Deathbed Etiquette - The Guide: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Views of Practitioners on its Introduction into End-of-Life Care Settings.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Palliative Care Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-20 DOI:10.1177/08258597231158325
Mette Kragh-Furbo, Maddy French, Lesley Dunleavy, Sophie Hancock, Karen Sanders, Margaret Doherty, Amy Gadoud
{"title":"Deathbed Etiquette - The Guide: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Views of Practitioners on its Introduction into End-of-Life Care Settings.","authors":"Mette Kragh-Furbo, Maddy French, Lesley Dunleavy, Sophie Hancock, Karen Sanders, Margaret Doherty, Amy Gadoud","doi":"10.1177/08258597231158325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> It is common for relatives to feel uncertain about what to expect at the bedside of a dying loved one. The Centre for the Art of Dying Well together with clinical, academic and communications experts created a 'Deathbed Etiquette' guide offering information and reassurance to relatives. This study explores the views of practitioners with experience in end-of-life care on the guide and how it might be used. <b>Methods:</b> Three online focus groups and nine individual interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 21 participants involved in end-of-life care. Participants were recruited through hospices and social media. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. <b>Results:</b> Discussions highlighted the importance of effective communication that normalises experiences of being by the bedside of a dying loved one. Tensions around the use of the words 'death' and 'dying' were identified. Most participants also expressed reservations about the title, with the word 'deathbed' found to be old-fashioned and the word 'etiquette' not capturing the varied experiences of being by the bedside. Overall, however, participants agreed that the guide is useful for 'mythbusting' death and dying. <b>Conclusion:</b> There is a need for communication resources that can support practitioners in having honest and compassionate conversations with relatives in end-of-life care. The 'Deathbed Etiquette' guide is a promising resource to support relatives and healthcare practitioners by providing them with suitable information and helpful phrases. More research is needed on how to implement the guide in healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"162-167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967078/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08258597231158325","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: It is common for relatives to feel uncertain about what to expect at the bedside of a dying loved one. The Centre for the Art of Dying Well together with clinical, academic and communications experts created a 'Deathbed Etiquette' guide offering information and reassurance to relatives. This study explores the views of practitioners with experience in end-of-life care on the guide and how it might be used. Methods: Three online focus groups and nine individual interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 21 participants involved in end-of-life care. Participants were recruited through hospices and social media. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Discussions highlighted the importance of effective communication that normalises experiences of being by the bedside of a dying loved one. Tensions around the use of the words 'death' and 'dying' were identified. Most participants also expressed reservations about the title, with the word 'deathbed' found to be old-fashioned and the word 'etiquette' not capturing the varied experiences of being by the bedside. Overall, however, participants agreed that the guide is useful for 'mythbusting' death and dying. Conclusion: There is a need for communication resources that can support practitioners in having honest and compassionate conversations with relatives in end-of-life care. The 'Deathbed Etiquette' guide is a promising resource to support relatives and healthcare practitioners by providing them with suitable information and helpful phrases. More research is needed on how to implement the guide in healthcare settings.

临终礼仪-指南:一项质性研究,探讨从业人员对临终关怀设置的看法。
目的:对于亲人来说,不确定在临终亲人的床边会发生什么是很常见的。“临终艺术中心”与临床、学术和传播专家共同制定了一份“临终礼仪”指南,为亲属提供信息和安慰。本研究探讨了从业人员的意见与经验,在临终关怀的指导和如何使用它。方法:采用3个在线焦点小组和9个个人访谈,对21名参与临终关怀的参与者进行有目的的抽样调查。参与者是通过收容所和社交媒体招募的。采用专题分析对数据进行分析。结果:讨论强调了有效沟通的重要性,使濒死亲人床边的体验正常化。在使用“死亡”和“垂死”这两个词时,人们发现了紧张的气氛。大多数参与者也对这个标题持保留态度,他们认为“死亡之床”这个词已经过时了,“礼仪”这个词也没有捕捉到临终前的各种经历。然而,总的来说,参与者一致认为该指南对“打破神话”的死亡和临终是有用的。结论:在临终关怀中,需要有足够的沟通资源来支持从业者与亲属进行诚实和富有同情心的对话。“临终礼仪”指南是一个很有前途的资源,通过提供合适的信息和有用的短语来支持亲属和医疗从业人员。关于如何在医疗保健环境中实施该指南,需要进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Palliative Care
Journal of Palliative Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Palliative Care is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, international and interdisciplinary forum for practical, critical thought on palliative care and palliative medicine. JPC publishes high-quality original research, opinion papers/commentaries, narrative and humanities works, case reports/case series, and reports on international activities and comparative palliative care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信