Identifying Frailty in Thermal/Spa Clinical Setting: A Cross-Sectional Study.

JAR life Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.14283/jarlife.2022.5
C Jeandel, T Hanh
{"title":"Identifying Frailty in Thermal/Spa Clinical Setting: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"C Jeandel,&nbsp;T Hanh","doi":"10.14283/jarlife.2022.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No investigation has assessed frailty in the clinical setting of thermal/spa facilities, which often receive older patients with osteo-articular and musculoskeletal conditions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the prevalence of frailty in older adults receiving thermal/spa treatment and to gather preliminary evidence about the feasibility of integrating geriatric assessments, including frailty, in the routine clinical consultations in spa facilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed design, with a quantitative cross-sectional investigation performed among 197 volunteer patients (mean age 73.2 ± 6.4 years-old; 82.2% women) of seven French thermal/spa facilities and a qualitative investigation (semi-structured interviews) with the nine physicians working in the participating facilities. Frailty was defined according to a modified Fried frailty phenotype based on six self-reported criteria (including mobility impairment, nutritional status, and fatigue): individuals meeting ≥3 criteria were considered frail; 1-2 criteria, pre-frail; no criterion, robust. Interviews with the participating physicians on the feasibility of integrating geriatric assessments in routine clinical consultations at spa facilities were recorded and their content, analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Frailty was detected in 112 individuals (56.9%), 26 (13.2%) were considered prefrail, and 59 (29.9%), robust. Regarding the interviews, three physicians indicated the geriatric assessments could be integrated in the routine spa consultations; two, in the consultations of specific/targeted patients, but not in routine; two, only in the context of health education; two, in the context of research protocols. The content of interviews highlighted geriatric assessments provided a better overview of the health/clinical status of the patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Frailty is very prevalent in older patients of spa facilities. Such facilities may constitute an interesting clinical setting for screening for frailty through the implementation of geriatric assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":73537,"journal":{"name":"JAR life","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10002897/pdf/jarlife-11-026.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAR life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jarlife.2022.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: No investigation has assessed frailty in the clinical setting of thermal/spa facilities, which often receive older patients with osteo-articular and musculoskeletal conditions.

Objective: To examine the prevalence of frailty in older adults receiving thermal/spa treatment and to gather preliminary evidence about the feasibility of integrating geriatric assessments, including frailty, in the routine clinical consultations in spa facilities.

Methods: Mixed design, with a quantitative cross-sectional investigation performed among 197 volunteer patients (mean age 73.2 ± 6.4 years-old; 82.2% women) of seven French thermal/spa facilities and a qualitative investigation (semi-structured interviews) with the nine physicians working in the participating facilities. Frailty was defined according to a modified Fried frailty phenotype based on six self-reported criteria (including mobility impairment, nutritional status, and fatigue): individuals meeting ≥3 criteria were considered frail; 1-2 criteria, pre-frail; no criterion, robust. Interviews with the participating physicians on the feasibility of integrating geriatric assessments in routine clinical consultations at spa facilities were recorded and their content, analyzed.

Results: Frailty was detected in 112 individuals (56.9%), 26 (13.2%) were considered prefrail, and 59 (29.9%), robust. Regarding the interviews, three physicians indicated the geriatric assessments could be integrated in the routine spa consultations; two, in the consultations of specific/targeted patients, but not in routine; two, only in the context of health education; two, in the context of research protocols. The content of interviews highlighted geriatric assessments provided a better overview of the health/clinical status of the patients.

Conclusion: Frailty is very prevalent in older patients of spa facilities. Such facilities may constitute an interesting clinical setting for screening for frailty through the implementation of geriatric assessments.

识别热/水疗临床环境中的虚弱:一项横断面研究。
背景:没有研究评估热/水疗设施的临床环境中的虚弱,这些设施通常接受患有骨关节和肌肉骨骼疾病的老年患者。目的:研究接受热/spa治疗的老年人虚弱的患病率,并收集有关将包括虚弱在内的老年病学评估纳入spa设施常规临床会诊的可行性的初步证据。方法:采用混合设计,对197例志愿者患者(平均年龄73.2±6.4岁;(82.2%女性)对七家法国温泉/水疗设施进行了调查,并对在参与设施工作的九名医生进行了定性调查(半结构化访谈)。虚弱是根据改进的Fried虚弱表型来定义的,该表型基于6个自我报告的标准(包括行动障碍、营养状况和疲劳):满足≥3个标准的个体被认为虚弱;1-2标准,前期虚弱;无标准,稳健。对参与访谈的医生就在水疗设施的常规临床会诊中纳入老年评估的可行性进行了记录,并对访谈内容进行了分析。结果:112人(56.9%)体弱多病,26人(13.2%)体弱多病,59人(29.9%)体弱多病。关于访谈,三名医生表示,老年评估可纳入常规水疗会诊;二是在特定/目标患者的咨询中,而不是在常规中;二、仅在健康教育的背景下;第二,在研究协议的背景下。访谈的内容强调,老年评估可以更好地概述患者的健康/临床状况。结论:老年spa患者体弱多病非常普遍。这样的设施可能构成一个有趣的临床环境,通过实施老年评估来筛查虚弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信