Impact of Finishing and Polishing Procedures on CAD/CAM In Vitro Milled Ceramics Surfaces: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
T Canceill, J Lacroux, C Bataille, J Delrieu, K Nasr, F Diemer, R Esclassan
{"title":"Impact of Finishing and Polishing Procedures on CAD/CAM In Vitro Milled Ceramics Surfaces: A Systematic Review.","authors":"T Canceill, J Lacroux, C Bataille, J Delrieu, K Nasr, F Diemer, R Esclassan","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2520Canceill11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>CAD/CAM prostheses may be produced in prosthetic laboratories or directly by practitioners. Quality of ceramic polishing procedures is a controversial topic and it would be interesting for practitioners working with CAD/CAM devices to determine which method is the most efficient regarding finishing and polishing. This systematic review aims to evaluate the impact of different finishing and polishing procedures on the surface of milled ceramics.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A precise request was launched on the PubMed database. Studies included if they met the criteria of a specifically prepared PICO search. A first selection was performed by analysing titles and abstracts: the articles presenting a study conducted on non-CAD/CAM milled ceramics and research not containing comparisons of finishing procedures were not included. Roughness was evaluated in 15 articles. Nine papers recommended mechanical polishing over glazing regardless of the type of ceramic used. However, no significant differences were detected between the surface roughness of glazed and polished ceramics in nine other publications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>there is no scientific evidence demonstrating the superiority of hand polishing over glazing on CAD/CAM-milled ceramics.</p>","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2520Canceill11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: CAD/CAM prostheses may be produced in prosthetic laboratories or directly by practitioners. Quality of ceramic polishing procedures is a controversial topic and it would be interesting for practitioners working with CAD/CAM devices to determine which method is the most efficient regarding finishing and polishing. This systematic review aims to evaluate the impact of different finishing and polishing procedures on the surface of milled ceramics.

Materials and methods: A precise request was launched on the PubMed database. Studies included if they met the criteria of a specifically prepared PICO search. A first selection was performed by analysing titles and abstracts: the articles presenting a study conducted on non-CAD/CAM milled ceramics and research not containing comparisons of finishing procedures were not included. Roughness was evaluated in 15 articles. Nine papers recommended mechanical polishing over glazing regardless of the type of ceramic used. However, no significant differences were detected between the surface roughness of glazed and polished ceramics in nine other publications.

Conclusions: there is no scientific evidence demonstrating the superiority of hand polishing over glazing on CAD/CAM-milled ceramics.

精加工和抛光工艺对CAD/CAM体外铣削陶瓷表面的影响:系统综述。
介绍和目的:CAD/CAM假体可以在假体实验室生产,也可以由从业者直接生产。陶瓷抛光程序的质量是一个有争议的话题,对于使用CAD/CAM设备的从业者来说,确定哪种方法在精加工和抛光方面最有效将是一件有趣的事情。本系统综述旨在评价不同的精加工和抛光工艺对铣削陶瓷表面的影响。材料和方法:在PubMed数据库上发起了一个精确的请求。研究包括是否符合特别准备的PICO搜索的标准。第一次选择是通过分析标题和摘要来进行的:不包括对非cad /CAM铣削陶瓷进行研究的文章和不包含精加工程序比较的研究。粗糙度在15篇文章中进行了评估。九篇论文推荐机械抛光而不是上光,无论使用的是哪种陶瓷。然而,在其他九份出版物中,没有发现釉面和抛光陶瓷表面粗糙度之间的显著差异。结论:没有科学证据表明在CAD/ cam铣削陶瓷上手工抛光优于上釉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信