Effect of Phacoemulsification on Intraocular Pressure in Eyes with Functioning Tube Shunts.

IF 1.6 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Wesam Shamseldin Shalaby, Sonali Patel, Sophia S Lam, Allen Ganjei, Aakriti Garg Shukla, Natasha Kolomeyer, Daniel Lee, L Jay Katz, Marlene R Moster, Jonathan Myers, Reza Razeghinejad
{"title":"Effect of Phacoemulsification on Intraocular Pressure in Eyes with Functioning Tube Shunts.","authors":"Wesam Shamseldin Shalaby,&nbsp;Sonali Patel,&nbsp;Sophia S Lam,&nbsp;Allen Ganjei,&nbsp;Aakriti Garg Shukla,&nbsp;Natasha Kolomeyer,&nbsp;Daniel Lee,&nbsp;L Jay Katz,&nbsp;Marlene R Moster,&nbsp;Jonathan Myers,&nbsp;Reza Razeghinejad","doi":"10.18502/jovr.v18i2.13180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of phacoemulsification on intraocular pressure (IOP) in eyes with functioning tube shunts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective chart review of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients with a functioning tube who underwent phacoemulsification and had <math><mo>≥</mo></math>24 months of follow-up. The primary end point was defined as surgical failure (IOP <math><mo>></mo></math> 21 mmHg) at month 24, progression to no light perception (NLP) vision, glaucoma reoperation, or implant removal. Surgical failure defined as IOP <math><mo>></mo></math>18 and <math><mo>></mo></math>15 mmHg, changes in visual acuity (VA), IOP, and number of medications were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven eyes of 27 patients with moderate or severe POAG were included. The mean age of the patients was 64.2 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 10.8 years. The interval between the tube shunt and phacoemulsification was 28.8 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 25.0 months. At the end of the study, four (14.8%) eyes met the failure criteria; the average time to failure was 9.3 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 3.8 months. The causes of failure were high IOP in two (50.0%) and glaucoma reoperation in two (50.0%) eyes; however, no eyes progressed to NLP vision. Surgical failure defined as IOP <math><mo>></mo></math>18 and <math><mo>></mo></math>15 mmHg showed an increasing failure rate (18.5% and 48.5%, respectively).Themean IOP and medications number remained stable at month 24 compared to baseline (<i>P</i> = 0.131 and <i>P</i> = 0.302, respectively). Initially, VA showed improvement, with the greatest improvement at 6 months (<i>P</i> = 0.001), but at 24 months the improvement was no longer significant (<i>P</i> = 0.430).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Phacoemulsification in patients with functioning tubes did not change the mean IOP in most of the patients (86.2%); the number of medications also did not increase.</p>","PeriodicalId":16586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","volume":"18 2","pages":"150-156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v18i2.13180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of phacoemulsification on intraocular pressure (IOP) in eyes with functioning tube shunts.

Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients with a functioning tube who underwent phacoemulsification and had 24 months of follow-up. The primary end point was defined as surgical failure (IOP > 21 mmHg) at month 24, progression to no light perception (NLP) vision, glaucoma reoperation, or implant removal. Surgical failure defined as IOP >18 and >15 mmHg, changes in visual acuity (VA), IOP, and number of medications were assessed.

Results: Twenty-seven eyes of 27 patients with moderate or severe POAG were included. The mean age of the patients was 64.2 ± 10.8 years. The interval between the tube shunt and phacoemulsification was 28.8 ± 25.0 months. At the end of the study, four (14.8%) eyes met the failure criteria; the average time to failure was 9.3 ± 3.8 months. The causes of failure were high IOP in two (50.0%) and glaucoma reoperation in two (50.0%) eyes; however, no eyes progressed to NLP vision. Surgical failure defined as IOP >18 and >15 mmHg showed an increasing failure rate (18.5% and 48.5%, respectively).Themean IOP and medications number remained stable at month 24 compared to baseline (P = 0.131 and P = 0.302, respectively). Initially, VA showed improvement, with the greatest improvement at 6 months (P = 0.001), but at 24 months the improvement was no longer significant (P = 0.430).

Conclusion: Phacoemulsification in patients with functioning tubes did not change the mean IOP in most of the patients (86.2%); the number of medications also did not increase.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

超声乳化术对正常分流眼眼压的影响。
目的:探讨超声乳化术对正常分流眼眼压的影响。方法:回顾性分析原发开角型青光眼(POAG)患者行超声乳化术,随访≥24个月。主要终点定义为第24个月手术失败(IOP > 21 mmHg),进展为无光感(NLP)视力,青光眼再手术或植入物移除。手术失败定义为IOP >18和>15 mmHg,视力(VA)、IOP和药物数量的变化进行评估。结果:纳入27例中重度POAG患者27只眼。患者平均年龄64.2±10.8岁。输卵管分流至超声乳化手术的时间间隔为28.8±25.0个月。研究结束时,4只(14.8%)眼符合失效标准;平均失效时间为9.3±3.8个月。失败原因为高IOP 2例(50.0%),青光眼再手术2例(50.0%);然而,没有眼睛进展到NLP视力。手术失败定义为IOP >18和>15 mmHg,失败率增加(分别为18.5%和48.5%)。与基线相比,平均IOP和药物数量在第24个月保持稳定(P = 0.131和P = 0.302)。最初,VA表现出改善,在6个月时改善最大(P = 0.001),但在24个月时改善不再显著(P = 0.430)。结论:输卵管功能正常的患者行超声乳化术后,大多数患者(86.2%)的平均IOP未发生改变;药物的数量也没有增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信