgan,&nbsp;Laura Brylka,&nbsp;Rupert Palme,&nbsp;Ute Hobbiesiefken,&nbsp;Juliane Preikschat,&nbsp;Lars Lewejohann,&nbsp;Kai Diederich","doi":"10.1186/s42826-023-00160-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enrichment of home cages in laboratory experiments offers clear advantages, but has been criticized in some respects. First, there is a lack of definition, which makes methodological uniformity difficult. Second, there is concern that the enrichment of home cages may increase the variance of results in experiments. Here, the influence of more natural housing conditions on physiological parameters of female C57BL/6J mice was investigated from an animal welfare point of view. For this purpose, the animals were kept in three different housing conditions: conventional cage housing, enriched housing and the semi naturalistic environment. The focus was on musculoskeletal changes after long-term environmental enrichment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The housing conditions had a long-term effect on the body weight of the test animals. The more complex and natural the home cage, the heavier the animals. This was associated with increased adipose deposits in the animals. There were no significant changes in muscle and bone characteristics except for single clues (femur diameter, bone resorption marker CTX-1). Additionally, the animals in the semi naturalistic environment (SNE) were found to have the fewest bone anomalies. Housing in the SNE appears to have the least effect on stress hormone concentrations. The lowest oxygen uptake was observed in enriched cage housing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite increasing values, observed body weights were in the normal and strain-typical range. Overall, musculoskeletal parameters were slightly improved and age-related effects appear to have been attenuated. The variances in the results were not increased by more natural housing. This confirms the suitability of the applied housing conditions to ensure and increase animal welfare in laboratory experiments.</p>","PeriodicalId":17993,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Animal Research","volume":"39 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186785/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Animal Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42826-023-00160-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Enrichment of home cages in laboratory experiments offers clear advantages, but has been criticized in some respects. First, there is a lack of definition, which makes methodological uniformity difficult. Second, there is concern that the enrichment of home cages may increase the variance of results in experiments. Here, the influence of more natural housing conditions on physiological parameters of female C57BL/6J mice was investigated from an animal welfare point of view. For this purpose, the animals were kept in three different housing conditions: conventional cage housing, enriched housing and the semi naturalistic environment. The focus was on musculoskeletal changes after long-term environmental enrichment.

Results: The housing conditions had a long-term effect on the body weight of the test animals. The more complex and natural the home cage, the heavier the animals. This was associated with increased adipose deposits in the animals. There were no significant changes in muscle and bone characteristics except for single clues (femur diameter, bone resorption marker CTX-1). Additionally, the animals in the semi naturalistic environment (SNE) were found to have the fewest bone anomalies. Housing in the SNE appears to have the least effect on stress hormone concentrations. The lowest oxygen uptake was observed in enriched cage housing.

Conclusions: Despite increasing values, observed body weights were in the normal and strain-typical range. Overall, musculoskeletal parameters were slightly improved and age-related effects appear to have been attenuated. The variances in the results were not increased by more natural housing. This confirms the suitability of the applied housing conditions to ensure and increase animal welfare in laboratory experiments.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

更自然的居住条件对雌性C57BL/6J小鼠肌肉和骨骼特征的影响
背景:在实验室实验中,家庭笼的富集具有明显的优势,但在某些方面受到批评。首先,缺乏定义,这使得方法上的统一变得困难。第二,有人担心家庭笼的富集可能会增加实验结果的方差。本实验从动物福利的角度研究了自然饲养条件对雌性C57BL/6J小鼠生理参数的影响。为此,这些动物被饲养在三种不同的住房条件下:传统的笼子住房,丰富的住房和半自然的环境。重点是长期环境富集后肌肉骨骼的变化。结果:饲养条件对试验动物的体重有长期影响。家里的笼子越复杂、越自然,动物就越重。这与动物体内脂肪沉积的增加有关。除单一线索(股骨直径、骨吸收标志物CTX-1)外,肌肉和骨骼特征无明显变化。此外,在半自然环境(SNE)中发现的动物骨骼异常最少。SNE中的住房似乎对应激激素浓度的影响最小。富氧笼壳的摄氧量最低。结论:观察到的体重虽然有所增加,但在正常和典型的应变范围内。总体而言,肌肉骨骼参数略有改善,年龄相关的影响似乎已经减弱。结果的差异并没有因为更多的自然住房而增加。这证实了适用的住房条件的适宜性,以确保和增加实验室实验中的动物福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信