Functional near infrared spectroscopy activation during an executive function task differs between healthy older and younger adults

IF 1.7 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Heather Kwan , Vanessa Scarapicchia , Drew Halliday , Stuart MacDonald , Jodie R. Gawryluk
{"title":"Functional near infrared spectroscopy activation during an executive function task differs between healthy older and younger adults","authors":"Heather Kwan ,&nbsp;Vanessa Scarapicchia ,&nbsp;Drew Halliday ,&nbsp;Stuart MacDonald ,&nbsp;Jodie R. Gawryluk","doi":"10.1016/j.nbas.2022.100029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Healthy aging can include declines in processing speed and executive function. Further research is needed to characterize the neurobiological underpinnings of these cognitive changes in older adulthood. The current study used functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), an optical neuroimaging technique, to examine differences in cerebral oxygenation between healthy older adults (OA) and younger adults (YA) during a measure of cognitive interference.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Thirty-four participants were sampled from two age groups: YA (mean age = 28.1 years, SD = 2.8, F = 9) and OA (mean age = 70.9 years, SD = 5.4, F = 9). Participants completed the Multi-Source Interference Task (MSIT), a measure of executive function with high and low-demand conditions, while undergoing fNIRS recordings using a TechEn CW6 system with 34-source-detector channels, situated over the prefrontal cortex. Functional activation patterns, accuracy, and reaction time were compared between and within groups for each condition.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Behaviourally, during the control condition, OA and YA had comparable accuracy, although OA had significantly slower reaction times than YA. During the interference condition, OA had significantly lower accuracy and slower reaction times than YA. Results demonstrated a significant difference between groups with an age-related increase in HbO for OA in both conditions (p &lt; 0.05). Within groups, OA showed greater activation during the control condition, while YA demonstrated greater activation during the interference condition.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The findings suggest that OA recruit additional neural resources to achieve similar behavioural performance during low-level cognitive interference, but that compensation in OA may be insufficient to support behavioural performance at higher levels of interference.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72131,"journal":{"name":"Aging brain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ba/49/main.PMC9997178.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging brain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589958922000019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Healthy aging can include declines in processing speed and executive function. Further research is needed to characterize the neurobiological underpinnings of these cognitive changes in older adulthood. The current study used functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), an optical neuroimaging technique, to examine differences in cerebral oxygenation between healthy older adults (OA) and younger adults (YA) during a measure of cognitive interference.

Methods

Thirty-four participants were sampled from two age groups: YA (mean age = 28.1 years, SD = 2.8, F = 9) and OA (mean age = 70.9 years, SD = 5.4, F = 9). Participants completed the Multi-Source Interference Task (MSIT), a measure of executive function with high and low-demand conditions, while undergoing fNIRS recordings using a TechEn CW6 system with 34-source-detector channels, situated over the prefrontal cortex. Functional activation patterns, accuracy, and reaction time were compared between and within groups for each condition.

Results

Behaviourally, during the control condition, OA and YA had comparable accuracy, although OA had significantly slower reaction times than YA. During the interference condition, OA had significantly lower accuracy and slower reaction times than YA. Results demonstrated a significant difference between groups with an age-related increase in HbO for OA in both conditions (p < 0.05). Within groups, OA showed greater activation during the control condition, while YA demonstrated greater activation during the interference condition.

Conclusions

The findings suggest that OA recruit additional neural resources to achieve similar behavioural performance during low-level cognitive interference, but that compensation in OA may be insufficient to support behavioural performance at higher levels of interference.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在执行功能任务中的功能性近红外光谱激活在健康老年人和年轻人之间是不同的
健康的衰老包括处理速度和执行功能的下降。需要进一步的研究来描述老年期这些认知变化的神经生物学基础。目前的研究使用功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS),一种光学神经成像技术,来检查健康老年人(OA)和年轻人(YA)在认知干扰测量期间脑氧合的差异。MethodsThirty-four参与者抽样从两个年龄组:丫(平均年龄 = 28.1 年,SD = 2.8,F = 9)和OA(平均年龄70.9 =  年,SD = 5.4,F = 9)。参与者完成了多源干扰任务(MSIT),这是一种测量高需求和低需求条件下执行功能的方法,同时使用位于前额皮质上的TechEn CW6系统进行近红外光谱记录,该系统具有34个源探测器通道。功能激活模式、准确性和反应时间在每个条件下组间和组内进行比较。结果在行为上,在控制条件下,OA和YA具有相当的准确性,尽管OA的反应时间明显慢于YA。在干扰条件下,OA的准确率明显低于YA,反应时间明显慢于YA。结果显示,两种情况下骨性关节炎的HbO与年龄相关的增加在两组之间具有显著差异(p < 0.05)。在组内,OA在控制条件下表现出更大的激活,而YA在干扰条件下表现出更大的激活。结论:研究结果表明,在低水平认知干扰时,OA需要额外的神经资源来实现类似的行为表现,但OA的补偿可能不足以支持高水平干扰时的行为表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aging brain
Aging brain Neuroscience (General), Geriatrics and Gerontology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信