Pre-transfusion Testing Using Crossmatching Agglutination Reaction Grades Combined With Rh Subgroup Phenotyping in Patients With Autoantibodies: A Three-year Experience at a Tertiary Hospital.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Jongmin Kim, Kyung-Hwa Shin, Hyerim Kim, Hyung-Hoi Kim, Hyun-Ji Lee
{"title":"Pre-transfusion Testing Using Crossmatching Agglutination Reaction Grades Combined With Rh Subgroup Phenotyping in Patients With Autoantibodies: A Three-year Experience at a Tertiary Hospital.","authors":"Jongmin Kim,&nbsp;Kyung-Hwa Shin,&nbsp;Hyerim Kim,&nbsp;Hyung-Hoi Kim,&nbsp;Hyun-Ji Lee","doi":"10.3343/alm.2023.43.5.470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The currently recommended pre-transfusion testing techniques for patients with autoantibodies are complex, time-consuming, and labor-intensive. Therefore, although the red blood cell (RBC) selection method using crossmatched RBC agglutination reaction grades (i.e., the \"least incompatible\" transfusion) is discouraged, many institutions still use it. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of this method combined with Rh subgroup phenotyping.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively investigated RBC transfusions from January 2019 to December 2021 in patients presenting as auto-control-positive via antibody identification (auto-control (+) group), where Rh subgroup phenotype-matched RBCs were selected based on the agglutination reaction grades of crossmatched units. For each study patient, an auto-control-negative patient was matched based on age, sex, department, and pre-transfusion Hb levels (auto-control (-) group). The mean Hb change per unit, transfusion-associated symptom/sign reports, and agglutination reaction grades upon crossmatching were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the auto-control (+) group, the Hb change per unit among different agglutination reaction grades of transfused RBCs and among different relative grades of transfused RBCs and crossmatching auto-controls was not significantly different (<i>P</i>=0.392 and <i>P</i>= 0.132, respectively). No significant difference was observed in Hb changes and transfusion-associated symptom/sign occurrence between the auto-control (+) and auto-control (-) groups (<i>P</i>=0.121 and <i>P</i>=0.822, respectively). In addition, no definite evidence of hemolysis in the auto-control (+) group was observed in the medical record review.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Together with Rh subgroup phenotyping, selecting the RBC unit with the lowest agglutination reaction grade upon crossmatching does not adversely affect transfusion efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":8421,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"43 5","pages":"470-476"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a6/14/alm-43-5-470.PMC10151280.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2023.43.5.470","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The currently recommended pre-transfusion testing techniques for patients with autoantibodies are complex, time-consuming, and labor-intensive. Therefore, although the red blood cell (RBC) selection method using crossmatched RBC agglutination reaction grades (i.e., the "least incompatible" transfusion) is discouraged, many institutions still use it. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of this method combined with Rh subgroup phenotyping.

Methods: We retrospectively investigated RBC transfusions from January 2019 to December 2021 in patients presenting as auto-control-positive via antibody identification (auto-control (+) group), where Rh subgroup phenotype-matched RBCs were selected based on the agglutination reaction grades of crossmatched units. For each study patient, an auto-control-negative patient was matched based on age, sex, department, and pre-transfusion Hb levels (auto-control (-) group). The mean Hb change per unit, transfusion-associated symptom/sign reports, and agglutination reaction grades upon crossmatching were analyzed.

Results: In the auto-control (+) group, the Hb change per unit among different agglutination reaction grades of transfused RBCs and among different relative grades of transfused RBCs and crossmatching auto-controls was not significantly different (P=0.392 and P= 0.132, respectively). No significant difference was observed in Hb changes and transfusion-associated symptom/sign occurrence between the auto-control (+) and auto-control (-) groups (P=0.121 and P=0.822, respectively). In addition, no definite evidence of hemolysis in the auto-control (+) group was observed in the medical record review.

Conclusions: Together with Rh subgroup phenotyping, selecting the RBC unit with the lowest agglutination reaction grade upon crossmatching does not adversely affect transfusion efficiency.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用交叉配型凝集反应等级结合Rh亚群表型对自身抗体患者进行输血前检测:一家三级医院三年的经验
背景:目前推荐的自身抗体患者输血前检测技术复杂、耗时、费力。因此,尽管不鼓励使用交叉匹配红细胞凝集反应等级(即“最不相容”输血)的红细胞(RBC)选择方法,但许多机构仍在使用它。我们的目的是评估该方法结合Rh亚群表型的有效性。方法:我们回顾性调查了2019年1月至2021年12月通过抗体鉴定为自身对照阳性的患者(自动对照(+)组)的红细胞输注,其中根据交叉匹配单位的凝集反应等级选择Rh亚组表型匹配的红细胞。对于每个研究患者,根据年龄、性别、科室和输血前Hb水平匹配一名自动对照阴性患者(自动对照(-)组)。分析每单位平均Hb变化、输血相关症状/体征报告和交叉配型凝集反应等级。结果:自动对照(+)组输血红细胞不同凝集反应等级之间、输血红细胞不同相对等级与交叉匹配自动对照之间单位血红蛋白变化无显著差异(P=0.392、P= 0.132)。自动控制(+)组和自动控制(-)组Hb变化和输血相关症状/体征发生无显著差异(P=0.121和P=0.822)。此外,在医疗记录回顾中没有观察到自动控制(+)组溶血的明确证据。结论:结合Rh亚群表型,在交叉配型中选择凝集反应等级最低的红细胞单位不会对输血效率产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Laboratory Medicine
Annals of Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
12.20%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Laboratory Medicine is the official journal of Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine. The journal title has been recently changed from the Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine (ISSN, 1598-6535) from the January issue of 2012. The JCR 2017 Impact factor of Ann Lab Med was 1.916.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信