Angiographic outcomes of embolization in patients with intracranial aneurysms with coil- assisted Laser cut stent versus braided stents.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Interventional Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-15 DOI:10.1177/15910199231174576
Andrés F Ortiz-Giraldo, Daniela D Vera, Andrés J Catalá, Paula Correa-Ruiz, Omar E Flores-Sandoval, Adriana Rodriguez-Gelves, Juan Jose Lara, Sergio Serrano-Gómez, Adriana Reyes, Carlos Ferreira-Prada, Melquizidel Galvis-Méndez, Oliverio Vargas-Pérez, Daniel E Mantilla-García
{"title":"Angiographic outcomes of embolization in patients with intracranial aneurysms with coil- assisted Laser cut stent versus braided stents.","authors":"Andrés F Ortiz-Giraldo, Daniela D Vera, Andrés J Catalá, Paula Correa-Ruiz, Omar E Flores-Sandoval, Adriana Rodriguez-Gelves, Juan Jose Lara, Sergio Serrano-Gómez, Adriana Reyes, Carlos Ferreira-Prada, Melquizidel Galvis-Méndez, Oliverio Vargas-Pérez, Daniel E Mantilla-García","doi":"10.1177/15910199231174576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionIntracranial aneurysms (IA) are a focal dilatation of the vessel wall, the rupture of these, causes subarachnoid hemorrhage. Until now, endovascular management is the ideal treatment, providing the interventionist a range of options among which the stent and coils embolization stands out because of its occlusion rate. This study presents the results of a retrospective cohort comparing the effectiveness, morbidity, and mortality of IA treatment with laser-cut stent-assisted coils versus braided stents.MethodologyRetrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with coil-assisted laser-cut stents or braided stents between January 2014 and December 2021.ResultsIn total, 138 patients with 147 intracranial aneurysms were analyzed, 91 of them were treated with laser-cut stent and 56 with braided stents. The main antecedent was arterial hypertension (48.55%). In the immediate angiographic control, a Raymond Roy scale (RRO) I was obtained in 86.81% of the patients with laser-cut stents and 87.50% of the patients with braided stents. In the angiographic follow-up at 12 months, an RRO I occlusion rate of 85.19% was reported in both groups. Perioperative complications occur in 16 patients treated with laser-cut stents and 12 patients treated with braided stents. Three patients presented bleeding complications during the 12-month follow-up, of which two correspond to patients treated with braided stents and one with a laser-cut stent.ConclusionTreatment of patients with intracranial aneurysms with laser-cut stents or braided stents and coils is just as safe and effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"482-488"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12280251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199231174576","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionIntracranial aneurysms (IA) are a focal dilatation of the vessel wall, the rupture of these, causes subarachnoid hemorrhage. Until now, endovascular management is the ideal treatment, providing the interventionist a range of options among which the stent and coils embolization stands out because of its occlusion rate. This study presents the results of a retrospective cohort comparing the effectiveness, morbidity, and mortality of IA treatment with laser-cut stent-assisted coils versus braided stents.MethodologyRetrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with coil-assisted laser-cut stents or braided stents between January 2014 and December 2021.ResultsIn total, 138 patients with 147 intracranial aneurysms were analyzed, 91 of them were treated with laser-cut stent and 56 with braided stents. The main antecedent was arterial hypertension (48.55%). In the immediate angiographic control, a Raymond Roy scale (RRO) I was obtained in 86.81% of the patients with laser-cut stents and 87.50% of the patients with braided stents. In the angiographic follow-up at 12 months, an RRO I occlusion rate of 85.19% was reported in both groups. Perioperative complications occur in 16 patients treated with laser-cut stents and 12 patients treated with braided stents. Three patients presented bleeding complications during the 12-month follow-up, of which two correspond to patients treated with braided stents and one with a laser-cut stent.ConclusionTreatment of patients with intracranial aneurysms with laser-cut stents or braided stents and coils is just as safe and effective.

线圈辅助激光切割支架与编织支架在颅内动脉瘤栓塞中的血管造影效果比较。
颅内动脉瘤(IA)是一种局部扩张的血管壁,其破裂可引起蛛网膜下腔出血。到目前为止,血管内管理是理想的治疗方法,为介入医生提供了一系列的选择,其中支架和线圈栓塞因其闭塞率而脱颖而出。本研究介绍了一项回顾性队列研究的结果,比较了激光切割支架辅助线圈与编织支架治疗IA的有效性、发病率和死亡率。方法回顾性研究2014年1月至2021年12月期间,经线圈辅助激光切割支架或编织支架治疗的未破裂颅内动脉瘤患者。结果共分析138例颅内动脉瘤147例,其中激光切割支架治疗91例,编织支架治疗56例。以动脉高血压为主(48.55%)。在即刻血管造影对照中,86.81%的激光切割支架患者和87.50%的编织支架患者的RRO评分为I级。在12个月的血管造影随访中,两组RRO I闭塞率均为85.19%。激光切割支架16例,编织支架12例,围手术期出现并发症。随访12个月,3例患者出现出血并发症,其中2例为编织支架治疗,1例为激光切割支架治疗。结论激光切割支架与编织支架线圈治疗颅内动脉瘤安全有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信